Literature DB >> 18640295

Geographic variation of bone mineral density and selected risk factors for prediction of incident fracture among Canadians 50 and older.

Lisa Langsetmo1, David A Hanley, Nancy Kreiger, Sophie A Jamal, Jerilynn Prior, Jonathan D Adachi, K Shawn Davison, Christopher Kovacs, Tassos Anastassiades, Alan Tenenhouse, David Goltzman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Striking geographic variation in the incidence of osteoporotic fracture has been shown in national and international studies. The contributing risk factors for this variation are not fully understood.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the geographic variation of bone mineral density (BMD) values, prevalent low-trauma fracture, prior falls, and vertebral deformity and to determine how this variation is related to the geographic variation of incident low-trauma fracture.
METHODS: We studied incident fracture among 2484 men and 6093 women ages 50 and older from CaMos, a randomly-selected population-based longitudinal cohort recruited from within 50 kilometers of nine cities across Canada. Analyses included up to an eight-year follow-up.
RESULTS: Estimates of fracture incidence are all age-standardized and given per 1000 person-years and CI denotes confidence interval. Among men, the lowest incidence of low-trauma fracture was 3.2 (95% CI: 1.1-7.5) in Quebec and the highest was 11.9 (95% CI: 7.1-18.6) in Calgary, compared with an overall incidence of 7.2 (95% CI: 5.8-8.7). Among women, the lowest incidence of low-trauma fracture was 11.5 (95% CI: 8.5-15.1) in Halifax and the highest was 18.5 (95% CI: 14.6-23.3) in Calgary, compared with an overall incidence of 15.3 (95% CI: 14.1-16.7). The regional variation in low-trauma fractures was similar to variation in hip fracture incidence among women (Pearson correlation, r=0.46 to 0.76) but not men (r=-0.06 to 0.05). We noted significant geographic variation in the prevalence of low BMD, as defined by BMD T-score< or =-2.5, however this variation was not directly related to low-trauma fractures or other risk factors. Furthermore, a model including age, BMD, falls, vertebral deformity, and prior clinical fracture was a good predictor of geographic variation of low-trauma fracture incidence in both men (r=0.66) and women (r=0.84).
CONCLUSIONS: For both men and women, the burden of low-trauma fracture is not related to the prevalence of osteoporosis as defined by BMD, but is related to a more comprehensive assessment of fracture risk including the following: age, BMD, falls, prior fracture, and vertebral deformity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18640295      PMCID: PMC5101048          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  35 in total

1.  Population-based geographic variations in DXA bone density in Europe: the EVOS Study. European Vertebral Osteoporosis.

Authors:  M Lunt; D Felsenberg; J Adams; L Benevolenskaya; J Cannata; J Dequeker; C Dodenhof; J A Falch; O Johnell; K T Khaw; P Masaryk; H Pols; G Poor; D Reid; C Scheidt-Nave; K Weber; A J Silman; J Reeve
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Population-based analysis of the relationship of whole bone strength indices and fall-related loads to age- and sex-specific patterns of hip and wrist fractures.

Authors:  B Lawrence Riggs; L Joseph Melton; Richard A Robb; Jon J Camp; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Ann L Oberg; Peggy A Rouleau; Cynthia H McCollough; Sundeep Khosla; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-10-31       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Hip fracture incidence in Lund, Sweden, 1966-1986.

Authors:  G B Jarnlo; B Jakobsson; L Ceder; K G Thorngren
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1989-06

4.  Low BMD is less predictive than reported falls for future limb fractures in women across Europe: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  S Kaptoge; L I Benevolenskaya; A K Bhalla; J B Cannata; S Boonen; J A Falch; D Felsenberg; J D Finn; R Nuti; K Hoszowski; R Lorenc; T Miazgowski; I Jajic; G Lyritis; P Masaryk; M Naves-Diaz; G Poor; D M Reid; C Scheidt-Nave; J J Stepan; C J Todd; K Weber; A D Woolf; D K Roy; M Lunt; S R Pye; T W O'neill; A J Silman; J Reeve
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Estimation of the prevalence of low bone density in Canadian women and men using a population-specific DXA reference standard: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos).

