Literature DB >> 18618213

Navigation did not improve the precision of minimally invasive knee arthroplasty.

Peter M Bonutti1, Daniel A Dethmers, Mike S McGrath, Slif D Ulrich, Michael A Mont.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Potential advantages of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (TKA) include decreased pain, faster recovery, and increased quadriceps muscle strength. Computer-assisted navigation has been associated with more accurate component alignment. We evaluated two groups of 50 patients who had minimally invasive TKAs performed with and without navigation by two surgeons. A comparison of 50 previous TKAs by each of the two surgeons showed similar results. The mean operative times for the navigation and nonnavigation groups were 112 minutes (range, 63-297 minutes) and 54 minutes (range, 35-86 minutes), respectively. The mean estimated blood losses, mean Knee Society pain as well as functional scores and mean component alignments were similar. The number of knees that deviated by more than 3 degrees from the normal anatomic axis was three and one in the navigated and nonnavigated groups, respectively. Complication rates were 6% and 4% in the navigated and nonnavigated groups, respectively. Our data demonstrate no distinct advantage of navigation when combined with a minimally invasive approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18618213      PMCID: PMC2565029          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0359-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  41 in total

1.  Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: the importance of instrumentation.

Authors:  Alfred J Tria
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.472

2.  Experiences with computer navigated total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Zoltán Bejek; László Sólyom; Miklós Szendrõi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-11-04       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Accuracy of implant alignment and early results after minimally invasive vs conventional OrthoPilot-navigated Columbus TKA.

Authors:  Frank Lampe; Karina Bohlen; Sebastian P M Dries; Anusch Sufi-Siavach; Ekkehard Hille
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.390

4.  Survival analysis of a cementless, cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Clinical and radiographic assessment 10 to 13 years after surgery.

Authors:  H Watanabe; S Akizuki; T Takizawa
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-08

5.  The impact of minimally invasive surgical techniques on early range of motion after primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Craig M McAllister; Jeff D Stepanian
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Minimally invasive versus standard approach in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yasutaka Tashiro; Hiromasa Miura; Shuichi Matsuda; Ken Okazaki; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Alignment and orientation of the components in total knee replacement with and without navigation support: a prospective, randomised study.

Authors:  Y-H Kim; J-S Kim; S-H Yoon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-04

8.  The cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Erik J Novak; Marc D Silverstein; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Excellent survival of all-polyethylene tibial components in a community joint registry.

Authors:  Terence J Gioe; Penny Sinner; Susan Mehle; Wenjun Ma; Kathleen K Killeen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty using the suspended leg technique.

Authors:  Peter M Bonutti; David J Neal; Mark A Kester
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  12 in total

1.  The risk of notching the anterior femoral cortex with the use of navigation systems in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yukihide Minoda; Akio Kobayashi; Hiroyoshi Iwaki; Ikebuchi Mitsuhiko; Yoshinori Kadoya; Hirotsugu Ohashi; Kunio Takaoka; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Does minimally invasive surgery improve short-term recovery in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Tao Cheng; Tao Liu; Guoyou Zhang; Xiaochun Peng; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-03-13       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  [Computer-assisted total knee replacement (TKR) using Orthopilot navigation system].

Authors:  Michael N Magin
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 4.  Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty is currently of no proven clinical benefit: a systematic review.

Authors:  R Stephen J Burnett; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Influence of computer navigation on TKA revision rates.

Authors:  Christoph Schnurr; Isabell Güdden; Peer Eysel; Dietmar Pierre König
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: comparison of jig-based technique versus computer navigation for clinical and alignment outcome.

Authors:  Masahiro Hasegawa; Kakunoshin Yoshida; Hiroki Wakabayashi; Akihiro Sudo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA.

Authors:  Vincent Y Ng; Jeffrey H DeClaire; Keith R Berend; Bethany C Gulick; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Clinical, radiological and survivorship results after ten years comparing navigated and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a matched-pair analysis.

Authors:  Clemens Baier; Jochen Wolfsteiner; Franziska Otto; Florian Zeman; Tobias Renkawitz; Hans-Robert Springorum; Günther Maderbacher; Joachim Grifka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty marketing and patient education: an evaluation of quality, content and accuracy of related websites.

Authors:  Shai S Shemesh; Michael J Bronson; Calin S Moucha
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Custom-fit minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: effect on blood loss and early clinical outcomes.

Authors:  M Pietsch; O Djahani; Ch Zweiger; F Plattner; R Radl; Ch Tschauner; S Hofmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.