Literature DB >> 15222780

Upper dose thresholds for radiation-induced adaptive response against cancer in high-dose-exposed, cancer-prone, radiation-sensitive Trp53 heterozygous mice.

R E J Mitchel1, J S Jackson, S M Carlisle.   

Abstract

Trp53 heterozygous mice are radiation-sensitive and cancer-prone. Groups of 7-8-week-old female Trp53 heterozygous mice were exposed to 4 Gy of 60Co gamma radiation at high (0.5 Gy/min) or low (0.5 mGy/min) dose rate. Other groups received 10 or 100 mGy at low dose rate 24 h prior to the 4-Gy dose. Tumor frequency and latency were measured over the animals' life span. Exposure to 10 mGy prior to 4 Gy resulted in a small (approximately 5%) but significant life-span regain and increased latency (approximately 9%) for all malignant tumors taken together, but 100 mGy further reduced life span slightly (approximately 7%). Latency responses were tumor type-specific. The prior 10-mGy exposure resulted in a small (approximately 7%) regain in latency for lymphomas but no change in latency for spinal osteosarcomas. Increasing the adapting dose to 100 mGy eliminated the increase in lymphoma latency and further reduced life span (approximately 8%). A 10-mGy dose prior to 4 Gy at low dose rate had no effects. Adapting exposures had no significant effect on tumor frequency. We conclude that a single low dose induced a small protective response in vivo in Trp53+/- mice, reducing the carcinogenic effects of a subsequent large, high-dose-rate exposure by increasing tumor latency. The upper dose threshold at which low-dose protective effects gave way to detrimental effects was tumor type-specific, as found previously for spontaneous tumors in these same cancer-prone mice (Radiat. Res. 159, 320-327, 2003). However, the upper dose thresholds appear to be lower (below 100 mGy) for radiation-induced tumors than for the same tumors appearing spontaneously.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15222780     DOI: 10.1667/rr3190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  22 in total

1.  A perspective on the scientific, philosophical, and policy dimensions of hormesis.

Authors:  George R Hoffmann
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  A review: Development of a microdose model for analysis of adaptive response and bystander dose response behavior.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Low doses of radiation are protective in vitro and in vivo: evolutionary origins.

Authors:  R E J Mitchel
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-08-19       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Protective bystander effects simulated with the state-vector model.

Authors:  Helmut Schöllnberger; Peter M Eckl
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Effect of site-specific bronchial radon progeny deposition on the spatial and temporal distributions of cellular responses.

Authors:  Arpád Farkas; Werner Hofmann; Imre Balásházy; István Szoke; Balázs G Madas; Mona Moustafa
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  The dose window for radiation-induced protective adaptive responses.

Authors:  Ronald E J Mitchel
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 7.  Radioadaptive response revisited.

Authors:  Soile Tapio; Vesna Jacob
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 8.  Systems biological and mechanistic modelling of radiation-induced cancer.

Authors:  M P Little; W F Heidenreich; S H Moolgavkar; H Schöllnberger; D C Thomas
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  Surgery for Li Fraumeni syndrome: pushing the limits of surgical oncology.

Authors:  Russell C Langan; Kiran H Lagisetty; Scott Atay; Prakash Pandalai; Alexander Stojadinovic; Udo Rudloff; Itzhak Avital
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.339

10.  Cancer and low dose responses in vivo: implications for radiation protection.

Authors:  R E J Mitchel
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.