Literature DB >> 19656865

Sex-specific visual performance: female lizards outperform males in motion detection.

Saúl S Nava1, Mirela Conway, Emília P Martins.   

Abstract

In animal communication, complex displays usually have multiple functions and, male and female receivers often differ in their utilization and response to different aspects of these displays. The perceptual variability hypothesis suggests that different aspects of complex signals differ in their ability to be detected and processed by different receivers. Here, we tested whether receiver male and female Sceloporus graciosus lizards differ in visual motion detection by measuring the latency to the visual grasp response to a motion stimulus. We demonstrate that in lizards that largely exhibit complex motions as courtship signals, female lizards are faster than males at visually detecting motion. These results highlight that differential signal utilization by the sexes may be driven by variability in the capacity to detect different display properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19656865      PMCID: PMC2827977          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  10 in total

1.  Sexual dimorphism matches photoreceptor performance to behavioural requirements.

Authors:  E P Hornstein; D C O'Carroll; J C Anderson; S B Laughlin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Steroid-dependent auditory plasticity leads to adaptive coupling of sender and receiver.

Authors:  Joseph A Sisneros; Paul M Forlano; David L Deitcher; Andrew H Bass
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  A comparative study of the evolution of sceloporus push-up displays.

Authors:  E P Martins
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Candidate neural locus for sex differences in reproductive decisions.

Authors:  Kim L Hoke; Michael J Ryan; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Sex-specific responses to vocal convergence and divergence of contact calls in orange-fronted conures (Aratinga canicularis).

Authors:  Thorsten J S Balsby; Judith C Scarl
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Effects of oestrogen replacement therapy on pattern reversal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  H Yilmaz; E Erkin; H Mavioglu; S Laçin
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.089

7.  Task differences confound sex differences in receiver permissiveness in túngara frogs.

Authors:  Ximena E Bernal; A Stanley Rand; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Hormonal modulation of phonotaxis and advertisement-call preferences in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor).

Authors:  Noah M Gordon; H Carl Gerhardt
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 3.587

9.  Multiple receivers, multiple ornaments, and a trade-off between agonistic and epigamic signaling in a widowbird.

Authors:  Staffan Andersson; Sarah R Pryke; Jonas Ornborg; Michael J Lawes; Malte Andersson
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Visual sensitivity to a conspicuous male cue varies by reproductive state in Physalaemus pustulosus females.

Authors:  Molly E Cummings; Ximena E Bernal; Roberto Reynaga; A Stanley Rand; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.312

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Do male and female cowbirds see their world differently? Implications for sex differences in the sensory system of an avian brood parasite.

Authors:  Esteban Fernández-Juricic; Agustin Ojeda; Marcella Deisher; Brianna Burry; Patrice Baumhardt; Amy Stark; Amanda G Elmore; Amanda L Ensminger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Inter-individual differences in foveal shape in a scavenging raptor, the black kite Milvus migrans.

Authors:  Simon Potier; Mindaugas Mitkus; Thomas J Lisney; Pierre-François Isard; Thomas Dulaurent; Marielle Mentek; Raphaël Cornette; David Schikorski; Almut Kelber
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.