| Literature DB >> 27698005 |
Merlise A Clyde, Rachel Palmieri Weber, Edwin S Iversen, Elizabeth M Poole, Jennifer A Doherty, Marc T Goodman, Roberta B Ness, Harvey A Risch, Mary Anne Rossing, Kathryn L Terry, Nicolas Wentzensen, Alice S Whittemore, Hoda Anton-Culver, Elisa V Bandera, Andrew Berchuck, Michael E Carney, Daniel W Cramer, Julie M Cunningham, Kara L Cushing-Haugen, Robert P Edwards, Brooke L Fridley, Ellen L Goode, Galina Lurie, Valerie McGuire, Francesmary Modugno, Kirsten B Moysich, Sara H Olson, Celeste Leigh Pearce, Malcolm C Pike, Joseph H Rothstein, Thomas A Sellers, Weiva Sieh, Daniel Stram, Pamela J Thompson, Robert A Vierkant, Kristine G Wicklund, Anna H Wu, Argyrios Ziogas, Shelley S Tworoger, Joellen M Schildkraut.
Abstract
Previously developed models for predicting absolute risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer have included a limited number of risk factors and have had low discriminatory power (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) < 0.60). Because of this, we developed and internally validated a relative risk prediction model that incorporates 17 established epidemiologic risk factors and 17 genome-wide significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using data from 11 case-control studies in the United States (5,793 cases; 9,512 controls) from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (data accrued from 1992 to 2010). We developed a hierarchical logistic regression model for predicting case-control status that included imputation of missing data. We randomly divided the data into an 80% training sample and used the remaining 20% for model evaluation. The AUC for the full model was 0.664. A reduced model without SNPs performed similarly (AUC = 0.649). Both models performed better than a baseline model that included age and study site only (AUC = 0.563). The best predictive power was obtained in the full model among women younger than 50 years of age (AUC = 0.714); however, the addition of SNPs increased the AUC the most for women older than 50 years of age (AUC = 0.638 vs. 0.616). Adapting this improved model to estimate absolute risk and evaluating it in prospective data sets is warranted.Entities:
Keywords: genetic risk polymorphisms; model evaluation; ovarian cancer; risk model
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27698005 PMCID: PMC5065620 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kww091
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Epidemiol ISSN: 0002-9262 Impact factor: 4.897