Literature DB >> 20349171

[Computer-assisted total knee replacement (TKR) using Orthopilot navigation system].

Michael N Magin1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Reproducible, precise implantation of a bicondylar knee prosthesis considering size of implant, axial conditions in coronal and sagittal planes, rotation, and ligament tension in extension and flexion. INDICATIONS: Progressive painful gonarthrosis, when conservative treatment is no longer an option. Revision of unicondylar prosthesis. CONTRAINDICATIONS: General contraindications to bicondylar knee replacement. Revision after bicondylar replacement. Severe limitation of hip joint mobility, e.g., after arthrodesis of the hip joint or ipsilateral hip joint ankylosis. Morbid obesity. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Approach to the knee joint for alloarthroplasty. Placement of the screws and fixation of the infrared reflectors at femur and tibia. After adjustment of the double camera, collection of kinematic data via standardized motion patterns and identification of predetermined anatomic landmarks at the knee and ankle joint. By means of this data, controlled resection of the tibia, determination of the ligament tension in extension and flexion, planning of the femoral osteotomies, controlled distal resection of the femur. Following intraoperative verification of the distal femur resection, navigation of the position of the femur to complete femoral resection. Placement of the trial components, determination of the tibial onlay thickness, adjustment of the rotation of the tibial component, and final preparation of the tibial shaft. Preparation of the patella by resection of osteophytes, denervation, and possibly onlay patellar resection using a saw. Finally, implantation of the tibial component (cemented or noncemented), the tibial onlay, the femoral component (cemented or noncemented), and possibly cementation of the patellar onlay. After hardening, control of knee movement in straight position and wound closure in layers. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Early functional treatment using continuous passive motion device. Pain-adapted increase of weight bearing. Low-molecular-weight heparin for 5-6 weeks.
RESULTS: Meanwhile, several studies have demonstrated that computer navigation helps to provide more accuracy in implant positioning, compared with conventional techniques in total knee replacement. Long-term survival of the implants promises to be superior after physiological leg axis restoration. Own results: 100 consecutive implantations: average duration of surgery 80 min, blood loss 360 ml, one deep infection (healed after early revision), one arthrofibrosis requiring revision surgery, average range of motion on the day of discharge 110 degrees in flexion (90-120 degrees) and full extension, after 3 months average 125 degrees in flexion (90-140 degrees). No clinical signs of instability. Postoperative radiologic evaluation with standard radiographs of the knee joint in coronal and sagittal planes took place right after surgery and again after 3 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20349171     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-010-3007-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  19 in total

1.  Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique.

Authors:  H Bäthis; L Perlick; M Tingart; C Lüring; D Zurakowski; J Grifka
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-07

2.  Blood loss after total knee replacement: effects of computer-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Y Kalairajah; D Simpson; A J Cossey; G M Verrall; A J Spriggins
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-11

3.  Consistency of implantation of a total knee arthroplasty with a non-image-based navigation system: a case-control study of 235 cases compared with 235 conventionally implanted prostheses.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Jenny; Ulrich Clemens; Steffen Kohler; Hartmuth Kiefer; Werner Konermann; Rolf K Miehlke
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  [Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty and navigation - a logical combination?].

Authors:  C Lüring; M Tingart; J Beckmann; L Perlick; J Grifka
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Learning curve in navigated total knee replacement. A multi-centre study comparing experienced and beginner centres.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Jenny; Rolf K Miehlke; Alexander Giurea
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement: a comparative, prospective, randomised study with radiological and CT evaluation.

Authors:  J Lützner; F Krummenauer; C Wolf; K-P Günther; S Kirschner
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-08

Review 7.  [Are computer assisted total knee replacements more accurately placed? A meta-analysis of comparative studies].

Authors:  H Bäthis; S Shafizadeh; T Paffrath; C Simanski; J Grifka; C Lüring
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  When computer-assisted knee replacement is the best alternative.

Authors:  Thomas K Fehring; J Bohannon Mason; Joseph Moskal; David C Pollock; John Mann; Vincent J Williams
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Computer navigation versus conventional implantation for varus knee total arthroplasty: a case-control study at 5 years follow-up.

Authors:  Luigi Molfetta; Davide Caldo
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  The cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Erik J Novak; Marc D Silverstein; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  5 in total

1.  [Soft tissue balanced navigation of total knee arthroplasties].

Authors:  C Schnurr; I Stolzenberg; J Nessler; P Eysel; P König
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  [Denervation of the patella: influence on mid-term results after total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  M Handel; S Riedt; P Lechler; J Schaumburger; F X Köck; S Sell
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  [Early effectiveness of computer navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Houyi Sun; Kai Zheng; Weicheng Zhang; Ning Li; Lianfang Zhang; Jun Zhou; Yaozeng Xu; Rongqun Li
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-10-15

4.  The effects of immediate programmed cryotherapy and continuous passive motion in patients after computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mei-Chu Chen; Chiu-Chu Lin; Jih-Yang Ko; Feng-Chih Kuo
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  NAVIGATION IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY.

Authors:  Roberto Freire da Mota E Albuquerque
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-11-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.