Hans Hoffmann1, Katja Frieler, Bernd Hamm, Marc Dewey. 1. Department of Radiology, Charité, Medical School, Freie Universität and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) is an emerging noninvasive technique for detecting coronary plaques. The present study investigated agreement in the detection and characterization of coronary plaques and reproducibility of volumetric analysis. METHODS: A total of 20 patients underwent MSCT coronary angiography using 64 * 0.5 mm detector collimation. Two readers independently visually evaluated all MSCT datasets for the presence of coronary plaques (n = 82 in 262 coronary segments) and then classified them as calcified, mixed and noncalcified. In addition, one of the readers also manually determined total volumes as well as calcified and noncalcified volumes of each plaque. After a period of at least 4 weeks the complete volumetric analysis was repeated. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement was good for detection of coronary plaques on the segment level (weighted kappa = 0.88, 95% CI [0.76, 0.95]). However, there was only moderate interobserver agreement for plaques classification (unweighted kappa = 0.45, 95% CI [0.35, 0.61]). Intraobserver agreement was good for plaque detection on segment level (weighted kappa = 0.90, 95% CI [0.77, 0.96]), while it was moderate with respect to their characterization (unweighted kappa = 0.65, 95% CI [0.55, 0.80]). There was moderate reproducibility for total plaque volume (limits of agreement = +/-6 mm3 at a mean measured volume of 10 mm3 and = +/-28 mm3 at a mean measured volume of 100 mm3). Variation of relative differences significantly decreased for total volume and noncalcified volume with increasing mean volume. CONCLUSIONS: Detection and volumetry of plaques by means of MSCT shows good to moderate reproducibility. Agreement of volume measurements depends on plaque size. Variation of relative differences decrease with increasing mean plaque volume.
OBJECTIVE: Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) is an emerging noninvasive technique for detecting coronary plaques. The present study investigated agreement in the detection and characterization of coronary plaques and reproducibility of volumetric analysis. METHODS: A total of 20 patients underwent MSCT coronary angiography using 64 * 0.5 mm detector collimation. Two readers independently visually evaluated all MSCT datasets for the presence of coronary plaques (n = 82 in 262 coronary segments) and then classified them as calcified, mixed and noncalcified. In addition, one of the readers also manually determined total volumes as well as calcified and noncalcified volumes of each plaque. After a period of at least 4 weeks the complete volumetric analysis was repeated. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement was good for detection of coronary plaques on the segment level (weighted kappa = 0.88, 95% CI [0.76, 0.95]). However, there was only moderate interobserver agreement for plaques classification (unweighted kappa = 0.45, 95% CI [0.35, 0.61]). Intraobserver agreement was good for plaque detection on segment level (weighted kappa = 0.90, 95% CI [0.77, 0.96]), while it was moderate with respect to their characterization (unweighted kappa = 0.65, 95% CI [0.55, 0.80]). There was moderate reproducibility for total plaque volume (limits of agreement = +/-6 mm3 at a mean measured volume of 10 mm3 and = +/-28 mm3 at a mean measured volume of 100 mm3). Variation of relative differences significantly decreased for total volume and noncalcified volume with increasing mean volume. CONCLUSIONS: Detection and volumetry of plaques by means of MSCT shows good to moderate reproducibility. Agreement of volume measurements depends on plaque size. Variation of relative differences decrease with increasing mean plaque volume.
Authors: J C Schuurbiers; C von Birgelen; J J Wentzel; N Bom; P W Serruys; P J de Feyter; C J Slager Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Alexander W Leber; Andreas Knez; Carl W White; Alexander Becker; Franz von Ziegler; Olaf Muehling; Christoph Becker; Maximilian Reiser; Gerhard Steinbeck; Peter Boekstegers Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2003-03-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: W G Austen; J E Edwards; R L Frye; G G Gensini; V L Gott; L S Griffith; D C McGoon; M L Murphy; B B Roe Journal: Circulation Date: 1975-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Alexander W Leber; Andreas Knez; Alexander Becker; Christoph Becker; Maximilian Reiser; Gerhard Steinbeck; Peter Boekstegers Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Christof Burgstahler; Anja Reimann; Torsten Beck; Axel Kuettner; Martin Heuschmid; Andreas F Kopp; Stephen Schroeder Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2005-12-20 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Christof Burgstahler; Anja Reimann; Torsten Beck; Axel Kuettner; Dorothee Baumann; Martin Heuschmid; Harald Brodoefel; Claus D Claussen; Andreas F Kopp; Stephen Schroeder Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Annika Schuhbäck; Mohamed Marwan; Sören Gauss; Gerd Muschiol; Dieter Ropers; Christian Schneider; Michael Lell; Johannes Rixe; Christian Hamm; Werner G Daniel; Stephan Achenbach Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-03-27 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Stefan C Saur; Hatem Alkadhi; Paul Stolzmann; Stephan Baumüller; Sebastian Leschka; Hans Scheffel; Lotus Desbiolles; Thomas J Fuchs; Gábor Székely; Philippe C Cattin Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2010-01-30 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Min Su Lee; Eun Ju Chun; Kil Joong Kim; Jeong A Kim; Mani Vembar; Sang Il Choi Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-10-06 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Ryo Nakazato; Aryeh Shalev; Joon-Hyung Doh; Bon-Kwon Koo; Damini Dey; Daniel S Berman; James K Min Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-04-04 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Kristian Altern Øvrehus; Mohamed Marwan; Hans Erik Bøtker; Stephan Achenbach; Bjarne Linde Nørgaard Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-05-29 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Martina C de Knegt; Jesper J Linde; Andreas Fuchs; Børge G Nordestgaard; Lars V Køber; Jens D Hove; Klaus F Kofoed Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-07-04 Impact factor: 2.357