Literature DB >> 18648553

Low doses of radiation reduce risk in vivo.

R E J Mitchel1.   

Abstract

The "Linear No Threshold" hypothesis, used in all radiation protection practices, assumes that all doses, no matter how low, increase the risk of cancer, birth defects and heritable mutations. In vitro cell based experiments show adaptive processes in response to low doses and dose rates of low LET radiation, and do not support the hypothesis. This talk will present cellular data and data from animal experiments that test the hypothesis in vivo for cancer risk. The data show that a single, low, whole body dose (less than about 100 mGy) of low LET radiation, given at low dose rate, increased cancer latency and consequently reduced both spontaneous and radiation-induced cancer risk in both genetically normal and cancer-prone mice. This adaptive response lasted for the entire lifespan of all the animals that developed these tumors, and effectively restored a portion of the life that would have been lost due to the cancer in the absence of the low dose. Overall, the results demonstrate that the assumption of a linear increase in risk with increasing dose in vivo is not warranted, and that low doses actually reduce risk.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 18648553      PMCID: PMC2477704          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.06-109.Mitchel

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  6 in total

1.  Dose responses for adaption to low doses of (60)Co gamma rays and (3)H beta particles in normal human fibroblasts.

Authors:  E J Broome; D L Brown; R E J Mitchel
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  The adaptive response modifies latency for radiation-induced myeloid leukemia in CBA/H mice.

Authors:  R E Mitchel; J S Jackson; R A McCann; D R Boreham
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Low-dose ionizing radiation decreases the frequency of neoplastic transformation to a level below the spontaneous rate in C3H 10T1/2 cells.

Authors:  E I Azzam; S M de Toledo; G P Raaphorst; R E Mitchel
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Radiation-induced adaptive response for protection against micronucleus formation and neoplastic transformation in C3H 10T1/2 mouse embryo cells.

Authors:  E I Azzam; G P Raaphorst; R E Mitchel
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Low doses of radiation increase the latency of spontaneous lymphomas and spinal osteosarcomas in cancer-prone, radiation-sensitive Trp53 heterozygous mice.

Authors:  R E J Mitchel; J S Jackson; D P Morrison; S M Carlisle
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Upper dose thresholds for radiation-induced adaptive response against cancer in high-dose-exposed, cancer-prone, radiation-sensitive Trp53 heterozygous mice.

Authors:  R E J Mitchel; J S Jackson; S M Carlisle
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.841

  6 in total
  21 in total

1.  Computational modeling of signaling pathways mediating cell cycle checkpoint control and apoptotic responses to ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage.

Authors:  Yuchao Zhao; In Chio Lou; Rory B Conolly
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Nuclear energy and health: and the benefits of low-dose radiation hormesis.

Authors:  Jerry M Cuttler; Myron Pollycove
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  A perspective on the scientific, philosophical, and policy dimensions of hormesis.

Authors:  George R Hoffmann
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Protective bystander effects simulated with the state-vector model.

Authors:  Helmut Schöllnberger; Peter M Eckl
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Study of cytogenetic effects induced by accelerated (12)C ions with energy of 200 MeV/nucleon in mice.

Authors:  V E Balakin; S I Zaichkina; O M Rozanova; A Kh Akhmadieva; G F Aptikaeva; E N Smirnova; O A Vakhrusheva; S P Romanchenko; A E Shemyakov; J Ružička
Journal:  Dokl Biochem Biophys       Date:  2011-09-18       Impact factor: 0.788

6.  Human lung cancer risks from radon - part I - influence from bystander effects - a microdose analysis.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard; Richard E Thompson; Georgia C Beecher
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 7.  Cellular stress responses, the hormesis paradigm, and vitagenes: novel targets for therapeutic intervention in neurodegenerative disorders.

Authors:  Vittorio Calabrese; Carolin Cornelius; Albena T Dinkova-Kostova; Edward J Calabrese; Mark P Mattson
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2010-08-28       Impact factor: 8.401

8.  Immunological mechanism of the low-dose radiation-induced suppression of cancer metastases in a mouse model.

Authors:  Ewa M Nowosielska; Aneta Cheda; Jolanta Wrembel-Wargocka; Marek K Janiak
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  It's time for a new low-dose-radiation risk assessment paradigm--one that acknowledges hormesis.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-09-30       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 10.  Systems biological and mechanistic modelling of radiation-induced cancer.

Authors:  M P Little; W F Heidenreich; S H Moolgavkar; H Schöllnberger; D C Thomas
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 1.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.