Literature DB >> 1744642

The influence of stimulus properties on visual neglect.

R Tegnér1, M Levander.   

Abstract

Twenty five patients with right cerebral hemisphere damage and neglect participated in a series of bisection experiments. As expected, long lines were bisected to the right of true midpoint. By contrast, large circles and long white paper strips were bisected accurately, or with leftward errors. Small objects were less sensitive to stimulus properties: short lines and paper strips, and small circles, were bisected to the left of true midpoint, and these leftward errors were equally common as rightward errors with long lines. When asked to draw a perpendicular line of the same length as the presented horizontal line, patients overestimated the length of short lines but underestimated that of long lines. Presenting lines in near and far extrapersonal space selectively affected bisection of short lines. The results suggest that two opposing, independent mechanisms determine bisection performance in left neglect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1744642      PMCID: PMC1014572          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.54.10.882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  16 in total

1.  The completion of visual forms across hemianopic field defects.

Authors:  E K WARRINGTON
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1962-08       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Apparent right neglect in patients with left visual neglect.

Authors:  R Tegnér; M Levander; G Caneman
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Line bisection in visuo-spatial neglect: disproof of a conjecture.

Authors:  P W Halligan; J C Marshall
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Halving a horizontal segment: a study on hemisphere-damaged patients with cerebral focal lesions.

Authors:  E Bisiach; E Capitani; A Colombo; H Spinnler
Journal:  Schweiz Arch Neurol Neurochir Psychiatr       Date:  1976

5.  How long is a piece of string? A study of line bisection in a case of visual neglect.

Authors:  P W Halligan; J C Marshall
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  Hemi-inattention and hemisphere specialization: introduction and historical review.

Authors:  R P Friedland; E A Weinstein
Journal:  Adv Neurol       Date:  1977

7.  A simple test of visual neglect.

Authors:  M L Albert
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Visuospatial processes of line bisection and the mechanisms underlying unilateral spatial neglect.

Authors:  S Ishiai; T Furukawa; H Tsukagoshi
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner; J A Walker; F J Friedrich; R D Rafal
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurologic impairment.

Authors:  T Schenkenberg; D C Bradford; E T Ajax
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  10 in total

1.  Biases in attentional orientation and magnitude estimation explain crossover: neglect is a disorder of both.

Authors:  Mark Mennemeier; Christopher A Pierce; Anjan Chatterjee; Britt Anderson; George Jewell; Rachael Dowler; Adam J Woods; Tannahill Glenn; Victor W Mark
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Bias in magnitude estimation following left hemisphere injury.

Authors:  Adam J Woods; Mark Mennemeier; Edgar Garcia-Rill; Jay Meythaler; Victor W Mark; George R Jewel; Heather Murphy
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Improvement in arousal, visual neglect, and perception of stimulus intensity following cold pressor stimulation.

Authors:  Adam J Woods; Mark Mennemeier; Edgar Garcia-Rill; Tiffany Huitt; Kenneth C Chelette; Gary McCullough; Tiffany Munn; Ginger Brown; Thomas S Kiser
Journal:  Neurocase       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 0.881

4.  Crossover by line length and spatial location.

Authors:  M Mennemeier; S Z Rapcsak; C Pierce; E Vezey
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  A search for the optimal stimulus.

Authors:  M Mennemeier; S Z Rapcsak; M Dillon; E Vezey
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Is it what you see, or how you say it? Spatial bias in young and aged subjects.

Authors:  Anna M Barrett; Catherine E Craver-Lemley
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.892

7.  Horizontal visual motion modulates focal attention in left unilateral spatial neglect.

Authors:  J B Mattingley; J L Bradshaw; J A Bradshaw
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Can Crossover and Altered Magnitude Estimation in Neglect Be Explained by Contextual Effects?

Authors:  George R Jewell; Jill Salem; Shannon Hartley; Elsie Vezey; Victor W Mark; Mark S Mennemeier
Journal:  Adv Neurol Neurosci Res       Date:  2022-05-17

9.  Neural Population Dynamics and Cognitive Function.

Authors:  Stephen E Nadeau
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  The reliability of pseudoneglect is task dependent.

Authors:  A G Mitchell; J M Harris; S E Benstock; J M Ales
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 3.139

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.