Literature DB >> 23553587

Quantification and characterisation of coronary artery plaque volume and adverse plaque features by coronary computed tomographic angiography: a direct comparison to intravascular ultrasound.

Ryo Nakazato1, Aryeh Shalev, Joon-Hyung Doh, Bon-Kwon Koo, Damini Dey, Daniel S Berman, James K Min.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the performance of manual measures of coronary plaque volumes and atherosclerotic plaque features from coronary CT angiography (CTA), using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) as the reference.
METHODS: Thirty individual coronary plaques with suitable fiduciary markers were identified. Plaque volumes on coronary CTA were manually quantified by two observers and compared to IVUS plaque volumes as interpreted by an independent laboratory. The presence of adverse plaque characteristics-low attenuation plaque (LAP), positive remodelling (PR) and spotty calcification (SC)-on coronary CTA was evaluated and compared to IVUS.
RESULTS: High correlation in plaque volumes was detected between observers (r = 0.94, P < 0.0001; 95 % limits of agreement <48.7 mm(3), bias 6.6 mm(3)). Excellent correlation (r = 0.95, P < 0.0001) was noted in plaque volume between independent observers and IVUS (95 % limits of agreement <40.6 mm(3), bias -4.4 mm(3)) and did not differ from IVUS (105.0 ± 56.7 vs. 109.4 ± 60.7 mm(3), P = 0.2). The frequency of LAP (10 % vs. 17 %), PR (7 % vs. 10 %) and SC (27 % vs. 33 %) was similar between coronary CTA and IVUS (all P = NS).
CONCLUSIONS: Plaque volume on coronary CTA determined by manual methods demonstrates high correlation and modest agreement to IVUS. Further, coronary CTA demonstrates high accuracy for the identification of adverse plaque characteristics, including LAP, PR and SC. KEY POINTS: • Coronary CT angiography is a non-invasive test that enables coronary plaque assessment • Plaque quantification by coronary CT angiography correlates well with intravascular ultrasound findings • Coronary CT angiography can identify adverse plaque characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23553587     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-2822-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  32 in total

Review 1.  American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  G S Mintz; S E Nissen; W D Anderson; S R Bailey; R Erbel; P J Fitzgerald; F J Pinto; K Rosenfield; R J Siegel; E M Tuzcu; P G Yock
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Extent and direction of arterial remodeling in stable versus unstable coronary syndromes : an intravascular ultrasound study.

Authors:  P Schoenhagen; K M Ziada; S R Kapadia; T D Crowe; S E Nissen; E M Tuzcu
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions.

Authors:  P J Scanlon; D P Faxon; A M Audet; B Carabello; G J Dehmer; K A Eagle; R D Legako; D F Leon; J A Murray; S E Nissen; C J Pepine; R M Watson; J L Ritchie; R J Gibbons; M D Cheitlin; T J Gardner; A Garson; R O Russell; T J Ryan; S C Smith
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Variability and accuracy of coronary CT angiography including use of iterative reconstruction algorithms for plaque burden assessment as compared with intravascular ultrasound-an ex vivo study.

Authors:  Paul Stolzmann; Christopher L Schlett; Pal Maurovich-Horvat; Akiko Maehara; Shixin Ma; Hans Scheffel; Leif-Christopher Engel; Mihály Károlyi; Gary S Mintz; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Coronary arterial atherosclerotic plaque imaging by contrast-enhanced computed tomography: fantasy or reality?

Authors:  Kamran Akram; Sarah Rinehart; Szilard Voros
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008-09-21       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Quantification of coronary plaque by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparison with quantitative intracoronary ultrasound.

Authors:  Masato Otsuka; Nico Bruining; Niels C Van Pelt; Nico R Mollet; Jurgen M R Ligthart; Eleni Vourvouri; Ronald Hamers; Peter De Jaegere; William Wijns; Ron T Van Domburg; Gregg W Stone; Susan Veldhof; Stefan Verheye; Dariusz Dudek; Patrick W Serruys; Gabriel P Krestin; Pim J De Feyter
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Automated three-dimensional quantification of noncalcified coronary plaque from coronary CT angiography: comparison with intravascular US.

