Literature DB >> 18612136

Discriminatory accuracy from single-nucleotide polymorphisms in models to predict breast cancer risk.

Mitchell H Gail1.   

Abstract

One purpose for seeking common alleles that are associated with disease is to use them to improve models for projecting individualized disease risk. Two genome-wide association studies and a study of candidate genes recently identified seven common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that were associated with breast cancer risk in independent samples. These seven SNPs were located in FGFR2, TNRC9 (now known as TOX3), MAP3K1, LSP1, CASP8, chromosomal region 8q, and chromosomal region 2q35. I used estimates of relative risks and allele frequencies from these studies to estimate how much these SNPs could improve discriminatory accuracy measured as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). A model with these seven SNPs (AUC = 0.574) and a hypothetical model with 14 such SNPs (AUC = 0.604) have less discriminatory accuracy than a model, the National Cancer Institute's Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (BCRAT), that is based on ages at menarche and at first live birth, family history of breast cancer, and history of breast biopsy examinations (AUC = 0.607). Adding the seven SNPs to BCRAT improved discriminatory accuracy to an AUC of 0.632, which was, however, less than the improvement from adding mammographic density. Thus, these seven common alleles provide less discriminatory accuracy than BCRAT but have the potential to improve the discriminatory accuracy of BCRAT modestly. Experience to date and quantitative arguments indicate that a huge increase in the numbers of case patients with breast cancer and control subjects would be required in genome-wide association studies to find enough SNPs to achieve high discriminatory accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18612136      PMCID: PMC2528005          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djn180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  19 in total

1.  Polygenic susceptibility to breast cancer and implications for prevention.

Authors:  Paul D P Pharoah; Antonis Antoniou; Martin Bobrow; Ron L Zimmern; Douglas F Easton; Bruce A J Ponder
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-03-04       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Polygenic inheritance of breast cancer: Implications for design of association studies.

Authors:  Antonis C Antoniou; Douglas F Easton
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 3.  Limitations of the odds ratio in gauging the performance of a diagnostic, prognostic, or screening marker.

Authors:  Margaret Sullivan Pepe; Holly Janes; Gary Longton; Wendy Leisenring; Polly Newcomb
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Evidence for further breast cancer susceptibility genes in addition to BRCA1 and BRCA2 in a population-based study.

Authors:  A C Antoniou; P D Pharoah; G McMullan; N E Day; B A Ponder; D Easton
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.135

5.  Common variants on chromosomes 2q35 and 16q12 confer susceptibility to estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Simon N Stacey; Andrei Manolescu; Patrick Sulem; Thorunn Rafnar; Julius Gudmundsson; Sigurjon A Gudjonsson; Gisli Masson; Margret Jakobsdottir; Steinunn Thorlacius; Agnar Helgason; Katja K Aben; Luc J Strobbe; Marjo T Albers-Akkers; Dorine W Swinkels; Brian E Henderson; Laurence N Kolonel; Loic Le Marchand; Esther Millastre; Raquel Andres; Javier Godino; Maria Dolores Garcia-Prats; Eduardo Polo; Alejandro Tres; Magali Mouy; Jona Saemundsdottir; Valgerdur M Backman; Larus Gudmundsson; Kristleifur Kristjansson; Jon T Bergthorsson; Jelena Kostic; Michael L Frigge; Frank Geller; Daniel Gudbjartsson; Helgi Sigurdsson; Thora Jonsdottir; Jon Hrafnkelsson; Jakob Johannsson; Thorarinn Sveinsson; Gardar Myrdal; Hlynur Niels Grimsson; Thorvaldur Jonsson; Susanna von Holst; Barbro Werelius; Sara Margolin; Annika Lindblom; Jose I Mayordomo; Christopher A Haiman; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Oskar Th Johannsson; Jeffrey R Gulcher; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Augustine Kong; Kari Stefansson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-05-27       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Validation of the Gail et al. model of breast cancer risk prediction and implications for chemoprevention.

Authors:  B Rockhill; D Spiegelman; C Byrne; D J Hunter; G A Colditz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-03-07       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Estimates of the number of US women who could benefit from tamoxifen for breast cancer chemoprevention.

Authors:  Andrew N Freedman; Barry I Graubard; Sowmya R Rao; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Mitchell H Gail
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-04-02       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies.

