Literature DB >> 21562874

Ankle fractures do not predict osteoporotic fractures in women with or without diabetes.

J M Pritchard1, L M Giangregorio, G Ioannidis, A Papaioannou, J D Adachi, W D Leslie.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: It is not clear whether ankle fractures predict future osteoporotic fractures in women, and whether diabetes influences this relationship. We found that a prior ankle fracture does not predict subsequent osteoporotic fractures in women with or without diabetes.
INTRODUCTION: We aimed to determine: (1) whether a prior ankle fracture was a risk factor for a subsequent major osteoporotic fracture in older women; (2) whether this risk was modified by the presence of diabetes; (3) the risk factors for ankle fracture in older women.
METHODS: We identified 3,054 women age 50 years and older with diabetes and 9,151 matched controls using the Manitoba Bone Density Program database. Multivariable regression models were used to examine factors associated with prior ankle fracture, and the importance of prior ankle fracture as a predictor of subsequent major osteoporotic fracture during a mean 4.8 years of observation.
RESULTS: A prior ankle fracture was not a significant predictor of subsequent major osteoporotic fracture for women with diabetes (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-1.83; p = 0.623) or women without diabetes (HR 1.16; 95% CI, 0.79-1.71; p = 0.460), and there was no interaction between diabetes and ankle fracture after pooling all women in the cohort (p = 0.971). The presence of diabetes was not independently associated with prior ankle fracture (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.14 [95% CI, 0.93-1.38], p = 0.200), whereas higher body mass index (adjusted OR 1.04 per standard deviation increase [95% CI, 1.03-1.06], p < 0.001), previous major osteoporotic fracture (adjusted OR 1.40 [95% CI, 1.13-1.75], p = 0.002), and multiple comorbidities (>6 ambulatory diagnostic groups) (adjusted OR 1.81 [95% CI, 1.40-2.36], p < 0.001) were related to prior ankle fracture.
CONCLUSIONS: Ankle fracture was not a significant predictor of major osteoporotic fracture in women, and a diagnosis of diabetes did not influence the relationship.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21562874      PMCID: PMC5101066          DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1648-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  39 in total

1.  2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary.

Authors:  Alexandra Papaioannou; Suzanne Morin; Angela M Cheung; Stephanie Atkinson; Jacques P Brown; Sidney Feldman; David A Hanley; Anthony Hodsman; Sophie A Jamal; Stephanie M Kaiser; Brent Kvern; Kerry Siminoski; William D Leslie
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds.

Authors:  J A Kanis; A Oden; O Johnell; B Jonsson; C de Laet; A Dawson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  The interaction of ethnicity and chronic disease as risk factors for osteoporotic fractures: a comparison in Canadian Aboriginals and non-Aboriginals.

Authors:  W D Leslie; S Derksen; H J Prior; L M Lix; C Metge; J O'neil
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Algorithm for the management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Ronald C Hamdy; Sanford Baim; Susan B Broy; E Michael Lewiecki; Sarah L Morgan; S Bobo Tanner; Howard F Williamson
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.954

5.  A prospective case-control study of ankle fracture in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  P Y Ho; N Tang; S W Law; H F Tsui; T P Lam; K S Leung
Journal:  Hong Kong Med J       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.227

6.  Type 1 and type 2 diabetes and incident hip fractures in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  K K Nicodemus; A R Folsom
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Impact of type 1 and type 2 diabetes on patterns and costs of drug prescribing: a population-based study.

Authors:  J M Evans; T M MacDonald; G P Leese; D A Ruta; A D Morris
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Construction and validation of a simplified fracture risk assessment tool for Canadian women and men: results from the CaMos and Manitoba cohorts.

Authors:  W D Leslie; C Berger; L Langsetmo; L M Lix; J D Adachi; D A Hanley; G Ioannidis; R G Josse; C S Kovacs; T Towheed; S Kaiser; W P Olszynski; J C Prior; S Jamal; N Kreiger; D Goltzman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  The importance of spectrum bias on bone density monitoring in clinical practice.

Authors:  William D Leslie
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; H Johansson; E McCloskey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  [Ankle fractures in older patients : What should we do differently?]

Authors:  Sabine Ochman; Michael J Raschke
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Prediction of hip osteoporosis by DXA using a novel pulse-echo ultrasound device.

Authors:  J T Schousboe; O Riekkinen; J Karjalainen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Prior ankle fractures in postmenopausal women are associated with low areal bone mineral density and bone microstructure alterations.

Authors:  E Biver; C Durosier; T Chevalley; F R Herrmann; S Ferrari; R Rizzoli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  [Treatment of fractures of the ankle in the elderly].

Authors:  H Zwipp; M Amlang
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Is ankle fracture related to low bone mineral density and subsequent fracture? A systematic review.

Authors:  Atiporn Therdyothin; Nacharin Phiphopthatsanee; Wiwat Wajanavisit; Patarawan Woratanarat; Sukij Laohajaroensombat; Tulyapruek Tawonsawatruk
Journal:  Osteoporos Sarcopenia       Date:  2020-09-13

6.  A retrospective review of lower extremity fracture care in patients with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Titilola Akhigbe; Amy S Chin; Jelena N Svircev; Helen Hoenig; Stephen P Burns; Frances M Weaver; Lauren Bailey; Laura Carbone
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  Discordant pattern of peripheral fractures in diabetes: a meta-analysis on the risk of wrist and ankle fractures.

Authors:  T Vilaca; J Walsh; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  We miss the opportunity: Pretreament of osteoporosis in a German trauma center.

Authors:  Valentin Rausch; Andreas Schwarzer; Johannes W Dietrich; Miriam Kaisler; Dominik Seybold; Jan Vollert; Thomas A Schildhauer; Christoph Maier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Operatively treated ankle fractures in Switzerland, 2002-2012: epidemiology and associations between baseline characteristics and fracture types.

Authors:  Diogo Vieira Cardoso; Victor Dubois-Ferrière; Axel Gamulin; Christophe Baréa; Pablo Rodriguez; Didier Hannouche; Anne Lübbeke
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Type 2 diabetes and risk of low-energy fractures in postmenopausal women: meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Joanna Dytfeld; Michał Michalak
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.636

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.