Authors:  Damini Dey; Tiziano Schepis; Mohamed Marwan; Piotr J Slomka; Daniel S Berman; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Influence of a lipid-lowering therapy on calcified and noncalcified coronary plaques monitored by multislice detector computed tomography: results of the New Age II Pilot Study.

Authors:  Christof Burgstahler; Anja Reimann; Torsten Beck; Axel Kuettner; Dorothee Baumann; Martin Heuschmid; Harald Brodoefel; Claus D Claussen; Andreas F Kopp; Stephen Schroeder
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Effect of intensive compared with moderate lipid-lowering therapy on progression of coronary atherosclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Steven E Nissen; E Murat Tuzcu; Paul Schoenhagen; B Greg Brown; Peter Ganz; Robert A Vogel; Tim Crowe; Gail Howard; Christopher J Cooper; Bruce Brodie; Cindy L Grines; Anthony N DeMaria
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Assessment of changes in non-calcified atherosclerotic plaque volume in the left main and left anterior descending coronary arteries over time by 64-slice computed tomography.

Authors:  Michael Schmid; Stephan Achenbach; Dieter Ropers; Sei Komatsu; Ulrike Ropers; Werner G Daniel; Tobias Pflederer
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive Imaging of Atherosclerotic Plaque Progression: Status of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography.

Authors:  Veit Sandfort; Joao A C Lima; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 2.  A review of serial coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) to assess plaque progression and therapeutic effect of anti-atherosclerotic drugs.

Authors:  Jana Taron; Saeyun Lee; John Aluru; Udo Hoffmann; Michael T Lu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Extraction of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaques From Computed Tomography Imaging: A Review of Recent Methods.

Authors:  Haipeng Liu; Aleksandra Wingert; Jian'an Wang; Jucheng Zhang; Xinhong Wang; Jianzhong Sun; Fei Chen; Syed Ghufran Khalid; Jun Jiang; Dingchang Zheng
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-02-10

Review 4.  Noninvasive imaging in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Ran Heo; Ryo Nakazato; Dan Kalra; James K Min
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.446

5.  Atherosclerotic plaque characteristics by CT angiography identify coronary lesions that cause ischemia: a direct comparison to fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Hyung-Bok Park; Ran Heo; Bríain Ó Hartaigh; Iksung Cho; Heidi Gransar; Ryo Nakazato; Jonathon Leipsic; G B John Mancini; Bon-Kwon Koo; Hiromasa Otake; Matthew J Budoff; Daniel S Berman; Andrejs Erglis; Hyuk-Jae Chang; James K Min
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-01

6.  Coronary plaque burden regression and high-risk plaque reversal: Potential biomarkers for secondary prevention?

Authors:  Janet Wei; Daniel S Berman; Debiao Li
Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 6.677

Review 7.  CFR and FFR assessment with PET and CTA: strengths and limitations.

Authors:  Ryo Nakazato; Ran Heo; Jonathon Leipsic; James K Min
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Computed tomography-based high-risk coronary plaque score to predict acute coronary syndrome among patients with acute chest pain--Results from the ROMICAT II trial.

Authors:  Maros Ferencik; Thomas Mayrhofer; Stefan B Puchner; Michael T Lu; Pal Maurovich-Horvat; Ting Liu; Khristine Ghemigian; Pieter Kitslaar; Alexander Broersen; Fabian Bamberg; Quynh A Truong; Christopher L Schlett; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2015-07-10

Review 9.  Role of computed tomography for diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Dan K Kalra; Ran Heo; Valentina Valenti; Ryo Nakazato; James K Min
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 8.311

10.  Reproducibility of coronary atherosclerotic plaque characteristics in populations with low, intermediate, and high prevalence of coronary artery disease by multidetector computer tomography: a guide to reliable visual coronary plaque assessments.

Authors:  Martina C de Knegt; Jesper J Linde; Andreas Fuchs; Børge G Nordestgaard; Lars V Køber; Jens D Hove; Klaus F Kofoed
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.