Literature DB >> 10617294

Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks.

G Jewell1, M E McCourt.   

Abstract

An exhaustive qualitative (vote-counting) review is conducted of the literature concerning visual and non-visual line bisection in neurologically normal subject populations. Although most of these studies report a leftward bisection error (i.e., pseudoneglect), considerable between-study variability and inconsistency characterize this literature. A meta-analysis of this same literature is performed in which the total quantitative data set, comprising 73 studies (or sub-studies) and 2191 subjects, is analyzed with respect to 26 performance factors. The meta-analytic results indicate a significant leftward bisection error in neurologically normal subjects, with an overall effect size of between -0.37 and -0.44 (depending on integration method), which is significantly modulated to varying degrees by a number of additional task or subject variables. For example, visual bisection tasks, midsagittal-pointing tasks and tactile bisection tasks all lead to leftward errors, while kinesthetic tasks result in rightward errors. Tachistoscopic forced-choice testing methods reveal much greater estimates of bisection error (effect size = -1.32) than do manual method-of-adjustment procedures (effect size= -0.40). Subject age significantly modulates line bisection performance such that older subjects err significantly rightward compared to younger subjects, and to veridical line midpoint. Male subjects make slightly larger leftward errors than do female subjects. Handedness has a small effect on bisection errors, with dextrals erring slightly further to the left than sinistral subjects. The hand used to perform manual bisection tasks modulated performance, where use of the left hand lead to greater leftward errors than those obtained using the right hand. One of the most significant factors modulating bisection error is the direction in which subjects initiate motor scanning (with either eye or hand), where a left-to-right scan pattern leads to large leftward errors while a right-to-left scan pattern leads to rightward errors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10617294     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00045-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  269 in total

Review 1.  Spatial neglect.

Authors:  A Kirk
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Representational pseudoneglect and reference points both influence geographic location estimates.

Authors:  Alinda Friedman; Christine Mohr; Peter Brugger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

3.  Right temporoparietal junction and attentional reorienting.

Authors:  Chi-Fu Chang; Tzu-Yu Hsu; Philip Tseng; Wei-Kuang Liang; Ovid J L Tzeng; Daisy L Hung; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Spatial biases in number line bisection tasks are due to a cognitive illusion of length.

Authors:  Elisabeth Stöttinger; Britt Anderson; James Danckert; Barbara Frühholz; Guilherme Wood
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Tapping effects on numerical bisection.

Authors:  Zaira Cattaneo; Micaela Fantino; Juha Silvanto; Giuseppe Vallar; Tomaso Vecchi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Examining the influence of 'noise' on judgements of spatial extent.

Authors:  Derick F Valadao; Marc Hurwitz; James Danckert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Left of centre: asymmetries for the horizontal vertical line illusion.

Authors:  Elisha K Josev; Jason D Forte; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-11-25

8.  Are object- and space-based attentional biases both important to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries?

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Georgina Hughes; Jason B Mattingley; John L Bradshaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Decreased leftward 'aiming' motor-intentional spatial cuing in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Daymond Wagner; Paul J Eslinger; A M Barrett
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  The stronger one-sided relative hypoperfusion, the more pronounced ipsilateral spatial attentional bias in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Jens Göttler; Stephan Kaczmarz; Rachel Nuttall; Vanessa Griese; Natan Napiórkowski; Michael Kallmayer; Isabel Wustrow; Hans-Henning Eckstein; Claus Zimmer; Christine Preibisch; Kathrin Finke; Christian Sorg
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 6.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.