Literature DB >> 9933549

Evoked vocal response in male túngara frogs: pre-existing biases in male responses?

.   

Abstract

Female túngara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus, are preferentially attracted to a whine-chuck advertisement call over a simple whine (Rand & Ryan 1981, Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 57, 209-214). Females also show phonotactic preferences for the whine when a number of other heterospecific or artificial stimuli are added to it, and these calls tend to be as attractive to females as a whine-chuck (Ryan & Rand 1990, Evolution, 44, 305-314). We tested male túngara frogs with the same suite of stimuli using evoked vocal responses as a bioassay to examine sexual differences in responses to signal variation. A whine-chuck elicited greater responses from males than a whine-only. Artificial and heterospecific stimuli that enhanced call attractiveness to females also elicited greater vocal responses from males and, as with females, the effects of these stimuli were similar to that of the whine-chuck. Thus, in both sexes there are pre-existing biases for a suite of stimuli not produced by conspecifics. (c) 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 9933549     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0928

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  10 in total

1.  Evolutionarily labile responses to a signal of aggressive intent.

Authors:  Jason A Moretz; Molly R Morris
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Candidate neural locus for sex differences in reproductive decisions.

Authors:  Kim L Hoke; Michael J Ryan; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Male receiver bias for red agonistic signalling in a yellow-signalling widowbird: a field experiment.

Authors:  C E Ninnes; S Andersson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Signals and behavioural responses are not coupled in males: aggression affected by replacement of an evolutionarily lost colour signal.

Authors:  V S Quinn; D K Hews
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Tuned in to communication sounds: Neuronal sensitivity in the túngara frog midbrain to frequency modulated signals.

Authors:  Abhilash Ponnath; Michael J Ryan; Zhide Fang; Hamilton E Farris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Significance of temporal and spectral acoustic cues for sexual recognition in Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Clémentine Vignal; Darcy Kelley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Task differences confound sex differences in receiver permissiveness in túngara frogs.

Authors:  Ximena E Bernal; A Stanley Rand; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Call recognition in the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana: generalization along the duration continuum.

Authors:  Andrea Megela Simmons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Reproductive hormones modify reception of species-typical communication signals in a female anuran.

Authors:  Kathleen S Lynch; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 1.808

10.  Energy substrate utilization during nightly vocal activity in three species of Scinax (Anura/Hylidae).

Authors:  José Eduardo Carvalho; Fernando Ribeiro Gomes; Carlos Arturo Navas
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 2.200

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.