Literature DB >> 10419795

Satisfaction of women attending the Manitoba breast screening program.

K M Decker1, M Harrison, R B Tate.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the satisfaction of women who attended the Manitoba Breast Screening Program (MBSP) during the first 17 months of operation and examined differences in satisfaction by screening location and screening result. The setting was the province of Manitoba, Canada.
METHODS: A breast screening program satisfaction questionnaire comprising six subscales was mailed to 1,331 randomly chosen women in five different categories who attended the MBSP. Four categories were based on location of screen (city of Brandon vs city of Winnipeg) and screen result (normal vs abnormal) and one category comprised women who were screened at a mobile unit. Eighty-eight percent of all questionnaires were returned. Data analyses included analyses of variance to examine the effect of location and result on satisfaction scores and logistic regression to explore the variables associated with reported satisfied and not satisfied responses to each satisfaction subscale.
RESULTS: All satisfaction scores were above 80 of 100, indicating high levels of satisfaction. A significant difference in satisfaction scores between women in Winnipeg and women in Brandon was found for the convenience and accessibility (P = 0.0153) and the information transfer subscales (P = 0.0150). A significant difference was found between women with abnormal and women with normal screen results for all subscales (P < 0.01). Women were 4.5 times more likely to be dissatisfied on the general satisfaction subscale if they had an abnormal screen result (95% CI 1.9,10.4).
CONCLUSIONS: High levels of satisfaction were reported for all aspects of screening at the MBSP. However, women were less likely to be satisfied with program convenience and accessibility. Women with an abnormal result reported lower levels of satisfaction on all subscales. Some women with an abnormal screening result were confused about what their results meant and why they were sent for additional diagnostic tests. As a result of these findings, numerous changes were made to the MBSP. Copyright 1999 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10419795     DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1999.0497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  7 in total

1.  Delivering equitable care: comparing preventive services in Manitoba.

Authors:  Sumit Gupta; Leslie L Roos; Randy Walld; Dawn Traverse; Matthew Dahl
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Retention of screened women in the Manitoba Breast Screening Program.

Authors:  Kathleen M Decker
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2008 May-Jun

3.  Knowledge, Perceptions, and Satisfaction of Moroccan Women Towards a New Breast Cancer Screening Program in Morocco.

Authors:  Hafida Charaka; Mohamed Khalis; Samira Elfakir; Inge Huybrechts; Youssef Chami Khazraji; Badiaa Lyoussi; Amr S Soliman; Chakib Nejjari
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Assessment of participant satisfaction with upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in South Korea.

Authors:  Hoo-Yeon Lee; Sun Mi Lim; Mi Ah Han; Jae Kwan Jun; Kui Son Choi; Myung-Il Hahm; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Performance of screening mammography in organized programs in Canada in 1996. The Database Management Subcommittee to the National Committee for the Canadian Breast Cancer Screening Initiative.

Authors:  D Paquette; J Snider; F Bouchard; I Olivotto; H Bryant; K Decker; G Doyle
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-10-31       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Parental experiences of the newborn hearing screening programme in Wales: a postal questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Rosemary Fox; Sally Minchom
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  An assessment of American Indian women's mammography experiences.

Authors:  Kimberly K Engelman; Christine M Daley; Byron J Gajewski; Florence Ndikum-Moffor; Babalola Faseru; Stacy Braiuca; Stephanie Joseph; Edward F Ellerbeck; K Allen Greiner
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.809

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.