Authors:  A Antoniou; P D P Pharoah; S Narod; H A Risch; J E Eyfjord; J L Hopper; N Loman; H Olsson; O Johannsson; A Borg; B Pasini; P Radice; S Manoukian; D M Eccles; N Tang; E Olah; H Anton-Culver; E Warner; J Lubinski; J Gronwald; B Gorski; H Tulinius; S Thorlacius; H Eerola; H Nevanlinna; K Syrjäkoski; O-P Kallioniemi; D Thompson; C Evans; J Peto; F Lalloo; D G Evans; D F Easton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 9.  Weighing the risks and benefits of tamoxifen treatment for preventing breast cancer.

Authors:  M H Gail; J P Costantino; J Bryant; R Croyle; L Freedman; K Helzlsouer; V Vogel
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1999-11-03       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually.

Authors:  M H Gail; L A Brinton; D P Byar; D K Corle; S B Green; C Schairer; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  126 in total

1.  Testing gene-environment interaction in large-scale case-control association studies: possible choices and comparisons.

Authors:  Bhramar Mukherjee; Jaeil Ahn; Stephen B Gruber; Nilanjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Analytical and simulation methods for estimating the potential predictive ability of genetic profiling: a comparison of methods and results.

Authors:  Suman Kundu; Lennart C Karssen; A Cecile J W Janssens
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Inclusion of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions unlikely to dramatically improve risk prediction for complex diseases.

Authors:  Hugues Aschard; Jinbo Chen; Marilyn C Cornelis; Lori B Chibnik; Elizabeth W Karlson; Peter Kraft
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Performance of common genetic variants in breast-cancer risk models.

Authors:  Sholom Wacholder; Patricia Hartge; Ross Prentice; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Heather Spencer Feigelson; W Ryan Diver; Michael J Thun; David G Cox; Susan E Hankinson; Peter Kraft; Bernard Rosner; Christine D Berg; Louise A Brinton; Jolanta Lissowska; Mark E Sherman; Rowan Chlebowski; Charles Kooperberg; Rebecca D Jackson; Dennis W Buckman; Peter Hui; Ruth Pfeiffer; Kevin B Jacobs; Gilles D Thomas; Robert N Hoover; Mitchell H Gail; Stephen J Chanock; David J Hunter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Lisa J Martin; Michael Bronskill; Martin J Yaffe; Neb Duric; Salomon Minkin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Genome-wide association study (GWAS)-identified disease risk alleles do not compromise human longevity.

Authors:  Marian Beekman; Christa Nederstigt; H Eka D Suchiman; Dennis Kremer; Ruud van der Breggen; Nico Lakenberg; Wendimagegn Ghidey Alemayehu; Anton J M de Craen; Rudi G J Westendorp; Dorret I Boomsma; Eco J C de Geus; Jeanine J Houwing-Duistermaat; Bastiaan T Heijmans; P Eline Slagboom
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Evaluation of a breast cancer risk prediction model expanded to include category of prior benign breast disease lesion.

Authors:  Rulla M Tamimi; Bernard Rosner; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  A compendium of genome-wide associations for cancer: critical synopsis and reappraisal.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Peter Castaldi; Evangelos Evangelou
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Using haplotype analysis to elucidate significant associations between genes and Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Anthony M D'Amelio; Claudia Monroy; Randa El-Zein; Carol J Etzel
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 3.156

10.  Risk Prediction for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in 11 United States-Based Case-Control Studies: Incorporation of Epidemiologic Risk Factors and 17 Confirmed Genetic Loci.

Authors:  Merlise A Clyde; Rachel Palmieri Weber; Edwin S Iversen; Elizabeth M Poole; Jennifer A Doherty; Marc T Goodman; Roberta B Ness; Harvey A Risch; Mary Anne Rossing; Kathryn L Terry; Nicolas Wentzensen; Alice S Whittemore; Hoda Anton-Culver; Elisa V Bandera; Andrew Berchuck; Michael E Carney; Daniel W Cramer; Julie M Cunningham; Kara L Cushing-Haugen; Robert P Edwards; Brooke L Fridley; Ellen L Goode; Galina Lurie; Valerie McGuire; Francesmary Modugno; Kirsten B Moysich; Sara H Olson; Celeste Leigh Pearce; Malcolm C Pike; Joseph H Rothstein; Thomas A Sellers; Weiva Sieh; Daniel Stram; Pamela J Thompson; Robert A Vierkant; Kristine G Wicklund; Anna H Wu; Argyrios Ziogas; Shelley S Tworoger; Joellen M Schildkraut
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 4.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.