Literature DB >> 2342639

Components of neglect from right-hemisphere damage: an analysis of line bisection.

P A Reuter-Lorenz1, M I Posner.   

Abstract

Two versions of a line bisection task were given to patients with posterior right-hemisphere damage and normal control subjects. One, which we refer to as the directed-manual task, was the traditional bisection task in which lines were transected with a pen held in the right hand. In the other task, referred to as the directed-visual task, subjects observed the experimenter move a pen along a line from right-to-left (the left-scan task) or from left-to-right (the right-scan task) and they verbally indicated the subjective midpoint. Patients showed significant left neglect in the manual and the left-scan tasks only. Controls showed no consistent biases and no influence of scanning direction. Right and left cues biased bisection for both groups. The results indicate that when the directed manual response is eliminated, scan direction determined the presence or absence of neglect on bisection. The findings are discussed in terms of the efficiency of visual orienting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2342639     DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(90)90059-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  13 in total

1.  Examining the influence of 'noise' on judgements of spatial extent.

Authors:  Derick F Valadao; Marc Hurwitz; James Danckert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The perceptual consequences of the attentional bias: evidence for distractor removal.

Authors:  Matthias Niemeier; Vaughan V W Singh; Matthew Keough; Nadine Akbar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  A case study of new assessment and training of unilateral spatial neglect in stroke patients: effect of visual image transformation and visual stimulation by using a Head Mounted Display system (HMD).

Authors:  Toshiaki Tanaka; Tohru Ifukube; Shunichi Sugihara; Takashi Izumi
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 4.262

4.  Static versus dynamic judgments of spatial extent.

Authors:  Marc Hurwitz; Derick Valadao; James Danckert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Functional MRI of dynamic judgments of spatial extent.

Authors:  Marc Hurwitz; Derick Valadao; James Danckert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The blindside: impact of monocular occlusion on spatial attention.

Authors:  D Brandon Burtis; John B Williamson; Monika Mishra; Kenneth M Heilman
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.475

7.  Hemifield asymmetry in the potency of exogenous auditory and visual cues.

Authors:  Yamaya Sosa; Aaron M Clarke; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 8.  Understanding the parietal lobe syndrome from a neurophysiological and evolutionary perspective.

Authors:  Roberto Caminiti; Matthew V Chafee; Alexandra Battaglia-Mayer; Bruno B Averbeck; David A Crowe; Apostolos P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Is it what you see, or how you say it? Spatial bias in young and aged subjects.

Authors:  Anna M Barrett; Catherine E Craver-Lemley
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.892

10.  Horizontal visual motion modulates focal attention in left unilateral spatial neglect.

Authors:  J B Mattingley; J L Bradshaw; J A Bradshaw
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 10.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.