Literature DB >> 21959170

Predicting fracture using 2D finite element modelling.

J A M MacNeil1, J D Adachi, D Goltzman, R G Josse, C S Kovacs, J C Prior, W Olszynski, K S Davison, S M Kaiser.   

Abstract

A decrease in bone density at the hip or spine has been shown to increase the risk of fracture. A limitation of the bone mineral density (BMD) measurement is that it provides only a measure of a bone sample's average density when projected onto a 2D surface. Effectively, what determines bone fracture is whether an applied load exceeds ultimate strength, with both bone tissue material properties (can be approximated through bone density), and geometry playing a role. The goal of this project was to use bone geometry and BMD obtained from radiographs and DXA measurements respectively to estimate fracture risk, using a two-dimensional finite element model (FEM) of the sagittal plane of lumbar vertebrae. The Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos) data was used for this study. There were 4194 men and women over the age of 50 years, with 786 having fractures. Each subject had BMD testing and radiographs of their lumbar vertebrae. A single two dimensional FEM of the first to fourth lumbar vertebra was automatically generated for each subject. Bone tissue stiffness was assigned based on the BMD of the individual vertebrae, and adjusted for patient age. Axial compression boundary conditions were applied with a force proportional to body mass. The resulting overall strain from the applied force was found. Men and women were analyzed separately. At baseline, the sensitivity of BMD to predict fragility fractures in women and men was 3.77% and 0.86%, while the sensitivity of FEM to predict fragility fractures for women and men was 10.8% and 11.3%. The FEM ROC curve demonstrated better performance compared to BMD. The relative risk of being considered at high fracture risk using FEM at baseline, was a better predictor of 5 year incident fragility fracture risk compared to BMD.
Copyright © 2011 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21959170      PMCID: PMC4071042          DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  28 in total

1.  Biomechanics of lumbar vertebrae as a functionally optimal structure.

Authors:  S C Fan; D N Ghista; K Ramakrishna
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2005

2.  Vertebral body shape variation in the thoracic and lumbar spine: characterization of its asymmetry and wedging.

Authors:  Youssef Masharawi; Khalil Salame; Yigal Mirovsky; Smadar Peleg; Gali Dar; Nili Steinberg; Israel Hershkovitz
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.414

3.  Image-based strength assessment of bone.

Authors:  Thomas N Hangartner
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2007

4.  In vivo intradiscal pressure measurement in healthy individuals and in patients with ongoing back problems.

Authors:  K Sato; S Kikuchi; T Yonezawa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Estimation of the prevalence of low bone density in Canadian women and men using a population-specific DXA reference standard: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos).

Authors:  A Tenenhouse; L Joseph; N Kreiger; S Poliquin; T M Murray; L Blondeau; C Berger; D A Hanley; J C Prior
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Relationship between axial and bending behaviors of the human thoracolumbar vertebra.

Authors:  R Paul Crawford; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Bone strength at the distal radius can be estimated from high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography and the finite element method.

Authors:  Joshua A Macneil; Steven K Boyd
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Factors associated with falls in the elderly: a community study.

Authors:  D Prudham; J G Evans
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 10.668

10.  The osteoporosis care gap in men with fragility fractures: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  A Papaioannou; C C Kennedy; G Ioannidis; Y Gao; A M Sawka; D Goltzman; A Tenenhouse; L Pickard; W P Olszynski; K S Davison; S Kaiser; R G Josse; N Kreiger; D A Hanley; J C Prior; J P Brown; T Anastassiades; J D Adachi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Finite Element-Based Mechanical Assessment of Bone Quality on the Basis of In Vivo Images.

Authors:  Dieter H Pahr; Philippe K Zysset
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  Male osteoporosis: A review.

Authors:  Antonio Herrera; Antonio Lobo-Escolar; Jesús Mateo; Jorge Gil; Elena Ibarz; Luis Gracia
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2012-12-18

3.  Prediction of femoral strength using 3D finite element models reconstructed from DXA images: validation against experiments.

Authors:  Lorenzo Grassi; Sami P Väänänen; Matti Ristinmaa; Jukka S Jurvelin; Hanna Isaksson
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2016-12-21

4.  A new finite element based parameter to predict bone fracture.

Authors:  Chiara Colombo; Flavia Libonati; Luca Rinaudo; Martina Bellazzi; Fabio Massimo Ulivieri; Laura Vergani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  In Silico Finite Element Modeling of Stress Distribution in Osteosynthesis after Pertrochanteric Fractures.

Authors:  Jacek Lorkowski; Mieczyslaw Pokorski
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  A mechanical model for predicting the probability of osteoporotic hip fractures based in DXA measurements and finite element simulation.

Authors:  Enrique López; Elena Ibarz; Antonio Herrera; Jesús Mateo; Antonio Lobo-Escolar; Sergio Puértolas; Luis Gracia
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 2.819

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.