Literature DB >> 20889827

Sexually dimorphic sensory gating drives behavioral differences in tungara frogs.

Kim L Hoke1, Michael J Ryan, Walter Wilczynski.   

Abstract

Males and females can differ both in the social behaviors they perform and in the contexts in which they engage in these behaviors. One possible mechanism of sex differences in behavior is a sexual dimorphism in the relay of sensory information to motor areas, but no studies have examined the role of such a relay in vertebrate sexually dimorphic behaviors. We used egr-1 expression as a marker of neural activation in frogs exposed to conspecific and heterospecific acoustic signals to compare activation patterns throughout the brains of males and females. We determined how the sexes differ in the transformation of social signals into motor responses in the context of social communication. We examined the relationships between egr-1 mRNA levels in the auditory midbrain and forebrain areas, as well as how forebrain expression related to the behavioral responses of the animals. Forebrain network activation patterns and forebrain-behavior relationships were similar in males and females. By contrast, we found a sex difference in the relationship between midbrain and forebrain activation; midbrain auditory responses predicted forebrain responses in females but not in males. This sex difference suggests that sensory inputs differentially regulate motor systems underlying social behaviors in males and females. This sensorimotor transformation may be a common locus for generating sex differences in behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20889827      PMCID: PMC2948475          DOI: 10.1242/jeb.043992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  19 in total

Review 1.  The genomic action potential.

Authors:  D F Clayton
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.877

2.  Functional mapping of the auditory midbrain during mate call reception.

Authors:  Kim L Hoke; Sabrina S Burmeister; Russell D Fernald; A Stanley Rand; Michael J Ryan; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Social cues shift functional connectivity in the hypothalamus.

Authors:  Kim L Hoke; Michael J Ryan; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Integration of sensory and motor processing underlying social behaviour in túngara frogs.

Authors:  Kim L Hoke; Michael J Ryan; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  ZENK protein regulation by song in the brain of songbirds.

Authors:  C V Mello; S Ribeiro
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1998-04-20       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 6.  Lordosis as a sexually dimorphic neural function.

Authors:  R E Harlan; B D Shivers; D W Pfaff
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.453

7.  The development of sexual behavior in túngara frogs (Physalaemus pustulosus).

Authors:  Alexander T Baugh; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.231

Review 8.  A gene for neuronal plasticity in the mammalian brain: Zif268/Egr-1/NGFI-A/Krox-24/TIS8/ZENK?

Authors:  Ewelina Knapska; Leszek Kaczmarek
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 11.685

9.  Functional aspects of ultrasound production by infant albino rats (Rattus norvegicus).

Authors:  J T Allin; E M Banks
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1972-02       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Roles of the auditory midbrain and thalamus in selective phonotaxis in female gray treefrogs (Hyla versicolor).

Authors:  Heike Endepols; Albert S Feng; H Carl Gerhardt; Johannes Schul; Wolfgang Walkowiak
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-17       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  The behavioral neuroscience of anuran social signal processing.

Authors:  Walter Wilczynski; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Vocal-motor and auditory connectivity of the midbrain periaqueductal gray in a teleost fish.

Authors:  J Matthew Kittelberger; Andrew H Bass
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  Brain Activation Patterns in Response to Conspecific and Heterospecific Social Acoustic Signals in Female Plainfin Midshipman Fish, Porichthys notatus.

Authors:  Robert A Mohr; Yiran Chang; Ashwin A Bhandiwad; Paul M Forlano; Joseph A Sisneros
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 1.808

4.  Auditory sensitivity exhibits sexual dimorphism and seasonal plasticity in music frogs.

Authors:  Ping Yang; Fei Xue; Jianguo Cui; Steven E Brauth; Yezhong Tang; Guangzhan Fang
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  From behavioral context to receptors: serotonergic modulatory pathways in the IC.

Authors:  Laura M Hurley; Megan R Sullivan
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 3.492

6.  Decoupled Evolution between Senders and Receivers in the Neotropical Allobates femoralis Frog Complex.

Authors:  Mileidy Betancourth-Cundar; Albertina P Lima; Walter Hӧdl; Adolfo Amézquita
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Auditory perception exhibits sexual dimorphism and left telencephalic dominance in Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Yanzhu Fan; Xizi Yue; Fei Xue; Jianguo Cui; Steven E Brauth; Yezhong Tang; Guangzhan Fang
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.422

8.  Preference of spectral features in auditory processing for advertisement calls in the music frogs.

Authors:  Yanzhu Fan; Xizi Yue; Jing Yang; Jiangyan Shen; Di Shen; Yezhong Tang; Guangzhan Fang
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 3.172

9.  Birdsong: is it music to their ears?

Authors:  Sarah E Earp; Donna L Maney
Journal:  Front Evol Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-28

10.  Evaluation and hedonic value in mate choice.

Authors:  Gil G Rosenthal
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 2.624

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.