Authors:  A Tenenhouse; L Joseph; N Kreiger; S Poliquin; T M Murray; L Blondeau; C Berger; D A Hanley; J C Prior
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Bone density variation and its effects on risk of vertebral deformity in men and women studied in thirteen European centers: the EVOS Study.

Authors:  M Lunt; D Felsenberg; J Reeve; L Benevolenskaya; J Cannata; J Dequeker; C Dodenhof; J A Falch; P Masaryk; H A Pols; G Poor; D M Reid; C Scheidt-Nave; K Weber; J Varlow; J A Kanis; T W O'Neill; A J Silman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Age- and gender-specific rate of fractures in Australia: a population-based study.

Authors:  K M Sanders; E Seeman; A M Ugoni; J A Pasco; T J Martin; B Skoric; G C Nicholson; M A Kotowicz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Higher bone mineral density in rural compared with urban dwellers: the NOREPOS study.

Authors:  H E Meyer; G K R Berntsen; A J Søgaard; A Langhammer; B Schei; V Fønnebø; S Forsmo; G S Tell
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  International variations in hip fracture probabilities: implications for risk assessment.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Olof Johnell; Chris De Laet; Bengt Jonsson; Anders Oden; Alan K Ogelsby
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Multiple imputation to account for missing data in a survey: estimating the prevalence of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Andrew Kmetic; Lawrence Joseph; Claudie Berger; Alan Tenenhouse
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.822

View more
  14 in total

1.  Normative bone mineral density z-scores for Canadians aged 16 to 24 years: the Canadian Multicenter Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  Wei Zhou; Lisa Langsetmo; Claudie Berger; Jonathan D Adachi; Alexandra Papaioannou; George Ioannidis; Colin Webber; Stephanie A Atkinson; Wojciech P Olszynski; Jacques P Brown; David A Hanley; Robert Josse; Nancy Kreiger; Jerilynn Prior; Stephanie Kaiser; Susan Kirkland; David Goltzman; Kenneth Shawn Davison
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 2.617

2.  Predicting fracture using 2D finite element modelling.

Authors:  J A M MacNeil; J D Adachi; D Goltzman; R G Josse; C S Kovacs; J C Prior; W Olszynski; K S Davison; S M Kaiser
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.242

3.  Ankle fractures do not predict osteoporotic fractures in women with or without diabetes.

Authors:  J M Pritchard; L M Giangregorio; G Ioannidis; A Papaioannou; J D Adachi; W D Leslie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Peripheral quantitative computed tomography-derived muscle density and peripheral magnetic resonance imaging-derived muscle adiposity: precision and associations with fragility fractures in women.

Authors:  A K O Wong; K A Beattie; K K H Min; C Gordon; L Pickard; A Papaioannou; J D Adachi
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.041

Review 5.  Temporal trends in the incidence of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  S N Morin; L M Lix; S R Majumdar; W D Leslie
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  Bone mineral density and incidence of hip fracture in Swedish urban and rural women 1987-2002.

Authors:  Björn E Rosengren; Henrik G Ahlborg; Per Gärdsell; Ingemar Sernbo; Robin M Daly; Jan-Ake Nilsson; Magnus K Karlsson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 7.  Prevention of osteoporosis-related fractures among postmenopausal women and older men.

Authors:  Poupak Rahmani; Suzanne Morin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-10-19       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Comparative trends in incident fracture rates for all long-term care and community-dwelling seniors in Ontario, Canada, 2002-2012.

Authors:  A Papaioannou; C C Kennedy; G Ioannidis; C Cameron; R Croxford; J D Adachi; S Mursleen; S Jaglal
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Population-based Canadian hip fracture rates with international comparisons.

Authors:  W D Leslie; S O'Donnell; C Lagacé; P Walsh; C Bancej; S Jean; K Siminoski; S Kaiser; D L Kendler; S Jaglal
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-10-03       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Peak bone mass from longitudinal data: implications for the prevalence, pathophysiology, and diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Claudie Berger; David Goltzman; Lisa Langsetmo; Lawrence Joseph; Stuart Jackson; Nancy Kreiger; Alan Tenenhouse; K Shawn Davison; Robert G Josse; Jerilynn C Prior; David A Hanley
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.