Literature DB >> 15601932

Functional mapping of the auditory midbrain during mate call reception.

Kim L Hoke1, Sabrina S Burmeister, Russell D Fernald, A Stanley Rand, Michael J Ryan, Walter Wilczynski.   

Abstract

We examined patterns of neural activity as assayed by changes in gene expression to localize representation of acoustic mating signals in the auditory midbrain of frogs. We exposed wild-caught male Physalaemus pustulosus to conspecific mating calls that vary in their behavioral salience, nonsalient mating calls, or no sound. We measured expression of the immediate early gene egr-1 (also called ZENK, zif268, NGFI-A, and krox-24) throughout the torus semicircularis, the auditory midbrain homolog of the inferior colliculus. Differential egr-1 induction in response to the acoustic stimuli occurred in the laminar, midline, and principal nuclei of the torus semicircularis, whereas the ventral region did not show significant effects of stimulus. The laminar nucleus differentially responded to conspecific mating calls compared with nonsalient mating calls, whereas the midline and principal nuclei responded preferentially to one of two conspecific calls. These responses were not explained by simple acoustic properties of the stimuli, and they demonstrate a functional heterogeneity of auditory processing of complex biological signals within the frog midbrain. Moreover, using analyses that assess the ability of the torus semicircularis as a whole to discriminate among acoustic stimuli, we found that activity patterns in the four regions together provide more information about biologically relevant acoustic stimuli than activity in any single region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15601932      PMCID: PMC6730357          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2079-04.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  29 in total

1.  Sexually dimorphic sensory gating drives behavioral differences in tungara frogs.

Authors:  Kim L Hoke; Michael J Ryan; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 2.  The behavioral neuroscience of anuran social signal processing.

Authors:  Walter Wilczynski; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Social cues shift functional connectivity in the hypothalamus.

Authors:  Kim L Hoke; Michael J Ryan; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Integration of sensory and motor processing underlying social behaviour in túngara frogs.

Authors:  Kim L Hoke; Michael J Ryan; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Candidate neural locus for sex differences in reproductive decisions.

Authors:  Kim L Hoke; Michael J Ryan; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Representation of particle motion in the auditory midbrain of a developing anuran.

Authors:  Andrea Megela Simmons
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Do frog-eating bats perceptually bind the complex components of frog calls?

Authors:  Patricia L Jones; Hamilton E Farris; Michael J Ryan; Rachel A Page
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 8.  Oxytocin and vasopressin neural networks: Implications for social behavioral diversity and translational neuroscience.

Authors:  Zachary V Johnson; Larry J Young
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  Sex differences and endocrine regulation of auditory-evoked, neural responses in African clawed frogs (Xenopus).

Authors:  Ian C Hall; Sarah M N Woolley; Ursula Kwong-Brown; Darcy B Kelley
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Neural activity patterns in response to interspecific and intraspecific variation in mating calls in the túngara frog.

Authors:  Mukta Chakraborty; Lisa A Mangiamele; Sabrina S Burmeister
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.