Literature DB >> 22661076

Interobserver agreement for the detection of atherosclerotic plaque in coronary CT angiography: comparison of two low-dose image acquisition protocols with standard retrospectively ECG-gated reconstruction.

Annika Schuhbäck1, Mohamed Marwan, Sören Gauss, Gerd Muschiol, Dieter Ropers, Christian Schneider, Michael Lell, Johannes Rixe, Christian Hamm, Werner G Daniel, Stephan Achenbach.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We compared the interobserver variability concerning the detection of calcified and non-calcified plaque in two different low-dose and standard retrospectively gated protocols for coronary CTA.
METHODS: 150 patients with low heart rates and less than 100 kg body weight were randomised and examined by contrast-enhanced dual-source CT coronary angiography (100 kV, 320 mAs). 50 patients were examined with prospectively ECG-triggered axial acquisition, 50 patients with prospectively ECG-triggered high pitch spiral acquisition, and 50 patients using spiral acquisition with retrospective ECG gating. Two investigators independently analysed the datasets concerning the presence of calcified and non-calcified plaque on a per-segment level.
RESULTS: Mean effective dose was 1.4 ± 0.2 mSv for axial, 0.8 ± 0.07 mSv for high-pitch spiral, and 5.3 ± 2.6 mSV for standard spiral acquisition (P < 0.0001). In axial acquisition, interobserver agreement concerning the presence of atherosclerotic plaque was achieved in 650/749 coronary segments (86.8%). In high-pitch spiral acquisition, agreement was achieved in 664/748 segments (88.8%, n.s.). In standard spiral acquisition, agreement was achieved in 672/738 segments (91.0%, P < 0.0001). Interobserver agreement was significantly higher for calcified than for non-calcified plaque in all data acquisition modes.
CONCLUSION: Low-dose coronary CT angiography permits the detection of coronary atherosclerotic plaque with good interobserver agreement. KEY POINTS: • Low-dose CT protocols permit coronary plaque detection with good interobserver agreement. • Image noise is a major predictor of interobserver variability. • Interobserver agreement is significantly higher for calcified than for non-calcified plaque.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22661076     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2389-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  42 in total

1.  Effect of reader experience on variability, evaluation time and accuracy of coronary plaque detection with computed tomography coronary angiography.

Authors:  Stefan C Saur; Hatem Alkadhi; Paul Stolzmann; Stephan Baumüller; Sebastian Leschka; Hans Scheffel; Lotus Desbiolles; Thomas J Fuchs; Gábor Székely; Philippe C Cattin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements.

Authors:  Julius Sim; Chris C Wright
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2005-03

3.  Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose.

Authors:  James P Earls; Elise L Berman; Bruce A Urban; Charlene A Curry; Judith L Lane; Robert S Jennings; Colin C McCulloch; Jiang Hsieh; John H Londt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The prognostic value of multidetector coronary CT angiography for the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events: a multicenter observational cohort study.

Authors:  James K Min; J Feignoux; J Treutenaere; T Laperche; J Sablayrolles
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Incremental prognostic value of cardiac computed tomography in coronary artery disease using CONFIRM: COroNary computed tomography angiography evaluation for clinical outcomes: an InteRnational Multicenter registry.

Authors:  Benjamin J W Chow; Gary Small; Yeung Yam; Li Chen; Stephan Achenbach; Mouaz Al-Mallah; Daniel S Berman; Matthew J Budoff; Filippo Cademartiri; Tracy Q Callister; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Victor Cheng; Kavitha M Chinnaiyan; Augustin Delago; Allison Dunning; Martin Hadamitzky; Jörg Hausleiter; Philipp Kaufmann; Fay Lin; Erica Maffei; Gilbert L Raff; Leslee J Shaw; Todd C Villines; James K Min
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 6.  Imaging of coronary atherosclerosis by computed tomography.

Authors:  Stephan Achenbach; Paolo Raggi
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Noncalcified plaque: relationship between results of multislice computed tomography, risk factors, and late clinical outcome.

Authors:  Niti R Aggarwal; Thomas Knickelbine; Aaron Tande; Luke Stoltzfus; John R Lesser; Robert S Schwartz
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Tips to minimize radiation exposure.

Authors:  Jörg Hausleiter; Tanja Meyer
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2008-08-22

9.  Mortality incidence and the severity of coronary atherosclerosis assessed by computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Matthew P Ostrom; Ambarish Gopal; Naser Ahmadi; Khurram Nasir; Eric Yang; Ioannis Kakadiaris; Ferdinand Flores; Song S Mao; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality.

Authors:  James K Min; Leslee J Shaw; Richard B Devereux; Peter M Okin; Jonathan W Weinsaft; Donald J Russo; Nicholas J Lippolis; Daniel S Berman; Tracy Q Callister
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  5 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of combined coronary angiography and adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging using 320-detector computed tomography: pilot study.

Authors:  Arthur Nasis; Brian S Ko; Michael C Leung; Paul R Antonis; Dee Nandurkar; Dennis T Wong; Leo Kyi; James D Cameron; John M Troupis; Ian T Meredith; Sujith K Seneviratne
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Quantification and characterisation of coronary artery plaque volume and adverse plaque features by coronary computed tomographic angiography: a direct comparison to intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  Ryo Nakazato; Aryeh Shalev; Joon-Hyung Doh; Bon-Kwon Koo; Damini Dey; Daniel S Berman; James K Min
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Reproducibility of coronary atherosclerotic plaque characteristics in populations with low, intermediate, and high prevalence of coronary artery disease by multidetector computer tomography: a guide to reliable visual coronary plaque assessments.

Authors:  Martina C de Knegt; Jesper J Linde; Andreas Fuchs; Børge G Nordestgaard; Lars V Køber; Jens D Hove; Klaus F Kofoed
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Observer variability in the assessment of CT coronary angiography and coronary artery calcium score: substudy of the Scottish COmputed Tomography of the HEART (SCOT-HEART) trial.

Authors:  Michelle C Williams; Saroj K Golay; Amanda Hunter; Jonathan R Weir-McCall; Lucja Mlynska; Marc R Dweck; Neal G Uren; John H Reid; Steff C Lewis; Colin Berry; Edwin J R van Beek; Giles Roditi; David E Newby; Saeed Mirsadraee
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2015-05-19

5.  Coronary artery bypass grafting and perioperative stroke: imaging of atherosclerotic plaques in the ascending aorta with ungated high-pitch CT-angiography.

Authors:  Ulrika Asenbaum; Richard Nolz; Stefan B Puchner; Tobias Schoster; Lukas Baumann; Julia Furtner; Daniel Zimpfer; Guenther Laufer; Christian Loewe; Sigrid E Sandner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.