Literature DB >> 10453088

The adaptive response modifies latency for radiation-induced myeloid leukemia in CBA/H mice.

R E Mitchel1, J S Jackson, R A McCann, D R Boreham.   

Abstract

We have investigated the effect of the adaptive response on acute myeloid leukemia (AML) induced in CBA/Harwell mice by a chronic radiation exposure. Groups of mice irradiated with a total dose of 1. 0 Gy at two different chronic dose rates (0.5, 0.004 Gy/h) had similar frequencies of AML. Compared to control animals that did not develop AML, irradiation at either of these dose rates did not change the longevity of the mice that did not die of leukemia. The survival rates of irradiated mice that did develop leukemia in the two groups were not different from each other, indicating that the dose rates produced similar responses and therefore were both chronic exposures. We then tested the ability of a chronic 10-cGy (0. 5 Gy/h) exposure to ionizing radiation, mild hyperthermia (40.5 degrees C whole-body, 60 min) or treatment with interleukin-1 (1500 U i.p.) to induce an adaptive response and modify the frequency or latency of AML which resulted from a subsequent (24 h later) 1.0-Gy (0.5 Gy/h) chronic radiation exposure. The frequency of radiation-induced leukemia was not changed in mice given any of the three adapting treatments 24 h prior to the chronic 1.0-Gy dose that induced leukemia. However, the latent period for development of AML was significantly increased by both the prior low radiation dose and mild hyperthermia treatment. Injection of interleukin-1, in contrast, may have reduced the latent period. Similar to the single 1.0-Gy chronic exposure alone, none of the adapting treatments prior to that exposure influenced the survival of animals that did not develop AML. These results indicate that an earlier exposure to a small adapting dose of radiation or to a mild heat stress can influence secondary steps in radiation-induced carcinogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10453088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  49 in total

1.  Low-dose radiation: thresholds, bystander effects, and adaptive responses.

Authors:  William M Bonner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A stochastic markov model of cellular response to radiation.

Authors:  Krzysztof Wojciech Fornalski; Ludwik Dobrzyński; Marek Krzysztof Janiak
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 3.  Twilight effects of low doses of ionizing radiation on cellular systems: a bird's eye view on current concepts and research.

Authors:  Ilaria Postiglione; Angela Chiaviello; Giuseppe Palumbo
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  The adaptive response and protection against heritable mutations and fetal malformation.

Authors:  D R Boreham; J-A Dolling; C Somers; J Quinn; R E J Mitchel
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Low doses of radiation are protective in vitro and in vivo: evolutionary origins.

Authors:  R E J Mitchel
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-08-19       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Protective bystander effects simulated with the state-vector model.

Authors:  Helmut Schöllnberger; Peter M Eckl
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  DOE program--developing a scientific basis for responses to low-dose exposures: impact on dose-response relationships.

Authors:  Antone L Brooks; Lezlie Couch
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-09-23       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Very large amounts of radiation are required to produce cancer.

Authors:  Antone L Brooks; T Edmond Hui; Lezlie A Couch
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-09-30       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  Adaptive and bystander responses in human and rodent cell cultures exposed to low level ionizing radiation: the impact of linear energy transfer.

Authors:  Sonia M de Toledo; Edouard I Azzam
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 2.658

10.  The bystander effect: recent developments and implications for understanding the dose response.

Authors:  R E J Mitchel
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2004-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.