Literature DB >> 25246517

A Recommendation on How to Analyze In-Room PET for In Vivo Proton Range Verification Using a Distal PET Surface Method.

Chul Hee Min1, Xuping Zhu2, Kira Grogg2, Georges El Fakhri2, Brian Winey3, Harald Paganetti4.   

Abstract

We describe the rationale and implementation of a method for analyzing in-room positron emission tomography (PET) data to verify the proton beam range. The method is based on analyzing distal PET surfaces after passive scattering proton beam delivery. Typically in vivo range verification is done by comparing measured and predicted PET distribution for a single activity level at a selected activity line along the beam passage. In the method presented here, we suggest using a middle point method based on dual PET activity levels to minimize the uncertainty due to local variations in the PET activity. Furthermore, we introduce 2-dimensional (2D) PET activity level surfaces based on 3-dimensional maps of the PET activities along the beam passage. This allows determining not only average range differences but also range difference distributions as well as root mean square deviations (RMSDs) for a more comprehensive range analysis. The method is demonstrated using data from 8 patients who were scanned with an in-room PET scanner. For each of the 8 patients, the average range difference was less than 5 mm and the RMSD was 4 to 11 mm between the measured and simulated PET activity level surfaces for single-field treatments. An ongoing protocol at our institution allows the use of a single field for patients being imaged for the PET range verification study at 1 fraction during their treatment course. Visualizing the range difference distributions using the PET surfaces offers a convenient visual verification of range uncertainties in 2D. Using the distal activity level surfaces of simulated and measured PET distributions at the middle of 25% and 50% activity level is a robust method for in vivo range verification.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Monte Carlo simulation; distal PET surface; in vivo range; in-room PET; proton therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25246517      PMCID: PMC4898041          DOI: 10.1177/1533034614547457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 1533-0338


  15 in total

1.  On-line monitoring of radiotherapy beams: experimental results with proton beams.

Authors:  D W Litzenberg; D A Roberts; M Y Lee; K Pham; A M Vander Molen; R Ronningen; F D Becchetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Dose quantification from in-beam positron emission tomography.

Authors:  W Enghardt; K Parodi; P Crespo; F Fiedler; J Pawelke; F Pönisch
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Visualization and Transport of Positron Emission from Proton Activation in vivo.

Authors:  G W Bennett; J O Archambeau; B E Archambeau; J I Meltzer; C L Wingate
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-06-09       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Proton dose monitoring with PET: quantitative studies in Lucite.

Authors:  U Oelfke; G K Lam; M S Atkins
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Implementation and workflow for PET monitoring of therapeutic ion irradiation: a comparison of in-beam, in-room, and off-line techniques.

Authors:  Georgy Shakirin; Henning Braess; Fine Fiedler; Daniela Kunath; Kristin Laube; Katia Parodi; Marlen Priegnitz; Wolfgang Enghardt
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Monitoring proton radiation therapy with in-room PET imaging.

Authors:  Xuping Zhu; Samuel España; Juliane Daartz; Norbert Liebsch; Jinsong Ouyang; Harald Paganetti; Thomas R Bortfeld; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Hongyu Jiang; Katia Parodi; Roelf Slopsema; Martijn Engelsman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Clinical application of in-room positron emission tomography for in vivo treatment monitoring in proton radiation therapy.

Authors:  Chul Hee Min; Xuping Zhu; Brian A Winey; Kira Grogg; Mauro Testa; Georges El Fakhri; Thomas R Bortfeld; Harald Paganetti; Helen A Shih
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 9.  Range uncertainties in proton therapy and the role of Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Patient study of in vivo verification of beam delivery and range, using positron emission tomography and computed tomography imaging after proton therapy.

Authors:  Katia Parodi; Harald Paganetti; Helen A Shih; Susan Michaud; Jay S Loeffler; Thomas F DeLaney; Norbert J Liebsch; John E Munzenrider; Alan J Fischman; Antje Knopf; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  3 in total

1.  Feasibility study of using fall-off gradients of early and late PET scans for proton range verification.

Authors:  Jongmin Cho; Kira Grogg; Chul Hee Min; Xuping Zhu; Harald Paganetti; Hyun Cheol Lee; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A Comparative Study of Two In Vivo PET Verification Methods in Clinical Cases.

Authors:  Junyu Zhang; Yan Lu; Yinxiangzi Sheng; Weiwei Wang; Zhengshan Hong; Yun Sun; Rong Zhou; Jingyi Cheng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Evaluation of Proton Therapy Accuracy Using a PMMA Phantom and PET Prediction Module.

Authors:  Junyu Zhang; Yan Lu; Wenchien Hsi; Jiangang Zhang; Yinxiangzi Sheng; Leijun Shi; Weiwei Wang; Jiade Lu; Rong Zhou; Jingyi Cheng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 6.244

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.