Literature DB >> 18611839

Candidate neural locus for sex differences in reproductive decisions.

Kim L Hoke1, Michael J Ryan, Walter Wilczynski.   

Abstract

Sexual selection and signal detection theories predict that females should be selective in their responses to mating signals in mate choice, while the response of males to signals in male competition should be less selective. The neural processes underlying this behavioural sex difference remain obscure. Differences in behavioural selectivity could result from differences in how sensitive sensory systems are to mating signals, distinct thresholds in motor areas regulating behaviour, or sex differences in selectivity at a gateway relaying sensory information to motor systems. We tested these hypotheses in frogs using the expression of egr-1 to quantify the neural responses of each sex to mating signals. We found that egr-1 expression in a midbrain auditory region was elevated in males in response to both conspecific and heterospecific calls, whereas in females, egr-1 induction occurred only in response to conspecific signals. This differential neural selectivity mirrored the sex differences in behavioural responsiveness to these stimuli. By contrast, egr-1 expression in lower brainstem auditory centres was not different in males and females. Our results support a model in which sex differences in behavioural selectivity arise from sex differences in the neural selectivity in midbrain areas relaying sensory information to the forebrain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18611839      PMCID: PMC2610069          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  12 in total

Review 1.  The genomic action potential.

Authors:  D F Clayton
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.877

2.  Influence of descending forebrain projections on processing of acoustic signals and audiomotor integration in the anuran midbrain.

Authors:  H Endepols; W Walkowiak
Journal:  Eur J Morphol       Date:  1999-04

3.  Functional mapping of the auditory midbrain during mate call reception.

Authors:  Kim L Hoke; Sabrina S Burmeister; Russell D Fernald; A Stanley Rand; Michael J Ryan; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Social cues shift functional connectivity in the hypothalamus.

Authors:  Kim L Hoke; Michael J Ryan; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Integration of sensory and motor processing underlying social behaviour in túngara frogs.

Authors:  Kim L Hoke; Michael J Ryan; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Female mate choice in a neotropical frog.

Authors:  M J Ryan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-07-25       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Evoked vocal response in male túngara frogs: pre-existing biases in male responses?

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Reproductive hormones modify reception of species-typical communication signals in a female anuran.

Authors:  Kathleen S Lynch; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 1.808

9.  Auditory and vocal nuclei in the frog brain concentrate sex hormones.

Authors:  D B Kelley
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-02-01       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Female responses to ancestral advertisement calls in tungara frogs.

Authors:  M J Ryan; A S Rand
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  15 in total

1.  Sexually dimorphic sensory gating drives behavioral differences in tungara frogs.

Authors:  Kim L Hoke; Michael J Ryan; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 2.  The behavioral neuroscience of anuran social signal processing.

Authors:  Walter Wilczynski; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Sex-specific visual performance: female lizards outperform males in motion detection.

Authors:  Saúl S Nava; Mirela Conway; Emília P Martins
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Sex-dependent species discrimination in auditory forebrain of naturally hybridizing birds.

Authors:  Jennifer M Gee; Michelle L Tomaszycki; Elizabeth Adkins-Regan
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 1.808

Review 5.  Categorization = decision making + generalization.

Authors:  Carol A Seger; Erik J Peterson
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Task differences confound sex differences in receiver permissiveness in túngara frogs.

Authors:  Ximena E Bernal; A Stanley Rand; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Neural activity patterns in response to interspecific and intraspecific variation in mating calls in the túngara frog.

Authors:  Mukta Chakraborty; Lisa A Mangiamele; Sabrina S Burmeister
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Sex differences and androgen influences on midbrain auditory thresholds in the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea.

Authors:  Jason A Miranda; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Auditory sensitivity exhibits sexual dimorphism and seasonal plasticity in music frogs.

Authors:  Ping Yang; Fei Xue; Jianguo Cui; Steven E Brauth; Yezhong Tang; Guangzhan Fang
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 10.  Development of communication behaviour: receiver ontogeny in Túngara frogs and a prospectus for a behavioural evolutionary development.

Authors:  Alexander T Baugh; Kim L Hoke; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-05-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.