Literature DB >> 12105988

Dose responses for adaption to low doses of (60)Co gamma rays and (3)H beta particles in normal human fibroblasts.

E J Broome1, D L Brown, R E J Mitchel.   

Abstract

The dose response for adaption to radiation at low doses was compared in normal human fibroblasts (AG1522) exposed to either (60)Co gamma rays or (3)H beta particles. Cells were grown in culture to confluence and exposed at either 37 degrees C or 0 degrees C to (3)H beta-particle or (60)Co gamma-ray adapting doses ranging from 0.1 mGy to 500 mGy. These cells, and unexposed control cells, were allowed to adapt during a fixed 3-h, 37 degrees C incubation prior to a 4-Gy challenge dose of (60)Co gamma rays. Adaption was assessed by measuring micronucleus frequency in cytokinesis-blocked, binucleate cells. No adaption was detected in cells exposed to (60)Co gamma radiation at 37 degrees C after a dose of 0.1 mGy given at a low dose rate or to 500 mGy given at a high dose rate. However, low-dose-rate exposure (1-3 mGy/min) to any dose between 1 and 500 mGy from either radiation, delivered at either temperature, caused cells to adapt and reduced the micronucleus frequency that resulted from the subsequent 4-Gy exposure. Within this dose range, the magnitude of the reduction was the same, regardless of the dose or radiation type. These results demonstrate that doses as low as (on average) about one track per cell (1 mGy) produce the same maximum adaptive response as do doses that deposit many tracks per cell, and that the two radiations were not different in this regard. Exposure at a temperature where metabolic processes, including DNA repair, were inactive (0 degrees C) did not alter the result, indicating that the adaptive response is not sensitive to changes in the accumulation of DNA damage within this range. The results also show that the RBE for low doses of tritium beta-particle radiation is 1, using adaption as the end point.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12105988     DOI: 10.1667/0033-7587(2002)158[0181:drfatl]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  34 in total

Review 1.  Hormesis, an update of the present position.

Authors:  Lennart Johansson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Low-dose pretreatment for radiation therapy.

Authors:  Richard Blankenbecler
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 3.  Twilight effects of low doses of ionizing radiation on cellular systems: a bird's eye view on current concepts and research.

Authors:  Ilaria Postiglione; Angela Chiaviello; Giuseppe Palumbo
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  A perspective on the scientific, philosophical, and policy dimensions of hormesis.

Authors:  George R Hoffmann
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  A review: Development of a microdose model for analysis of adaptive response and bystander dose response behavior.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Low doses of radiation are protective in vitro and in vivo: evolutionary origins.

Authors:  R E J Mitchel
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-08-19       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Extremely low doses of X-radiation can induce adaptive responses in mouse prostate.

Authors:  Tanya K Day; Guoxin Zeng; Antony M Hooker; Madhava Bhat; David R Turner; Pamela J Sykes
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Responses to low doses of ionizing radiation in biological systems.

Authors:  Ludwig E Feinendegen; Myron Pollycove; Charles A Sondhaus
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2004-07

9.  The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data.

Authors:  Maurice Tubiana; Ludwig E Feinendegen; Chichuan Yang; Joseph M Kaminski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  The bystander effect: recent developments and implications for understanding the dose response.

Authors:  R E J Mitchel
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2004-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.