Literature DB >> 9646820

Screening behavior of women after a false-positive mammogram.

E D Pisano1, J Earp, M Schell, K Vokaty, A Denham.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of a false-positive mammogram that leads to open surgical biopsy on subsequent screening mammography behavior in women.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was performed with a retrospective cohort design, and data were collected by means of telephone interview. All participants were women aged at least 50 years, with no history of breast cancer. Study patients (n = 43) were women who had an abnormal mammogram followed within 6 months by benign excisional breast biopsy. Control subjects (n = 136) were randomly selected: They included women with a normal mammogram who had not undergone biopsy, as well as women with an abnormal mammogram and the recommendation to undergo 6-month follow-up mammography.
RESULTS: Two differences between the study and control groups were statistically significant. Study patients were more likely than control patients to believe they had increased susceptibility to breast cancer (P = .039). Study patients were also more likely than control subjects to intend to undergo screening mammography annually in the future (P = .036).
CONCLUSION: A false-positive mammogram that leads to open surgical biopsy does not inhibit most women from undergoing subsequent screening mammography. In fact, such an experience may increase their intentions to undergo regular screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9646820     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.208.1.9646820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  11 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne W Fletcher; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Retention of screened women in the Manitoba Breast Screening Program.

Authors:  Kathleen M Decker
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2008 May-Jun

3.  Effect of Screening Mammography on Other Preventive Services in Older Women.

Authors:  Gary J Whitman; Scott B Cantor
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Impact of a False-Positive Screening Mammogram on Subsequent Screening Behavior and Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Firas M Dabbous; Therese A Dolecek; Michael L Berbaum; Sarah M Friedewald; Wm Thomas Summerfelt; Kent Hoskins; Garth H Rauscher
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Influence of false-positive mammography results on subsequent screening: do physician recommendations buffer negative effects?

Authors:  Jessica T DeFrank; Barbara K Rimer; J Michael Bowling; Jo Anne Earp; Erica S Breslau; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.136

6.  A prospective assessment of racial/ethnic differences in future mammography behavior among women who had early mammography.

Authors:  Julie M Kapp; Rod Walker; Sebastien Haneuse; Bonnie C Yankaskas
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Connie Y Nakano; Thomas D Koepsell; Laurel M Desnick; Carl J D'Orsi; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-09-17       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Reasons women at elevated risk of breast cancer refuse breast MR imaging screening: ACRIN 6666.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Jeffrey D Blume; Amanda M Adams; Roberta A Jong; Richard G Barr; Daniel E Lehrer; Etta D Pisano; W Phil Evans; Mary C Mahoney; Linda Hovanessian Larsen; Glenna J Gabrielli; Ellen B Mendelson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Toward optimal screening strategies for older women. Costs, benefits, and harms of breast cancer screening by age, biology, and health status.

Authors:  Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Clyde B Schechter; K Robin Yabroff; William Lawrence; James Dignam; Martine Extermann; Sarah Fox; Gretchen Orosz; Rebecca Silliman; Jennifer Cullen; Lodovico Balducci
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Symptom distress associated with biopsy in women with suspect breast lesions.

Authors:  Jayesh Kamath; Dean G Cruess; Kevin Claffey; Lori Wilson; Natalie Phoenix; Susan Tannenbaum
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2012-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.