Literature DB >> 12725760

Are action and perception in near and far space additive or interactive factors?

Peter H Weiss1, John C Marshall, Karl Zilles, Gereon R Fink.   

Abstract

Functional imaging has revealed differential neural mechanisms underlying action directed toward near or far space. Because some neuropsychological studies of patients with visuospatial neglect failed to show near/far dissociations with perceptual tasks, we investigated whether action and perception elicit distinct cerebral representations in near and far space. We measured regional cerebral blood flow with positron emission tomography in normal volunteers who performed manual line bisection (action) and made line bisection judgments (perception). Stimuli were presented in near space or far space. Far space presentation enhanced activations in occipital cortex extending into the medial occipitotemporal cortex bilaterally, while near space presentation enhanced left occipital-parietal, parietal, and premotor cortex activity. Manual bisection activated the extrastriate, superior parietal, and premotor cortex bilaterally, while bisection judgments activated the right inferior parietal cortex, anterior cingulate, right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and extrastriate and superior temporal cortex bilaterally. The neural mechanisms responsible for the two tasks (perceptual/motor) were not differentially modulated by space of presentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12725760     DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00018-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  23 in total

1.  Processing the spatial configuration of complex actions involves right posterior parietal cortex: An fMRI study with clinical implications.

Authors:  Peter H Weiss; Nuh N Rahbari; Silke Lux; Uwe Pietrzyk; Johannes Noth; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Three-dimensional locations and boundaries of motor and premotor cortices as defined by functional brain imaging: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mary A Mayka; Daniel M Corcos; Sue E Leurgans; David E Vaillancourt
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Interaction between spatial inhibition of return (IOR) and executive control in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  Aijun Wang; Zhenzhu Yue; Ming Zhang; Qi Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Complementary hemispheric specialization for language production and visuospatial attention.

Authors:  Qing Cai; Lise Van der Haegen; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Convergent functional architecture of the superior parietal lobule unraveled with multimodal neuroimaging approaches.

Authors:  Jiaojian Wang; Yong Yang; Lingzhong Fan; Jinping Xu; Changhai Li; Yong Liu; Peter T Fox; Simon B Eickhoff; Chunshui Yu; Tianzi Jiang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Near and far space: Understanding the neural mechanisms of spatial attention.

Authors:  Alison R Lane; Keira Ball; Daniel T Smith; Thomas Schenk; Amanda Ellison
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Spatial representations in older adults are not modified by action: Evidence from tool use.

Authors:  Matthew C Costello; Emily K Bloesch; Christopher C Davoli; Nicholas D Panting; Richard A Abrams; James R Brockmole
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2015-06-08

8.  Development of space perception in relation to the maturation of the motor system in infant rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Valentina Sclafani; Elizabeth A Simpson; Stephen J Suomi; Pier Francesco Ferrari
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Is it what you see, or how you say it? Spatial bias in young and aged subjects.

Authors:  Anna M Barrett; Catherine E Craver-Lemley
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.892

Review 10.  [Spatial neglect].

Authors:  G R Fink; W Heide
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.