Literature DB >> 19343116

Nuclear energy and health: and the benefits of low-dose radiation hormesis.

Jerry M Cuttler1, Myron Pollycove.   

Abstract

Energy needs worldwide are expected to increase for the foreseeable future, but fuel supplies are limited. Nuclear reactors could supply much of the energy demand in a safe, sustainable manner were it not for fear of potential releases of radioactivity. Such releases would likely deliver a low dose or dose rate of radiation, within the range of naturally occurring radiation, to which life is already accustomed. The key areas of concern are discussed. Studies of actual health effects, especially thyroid cancers, following exposures are assessed. Radiation hormesis is explained, pointing out that beneficial effects are expected following a low dose or dose rate because protective responses against stresses are stimulated. The notions that no amount of radiation is small enough to be harmless and that a nuclear accident could kill hundreds of thousands are challenged in light of experience: more than a century with radiation and six decades with reactors. If nuclear energy is to play a significant role in meeting future needs, regulatory authorities must examine the scientific evidence and communicate the real health effects of nuclear radiation. Negative images and implications of health risks derived by unscientific extrapolations of harmful effects of high doses must be dispelled.

Entities:  

Keywords:  radiation health effects; radiation hormesis; regulatory implications; social acceptance; sustainable nuclear energy

Year:  2008        PMID: 19343116      PMCID: PMC2664640          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.08-024.Cuttler

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  37 in total

1.  Toxicology rethinks its central belief.

Authors:  Edward J Calabrese; Linda A Baldwin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Alcohol consumption and mortality among middle-aged and elderly Japanese men and women.

Authors:  Yingsong Lin; Shogo Kikuchi; Akiko Tamakoshi; Kenji Wakai; Takashi Kawamura; Hiroyasu Iso; Itsuro Ogimoto; Kiyoko Yagyu; Yuki Obata; Teruo Ishibashi
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2005-01-23       Impact factor: 3.797

3.  Smarter use of nuclear waste.

Authors:  William H Hannum; Gerald E Marsh; George S Stanford
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.142

4.  Management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer.

Authors:  David S Cooper; Gerard M Doherty; Bryan R Haugen; Richard T Kloos; Stephanie L Lee; Susan J Mandel; Ernest L Mazzaferri; Bryan McIver; Steven I Sherman; R Michael Tuttle
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.568

5.  What becomes of nuclear risk assessment in light of radiation hormesis?

Authors:  Jerry M Cuttler
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  T cell potentiation by low dose ionizing radiation: possible mechanisms.

Authors:  T Makinodan; S J James
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 1.316

7.  Low dose fractionated whole body irradiation in the treatment of advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  N C Choi; A R Timothy; S D Kaufman; R W Carey; A C Aisenberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Cancer incidence and mortality after radioiodine treatment for hyperthyroidism: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  J A Franklyn; P Maisonneuve; M Sheppard; J Betteridge; P Boyle
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-06-19       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Thyroid cancer after radiotherapy for childhood cancer.

Authors:  P D Inskip
Journal:  Med Pediatr Oncol       Date:  2001-05

Review 10.  Hormesis and medicine.

Authors:  Edward J Calabrese
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 4.335

View more
  16 in total

1.  Commentary on Using LNT for Radiation Protection and Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Jerry M Cuttler
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Editorial: is airport body-scan radiation a health risk?

Authors:  Jerry M Cuttler
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Potential treatment of inflammatory and proliferative diseases by ultra-low doses of ionizing radiations.

Authors:  Charles L Sanders
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Commentary on the appropriate radiation level for evacuations.

Authors:  Jerry M Cuttler
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Environment and air pollution: health services bequeath to grotesque menace.

Authors:  Muhammad Imran Qureshi; Amran Md Rasli; Usama Awan; Jian Ma; Ghulam Ali; Arif Alam; Faiza Sajjad; Khalid Zaman
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Enhancement of antitumor immunity by low-dose total body irradiationis associated with selectively decreasing the proportion and number of T regulatory cells.

Authors:  Rongjun Liu; Shudao Xiong; Lei Zhang; Yiwei Chu
Journal:  Cell Mol Immunol       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 11.530

7.  Radiation hormesis: historical perspective and implications for low-dose cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Alexander M Vaiserman
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Additive protection by LDR and FGF21 treatment against diabetic nephropathy in type 2 diabetes model.

Authors:  Minglong Shao; Lechu Yu; Fangfang Zhang; Xuemian Lu; Xiaokun Li; Peng Cheng; Xiufei Lin; Luqing He; Shunzi Jin; Yi Tan; Hong Yang; Chi Zhang; Lu Cai
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 4.310

Review 9.  Current knowledge on tumour induction by computed tomography should be carefully used.

Authors:  Cristian Candela-Juan; Alegría Montoro; Enrique Ruiz-Martínez; Juan Ignacio Villaescusa; Luis Martí-Bonmatí
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Correcting systemic deficiencies in our scientific infrastructure.

Authors:  Mohan Doss
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.