Literature DB >> 11984562

Polygenic susceptibility to breast cancer and implications for prevention.

Paul D P Pharoah1, Antonis Antoniou, Martin Bobrow, Ron L Zimmern, Douglas F Easton, Bruce A J Ponder.   

Abstract

The knowledge of human genetic variation that will come from the human genome sequence makes feasible a polygenic approach to disease prevention, in which it will be possible to identify individuals as susceptible by their genotype profile and to prevent disease by targeting interventions to those at risk. There is doubt, however, regarding the magnitude of these genetic effects and thus the potential to apply them to either individuals or populations. We have therefore examined the potential for prediction of risk based on common genetic variation using data from a population-based series of individuals with breast cancer. The data are compatible with a log-normal distribution of genetic risk in the population that is sufficiently wide to provide useful discrimination of high- and low-risk groups. Assuming all of the susceptibility genes could be identified, the half of the population at highest risk would account for 88% of all affected individuals. By contrast, if currently identified risk factors for breast cancer were used to stratify the population, the half of the population at highest risk would account for only 62% of all cases. These results suggest that the construction and use of genetic-risk profiles may provide significant improvements in the efficacy of population-based programs of intervention for cancers and other diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11984562     DOI: 10.1038/ng853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Genet        ISSN: 1061-4036            Impact factor:   38.330


  262 in total

1.  The future of association studies of common cancers.

Authors:  Richard S Houlston; Julian Peto
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2003-02-06       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  The prediction of disease risk in genomic medicine.

Authors:  Wayne D Hall; Katherine I Morley; Jayne C Lucke
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Mammographic breast density and breast cancer: evidence of a shared genetic basis.

Authors:  Jajini S Varghese; Deborah J Thompson; Kyriaki Michailidou; Sara Lindström; Clare Turnbull; Judith Brown; Jean Leyland; Ruth M L Warren; Robert N Luben; Ruth J Loos; Nicholas J Wareham; Johanna Rommens; Andrew D Paterson; Lisa J Martin; Celine M Vachon; Christopher G Scott; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Fergus J Couch; Carmel Apicella; Melissa C Southey; Jennifer Stone; Jingmei Li; Louise Eriksson; Kamila Czene; Norman F Boyd; Per Hall; John L Hopper; Rulla M Tamimi; Nazneen Rahman; Douglas F Easton
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Distribution of allele frequencies and effect sizes and their interrelationships for common genetic susceptibility variants.

Authors:  Ju-Hyun Park; Mitchell H Gail; Clarice R Weinberg; Raymond J Carroll; Charles C Chung; Zhaoming Wang; Stephen J Chanock; Joseph F Fraumeni; Nilanjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Analytical and simulation methods for estimating the potential predictive ability of genetic profiling: a comparison of methods and results.

Authors:  Suman Kundu; Lennart C Karssen; A Cecile J W Janssens
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  A genome wide linkage scan for dizygotic twinning in 525 families of mothers of dizygotic twins.

Authors:  Jodie N Painter; Gonneke Willemsen; Dale Nyholt; Chantal Hoekstra; David L Duffy; Anjali K Henders; Leanne Wallace; Sue Healey; Lisa A Cannon-Albright; Mark Skolnick; Nicholas G Martin; Dorret I Boomsma; Grant W Montgomery
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Discriminative accuracy of genomic profiling comparing multiplicative and additive risk models.

Authors:  Ramal Moonesinghe; Muin J Khoury; Tiebin Liu; A Cecile J W Janssens
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  A KRAS-variant in ovarian cancer acts as a genetic marker of cancer risk.

Authors:  Elena Ratner; Lingeng Lu; Marta Boeke; Rachel Barnett; Sunitha Nallur; Lena J Chin; Cory Pelletier; Rachel Blitzblau; Renata Tassi; Trupti Paranjape; Pei Hui; Andrew K Godwin; Herbert Yu; Harvey Risch; Thomas Rutherford; Peter Schwartz; Alessandro Santin; Ellen Matloff; Daniel Zelterman; Frank J Slack; Joanne B Weidhaas
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Second malignant neoplasms in patients with Cowden syndrome with underlying germline PTEN mutations.

Authors:  Joanne Ngeow; Kim Stanuch; Jessica L Mester; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Charis Eng
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Tumor characteristics as an analytic tool for classifying genetic variants of uncertain clinical significance.

Authors:  Robert M W Hofstra; Amanda B Spurdle; Diana Eccles; William D Foulkes; Niels de Wind; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Frans B L Hogervorst
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.878

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.