BACKGROUND: We compared the interobserver variability concerning the detection of calcified and non-calcified plaque in two different low-dose and standard retrospectively gated protocols for coronary CTA. METHODS:150 patients with low heart rates and less than 100 kg body weight were randomised and examined by contrast-enhanced dual-source CT coronary angiography (100 kV, 320 mAs). 50 patients were examined with prospectively ECG-triggered axial acquisition, 50 patients with prospectively ECG-triggered high pitch spiral acquisition, and 50 patients using spiral acquisition with retrospective ECG gating. Two investigators independently analysed the datasets concerning the presence of calcified and non-calcified plaque on a per-segment level. RESULTS: Mean effective dose was 1.4 ± 0.2 mSv for axial, 0.8 ± 0.07 mSv for high-pitch spiral, and 5.3 ± 2.6 mSV for standard spiral acquisition (P < 0.0001). In axial acquisition, interobserver agreement concerning the presence of atherosclerotic plaque was achieved in 650/749 coronary segments (86.8%). In high-pitch spiral acquisition, agreement was achieved in 664/748 segments (88.8%, n.s.). In standard spiral acquisition, agreement was achieved in 672/738 segments (91.0%, P < 0.0001). Interobserver agreement was significantly higher for calcified than for non-calcified plaque in all data acquisition modes. CONCLUSION:Low-dose coronary CT angiography permits the detection of coronary atherosclerotic plaque with good interobserver agreement. KEY POINTS: • Low-dose CT protocols permit coronary plaque detection with good interobserver agreement. • Image noise is a major predictor of interobserver variability. • Interobserver agreement is significantly higher for calcified than for non-calcified plaque.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: We compared the interobserver variability concerning the detection of calcified and non-calcified plaque in two different low-dose and standard retrospectively gated protocols for coronary CTA. METHODS: 150 patients with low heart rates and less than 100 kg body weight were randomised and examined by contrast-enhanced dual-source CT coronary angiography (100 kV, 320 mAs). 50 patients were examined with prospectively ECG-triggered axial acquisition, 50 patients with prospectively ECG-triggered high pitch spiral acquisition, and 50 patients using spiral acquisition with retrospective ECG gating. Two investigators independently analysed the datasets concerning the presence of calcified and non-calcified plaque on a per-segment level. RESULTS: Mean effective dose was 1.4 ± 0.2 mSv for axial, 0.8 ± 0.07 mSv for high-pitch spiral, and 5.3 ± 2.6 mSV for standard spiral acquisition (P < 0.0001). In axial acquisition, interobserver agreement concerning the presence of atherosclerotic plaque was achieved in 650/749 coronary segments (86.8%). In high-pitch spiral acquisition, agreement was achieved in 664/748 segments (88.8%, n.s.). In standard spiral acquisition, agreement was achieved in 672/738 segments (91.0%, P < 0.0001). Interobserver agreement was significantly higher for calcified than for non-calcified plaque in all data acquisition modes. CONCLUSION: Low-dose coronary CT angiography permits the detection of coronary atherosclerotic plaque with good interobserver agreement. KEY POINTS: • Low-dose CT protocols permit coronary plaque detection with good interobserver agreement. • Image noise is a major predictor of interobserver variability. • Interobserver agreement is significantly higher for calcified than for non-calcified plaque.
Authors: Stefan C Saur; Hatem Alkadhi; Paul Stolzmann; Stephan Baumüller; Sebastian Leschka; Hans Scheffel; Lotus Desbiolles; Thomas J Fuchs; Gábor Székely; Philippe C Cattin Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2010-01-30 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: James P Earls; Elise L Berman; Bruce A Urban; Charlene A Curry; Judith L Lane; Robert S Jennings; Colin C McCulloch; Jiang Hsieh; John H Londt Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-01-14 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Benjamin J W Chow; Gary Small; Yeung Yam; Li Chen; Stephan Achenbach; Mouaz Al-Mallah; Daniel S Berman; Matthew J Budoff; Filippo Cademartiri; Tracy Q Callister; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Victor Cheng; Kavitha M Chinnaiyan; Augustin Delago; Allison Dunning; Martin Hadamitzky; Jörg Hausleiter; Philipp Kaufmann; Fay Lin; Erica Maffei; Gilbert L Raff; Leslee J Shaw; Todd C Villines; James K Min Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-07-05 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Niti R Aggarwal; Thomas Knickelbine; Aaron Tande; Luke Stoltzfus; John R Lesser; Robert S Schwartz Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2011-10-05 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Matthew P Ostrom; Ambarish Gopal; Naser Ahmadi; Khurram Nasir; Eric Yang; Ioannis Kakadiaris; Ferdinand Flores; Song S Mao; Matthew J Budoff Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-10-14 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: James K Min; Leslee J Shaw; Richard B Devereux; Peter M Okin; Jonathan W Weinsaft; Donald J Russo; Nicholas J Lippolis; Daniel S Berman; Tracy Q Callister Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2007-09-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Arthur Nasis; Brian S Ko; Michael C Leung; Paul R Antonis; Dee Nandurkar; Dennis T Wong; Leo Kyi; James D Cameron; John M Troupis; Ian T Meredith; Sujith K Seneviratne Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-02-21 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Ryo Nakazato; Aryeh Shalev; Joon-Hyung Doh; Bon-Kwon Koo; Damini Dey; Daniel S Berman; James K Min Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-04-04 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Martina C de Knegt; Jesper J Linde; Andreas Fuchs; Børge G Nordestgaard; Lars V Køber; Jens D Hove; Klaus F Kofoed Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-07-04 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Michelle C Williams; Saroj K Golay; Amanda Hunter; Jonathan R Weir-McCall; Lucja Mlynska; Marc R Dweck; Neal G Uren; John H Reid; Steff C Lewis; Colin Berry; Edwin J R van Beek; Giles Roditi; David E Newby; Saeed Mirsadraee Journal: Open Heart Date: 2015-05-19
Authors: Ulrika Asenbaum; Richard Nolz; Stefan B Puchner; Tobias Schoster; Lukas Baumann; Julia Furtner; Daniel Zimpfer; Guenther Laufer; Christian Loewe; Sigrid E Sandner Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-08-17 Impact factor: 4.379