Literature DB >> 18615945

Retention of screened women in the Manitoba Breast Screening Program.

Kathleen M Decker1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The retention rate or the percentage of women who return to screening within 30 months of a previous screening is an important measure of screening success and the acceptability of the screening program to women. The objective of this study was to investigate variables associated with the retention of women 50 to 68 years of age who were screened by the Manitoba Breast Screening Program (MBSP) during 2002 and 2003.
METHODS: All women screened by the MBSP in 2002 and 2003 who were eligible for rescreening in 2 years were included in the study. Data were extracted from the MBSP database which contains demographic, screening, diagnostic follow-up, and diagnosis information for all women screened by the program. Contingency tables, chi2 tests, and logistic regression were used to investigate variables that were associated with retention.
RESULTS: Retention was related to screen type (first or return), screen result (normal or abnormal), family history of breast cancer (risk or no risk), education (less than grade 9 or some high school or more), and ethnicity (Asian, First Nations, other). Retention was not related to residence (rural or urban).
CONCLUSIONS: Overall screening retention at the MBSP was 80% which meets national standards. However, additional efforts may be required to improve the retention rate of Asian and First Nations women as well as women who had an abnormal screening result or less than a grade 9 level of education.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18615945      PMCID: PMC6975659     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Public Health        ISSN: 0008-4263


  12 in total

1.  Validating and improving models for projecting the absolute risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  M H Gail; J P Costantino
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-03-07       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Compliance with the screening mammography program of British Columbia: will she return?

Authors:  M M Johnson; T G Hislop; L Kan; A J Coldman; A Lai
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1996 May-Jun

3.  Factors associated with women's adherence to mammography screening guidelines.

Authors:  K A Phillips; K Kerlikowske; L C Baker; S W Chang; M L Brown
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Effect of false-positive mammograms on interval breast cancer screening in a health maintenance organization.

Authors:  M L Burman; S H Taplin; D F Herta; J G Elmore
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Predictors of non-attendance for second round mammography in an Australian mammographic screening programme.

Authors:  A M O'Byrne; A M Kavanagh; A Ugoni; F Diver
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.136

6.  Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  K Kerlikowske; D Grady; S M Rubin; C Sandrock; V L Ernster
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-01-11       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Satisfaction of women attending the Manitoba breast screening program.

Authors:  K M Decker; M Harrison; R B Tate
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Screening behavior of women after a false-positive mammogram.

Authors:  E D Pisano; J Earp; M Schell; K Vokaty; A Denham
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Once is enough--why some women do not continue to participate in a breast cancer screening programme.

Authors:  M Elwood; B McNoe; T Smith; M Bandaranayake; T C Doyle
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1998-05-22

10.  Mammography adherence and psychological distress among women at risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  C Lerman; M Daly; C Sands; A Balshem; E Lustbader; T Heggan; L Goldstein; J James; P Engstrom
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-07-07       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  2 in total

1.  A model of the influence of false-positive mammography screening results on subsequent screening.

Authors:  Jessica T Defrank; Noel Brewer
Journal:  Health Psychol Rev       Date:  2010

2.  Retention strategies in longitudinal cohort studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Samantha Teague; George J Youssef; Jacqui A Macdonald; Emma Sciberras; Adrian Shatte; Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz; Chris Greenwood; Jennifer McIntosh; Craig A Olsson; Delyse Hutchinson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 4.615

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.