Literature DB >> 23435930

Gadobutrol: a review of its use for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in adults and children.

Lesley J Scott1.   

Abstract

Since the introduction of the first gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) approximately 25 years ago, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using GBCAs has revolutionized diagnostic and follow-up imaging of pathological lesions, with clinical applications expanded to encompass almost all fields of medicine. Intravenous gadobutrol (Gadovist™ [EU]; Gadavist(®) [USA]) is a second-generation extracellular non-ionic macrocyclic GBCA that is used in patients undergoing diagnostic contrast-enhanced MRI for visualization of pathological lesions in the CNS and all other body regions or for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) to evaluate perfusion and flow-related abnormalities. Its unique physicochemical profile, along with the high thermostability of macrocyclic GBCAs, means gadobutrol is formulated at twice the gadolinium ion concentration of other currently licensed GBCAs. This reduces the injection volume and provides a narrower bolus, thereby improving image enhancement. Based on extensive clinical experience in a broad range of patients, including paediatric and adult patients (younger and elderly adults), and those with moderate to severe hepatic or renal impairment or cardiovascular disorders, gadobutrol is an effective and generally well tolerated extracellular GBCA for patients undergoing diagnostic contrast-enhanced MRI and contrast-enhanced MRA. As with all macrocyclic GBCAs, the potential for gadobutrol to cause nephrogenic systemic fibrosis appears to be lower than with linear GBCAs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23435930     DOI: 10.1007/s40261-013-0066-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  36 in total

1.  Cerebral MR perfusion imaging: first clinical application of a 1 M gadolinium chelate (Gadovist 1.0) in a double-blinded randomized dose-finding study.

Authors:  T Benner; P Reimer; G Erb; G Schuierer; S Heiland; C Fischer; V Geens; K Sartor; M Forsting
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Cerebral neoplastic enhancing lesions: multicenter, randomized, crossover intraindividual comparison between gadobutrol (1.0M) and gadoterate meglumine (0.5M) at 0.1 mmol Gd/kg body weight in a clinical setting.

Authors:  Nicoletta Anzalone; Tommaso Scarabino; Carlo Venturi; Concetto Cristaudo; Armando Tartaro; Giuseppe Scotti; Domenico Zimatore; Roberto Floris; Alessandro Carriero; Marcello Longo; Mario Cirillo; Maria Assunta Cova; Simona Gatti; Matthias Voth; Cesare Colosimo
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-03       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Safety of gadobutrol, a new generation of contrast agents: experience from clinical trials and postmarketing surveillance.

Authors:  Matthias Voth; Martin Rosenberg; Josy Breuer
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 4.  Value of 1.0- M gadolinium chelates: review of preclinical and clinical data on gadobutrol.

Authors:  Bernd Tombach; Walter Heindel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-02-21       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Pharmacokinetics, dose proportionality, and tolerability of gadobutrol after single intravenous injection in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  T Staks; G Schuhmann-Giampieri; T Frenzel; H J Weinmann; L Lange; J Platzek
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Dynamic and static magnetic resonance angiography of the supra-aortic vessels at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparison of gadobutrol, gadobenate dimeglumine, and gadoterate meglumine at equimolar dose.

Authors:  Jens Harald Kramer; Elisabeth Arnoldi; Christopher J François; Andrew L Wentland; Konstantin Nikolaou; Bernd J Wintersperger; Thomas M Grist
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Frequency and severity of acute allergic-like reactions to gadolinium-containing i.v. contrast media in children and adults.

Authors:  Jonathan R Dillman; James H Ellis; Richard H Cohan; Peter J Strouse; Sophia C Jan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Preclinical investigation to compare different gadolinium-based contrast agents regarding their propensity to release gadolinium in vivo and to trigger nephrogenic systemic fibrosis-like lesions.

