Literature DB >> 20058945

The effect of hearing-aid compression on judgments of relative distance.

Michael A Akeroyd1.   

Abstract

The overall level of a sound is an important auditory cue to distance in rooms, but this cue might be affected adversely by the amplitude compression found in most modern hearing aids because this explicitly changes levels. This prediction was tested using a synthetic-distance design to measure the just-noticeable difference (JND) in distance from distances of 2 or 5 m. Twenty-six aided listeners participated. The results did not show any effect of compression ratio upon JNDs. A possible interpretation is that the listeners had acclimatized to the effect their aids have on level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20058945      PMCID: PMC3514978          DOI: 10.1121/1.3268505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Auditory localization of nearby sources. II. Localization of a broadband source.

Authors:  D S Brungart; N I Durlach; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Assessing auditory distance perception using virtual acoustics.

Authors:  Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Direct-to-reverberant energy ratio sensitivity.

Authors:  Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  An analysis of cues to auditory depth perception in free space.

Authors:  P D COLEMAN
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1963-05       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 5.  The choice of compression speed in hearing AIDS: theoretical and practical considerations and the role of individual differences.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06

Review 6.  Reorganization of the adult auditory system: perceptual and physiological evidence from monaural fitting of hearing AIDS.

Authors:  Kevin J Munro
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06

7.  A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use.

Authors:  A MacLeod; Q Summerfield
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1990-02

8.  The time course of effects on intensity discrimination following monaural fitting of hearing aids.

Authors:  K Robinson; S Gatehouse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The detection of differences in the cues to distance by elderly hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Michael A Akeroyd; Stuart Gatehouse; Julia Blaschke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).

Authors:  Stuart Gatehouse; William Noble
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.117

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Level discrimination of speech sounds by hearing-impaired individuals with and without hearing amplification.

Authors:  William M Whitmer; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 2.  Auditory distance perception in humans: a review of cues, development, neuronal bases, and effects of sensory loss.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Brian C J Moore; Pavel Zahorik; Silvia Cirstea; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Perception of Auditory Distance in Normal-Hearing and Moderate-to-Profound Hearing-Impaired Listeners.

Authors:  Gilles Courtois; Vincent Grimaldi; Hervé Lissek; Philippe Estoppey; Eleftheria Georganti
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 4.  An overview of the major phenomena of the localization of sound sources by normal-hearing, hearing-impaired, and aided listeners.

Authors:  Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Discrimination of Gain Increments in Speech-Shaped Noises.

Authors:  Benjamin Caswell-Midwinter; William M Whitmer
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.