Literature DB >> 19396622

Gene expression profiles of MON810 and comparable non-GM maize varieties cultured in the field are more similar than are those of conventional lines.

Anna Coll1, Anna Nadal, Rosa Collado, Gemma Capellades, Joaquima Messeguer, Enric Melé, Montserrat Palaudelmàs, Maria Pla.   

Abstract

Maize is a major food crop and genetically modified (GM) varieties represented 24% of the global production in 2007. Authorized GM organisms have been tested for human and environmental safety. We previously used microarrays to compare the transcriptome profiles of widely used commercial MON810 versus near-isogenic varieties and reported differential expression of a small set of sequences in leaves of in vitro cultured plants of AristisBt/Aristis and PR33P67/PR33P66 (Coll et al. 2008). Here we further assessed the significance of these differential expression patterns in plants grown in a real context, i.e. in the field. Most sequences that were differentially expressed in plants cultured in vitro had the same expression values in MON810 and comparable varieties when grown in the field; and no sequence was found to be differentially regulated in the two variety pairs grown in the field. The differential expression patterns observed between in vitro and field culture were similar between MON810 and comparable varieties, with higher divergence between the two conventional varieties. This further indicates that MON810 and comparable non-GM varieties are equivalent except for the introduced character.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19396622     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-009-9266-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  25 in total

1.  Microarray analyses reveal that plant mutagenesis may induce more transcriptomic changes than transgene insertion.

Authors:  Rita Batista; Nelson Saibo; Tiago Lourenço; Maria Margarida Oliveira
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Effect of transgenes on global gene expression in soybean is within the natural range of variation of conventional cultivars.

Authors:  K C Cheng; J Beaulieu; E Iquira; F J Belzile; M G Fortin; M V Strömvik
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 5.279

3.  A metabonomic study of transgenic maize (Zea mays) seeds revealed variations in osmolytes and branched amino acids.

Authors:  Cesare Manetti; Cristiano Bianchetti; Lorena Casciani; Cecilia Castro; Maria Enrica Di Cocco; Alfredo Miccheli; Mario Motto; Filippo Conti
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 6.992

4.  Metabolic engineering of dhurrin in transgenic Arabidopsis plants with marginal inadvertent effects on the metabolome and transcriptome.

Authors:  Charlotte Kristensen; Marc Morant; Carl Erik Olsen; Claus T Ekstrøm; David W Galbraith; Birger Lindberg Møller; Søren Bak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Major differences observed in transcript profiles of blueberry during cold acclimation under field and cold room conditions.

Authors:  Anik L Dhanaraj; Nadim W Alkharouf; Hunter S Beard; Imed B Chouikha; Benjamin F Matthews; Hui Wei; Rajeev Arora; Lisa J Rowland
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 4.116

6.  Application of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis to interrogate alterations in the proteome of gentically modified crops. 3. Assessing unintended effects.

Authors:  Martin C Ruebelt; Markus Lipp; Tracey L Reynolds; Jon J Schmuke; James D Astwood; Dean DellaPenna; Karl-Heinz Engel; Klaus-Dieter Jany
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 5.279

7.  Analysis of chiral amino acids in conventional and transgenic maize.

Authors:  Miguel Herrero; Elena Ibáñez; Pedro J Martín-Alvarez; Alejandro Cifuentes
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Flavonoid profiling among wild type and related GM wheat varieties.

Authors:  Jean-Robert Ioset; Bartosz Urbaniak; Karine Ndjoko-Ioset; Judith Wirth; Frédéric Martin; Wilhelm Gruissem; Kurt Hostettmann; Christof Sautter
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 4.076

9.  Hierarchical metabolomics demonstrates substantial compositional similarity between genetically modified and conventional potato crops.

Authors:  Gareth S Catchpole; Manfred Beckmann; David P Enot; Madhav Mondhe; Britta Zywicki; Janet Taylor; Nigel Hardy; Aileen Smith; Ross D King; Douglas B Kell; Oliver Fiehn; John Draper
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Assessing the potential for unintended effects in genetically modified potatoes perturbed in metabolic and developmental processes. Targeted analysis of key nutrients and anti-nutrients.

Authors:  Louise V T Shepherd; James W McNicol; Ruth Razzo; Mark A Taylor; Howard V Davies
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.145

View more
  18 in total

1.  Transcriptome and metabolome profiling of field-grown transgenic barley lack induced differences but show cultivar-specific variances.

Authors:  Karl-Heinz Kogel; Lars M Voll; Patrick Schäfer; Carin Jansen; Yongchun Wu; Gregor Langen; Jafargholi Imani; Jörg Hofmann; Alfred Schmiedl; Sophia Sonnewald; Diter von Wettstein; R James Cook; Uwe Sonnewald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Natural variation explains most transcriptomic changes among maize plants of MON810 and comparable non-GM varieties subjected to two N-fertilization farming practices.

Authors:  Anna Coll; Anna Nadal; Rosa Collado; Gemma Capellades; Mikael Kubista; Joaquima Messeguer; Maria Pla
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 3.  Evaluation of genetically engineered crops using transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic profiling techniques.

Authors:  Agnès E Ricroch; Jean B Bergé; Marcel Kuntz
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Molecular characterization and efficacy evaluation of a transgenic corn event for insect resistance and glyphosate tolerance.

Authors:  Miao-Miao Liu; Xiao-Jing Zhang; Yan Gao; Zhi-Cheng Shen; Chao-Yang Lin
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2018 Aug.       Impact factor: 3.066

5.  Transgene x environment interactions in genetically modified wheat.

Authors:  Simon L Zeller; Olena Kalinina; Susanne Brunner; Beat Keller; Bernhard Schmid
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Insect-protected event DAS-81419-2 soybean (Glycine max L.) grown in the United States and Brazil is compositionally equivalent to nontransgenic soybean.

Authors:  Brandon J Fast; Ariane C Schafer; Tempest Y Johnson; Brian L Potts; Rod A Herman
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 5.279

Review 7.  Is the German suspension of MON810 maize cultivation scientifically justified?

Authors:  Agnès Ricroch; Jean Baptiste Bergé; Marcel Kuntz
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 2.788

8.  Proteomic evaluation of genetically modified crops: current status and challenges.

Authors:  Chun Yan Gong; Tai Wang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Do transgenesis and marker-assisted backcross breeding produce substantially equivalent plants? A comparative study of transgenic and backcross rice carrying bacterial blight resistant gene Xa21.

Authors:  Lifen Gao; Yinghao Cao; Zhihui Xia; Guanghuai Jiang; Guozhen Liu; Weixiong Zhang; Wenxue Zhai
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Comparative proteomic analysis of genetically modified maize grown under different agroecosystems conditions in Brazil.

Authors:  Sarah Zanon Agapito-Tenfen; Miguel Pedro Guerra; Odd-Gunnar Wikmark; Rubens Onofre Nodari
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.480

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.