Authors:  Martin A Sieber; Philipp Lengsfeld; Thomas Frenzel; Sven Golfier; Heribert Schmitt-Willich; Fred Siegmund; Jakob Walter; Hanns-Joachim Weinmann; Hubertus Pietsch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Gadobutrol-enhanced moving-table magnetic resonance angiography in patients with peripheral vascular disease: a prospective, multi-centre blinded comparison with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Annette Hentsch; Manuela A Aschauer; Jörn O Balzer; Joachim Brossmann; Hans P Busch; Kirsten Davis; Philippe Douek; Franz Ebner; Jos M A van Engelshoven; Michaela Gregor; Christian Kersting; Patrick R Knüsel; Edward Leen; Tim Leiner; Christian Loewe; Simon McPherson; Peter Reimer; Fritz K W Schäfer; Matthias Taupitz; Siegfried A Thurnher; Bernd Tombach; Robin Wegener; Dominik Weishaupt; James F M Meaney
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-03-25       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Two cases of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis after exposure to the macrocyclic compound gadobutrol.

Authors:  Tina Rask Elmholdt; Bettina Jørgensen; Mette Ramsing; Michael Pedersen; Anne Braae Olesen
Journal:  NDT Plus       Date:  2010-03-19
View more
  16 in total

1.  Prospective intraindividual comparison of gadoterate and gadobutrol for cervical and intracranial contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Philip Hoelter; Stefan Lang; Marina Weibart; Manuel Schmidt; Michael F X Knott; Tobias Engelhorn; Marco Essig; Stephan Kloska; Arnd Doerfler
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Comparing the signal enhancement of a gadolinium based and an iron-oxide based contrast agent in low-field MRI.

Authors:  Jordy K van Zandwijk; Frank F J Simonis; Friso G Heslinga; Elfi I S Hofmeijer; Robert H Geelkerken; Bennie Ten Haken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome after the Use of Gadolinium Contrast Media.

Authors:  Jihye Park; Il Hwan Byun; Kyung Hee Park; Jae-Hyun Lee; Eun Ji Nam; Jung-Won Park
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.759

4.  Safety of Gadobutrol: Results From 42 Clinical Phase II to IV Studies and Postmarketing Surveillance After 29 Million Applications.

Authors:  Jan Endrikat; Kai Vogtlaender; Susan Dohanish; Thomas Balzer; Josy Breuer
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Safety of gadobutrol in over 23,000 patients: the GARDIAN study, a global multicentre, prospective, non-interventional study.

Authors:  Martin R Prince; Hae Giu Lee; Chang-Hee Lee; Sung Won Youn; In Ho Lee; Woong Yoon; Benqiang Yang; Haiping Wang; Jin Wang; Tiffany Ting-Fang Shih; Guo-Shu Huang; Jiing-Feng Lirng; Petra Palkowitsch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Accuracy and Repeatability of Automated Injector Versus Manual Administration of an MRI Contrast Agent-Results of a Laboratory Study.

Authors:  Jan Endrikat; Ron Barbati; Marcella Scarpa; Gregor Jost; Arthur E Ned Uber
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 7.  Gadobutrol in India-A Comprehensive Review of Safety and Efficacy.

Authors:  Jan Endrikat; Nicoletta Anzalone
Journal:  Magn Reson Insights       Date:  2017-09-11

Review 8.  25 Years of Contrast-Enhanced MRI: Developments, Current Challenges and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Jessica Lohrke; Thomas Frenzel; Jan Endrikat; Filipe Caseiro Alves; Thomas M Grist; Meng Law; Jeong Min Lee; Tim Leiner; Kun-Cheng Li; Konstantin Nikolaou; Martin R Prince; Hans H Schild; Jeffrey C Weinreb; Kohki Yoshikawa; Hubertus Pietsch
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.845

9.  Gadobutrol in Renally Impaired Patients: Results of the GRIP Study.

Authors:  Henrik J Michaely; Manuela Aschauer; Hannes Deutschmann; Georg Bongartz; Matthias Gutberlet; Ramona Woitek; Birgit Ertl-Wagner; Walter Kucharczyk; Renate Hammerstingl; Francesco De Cobelli; Martin Rosenberg; Thomas Balzer; Jan Endrikat
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 6.016

10.  Safety of gadobutrol in more than 1,000 pediatric patients: subanalysis of the GARDIAN study, a global multicenter prospective non-interventional study.

Authors:  Katja Glutig; Ravi Bhargava; Gabriele Hahn; Wolfgang Hirsch; Christian Kunze; Hans-Joachim Mentzel; Jürgen F Schaefer; Winfried Willinek; Petra Palkowitsch
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-04-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.