Literature DB >> 18247908

Effects of spectro-temporal modulation changes produced by multi-channel compression on intelligibility in a competing-speech task.

Michael A Stone1, Brian C J Moore.   

Abstract

These experiments are concerned with the intelligibility of target speech in the presence of a background talker. Using a noise vocoder, Stone and Moore [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 1023-1034 (2003)] showed that single-channel fast-acting compression degraded intelligibility, but slow compression did not. Stone and Moore [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 2311-2323 (2004)] showed that intelligibility was lower when fast single-channel compression was applied to the target and background after mixing rather than before, and suggested that this was partly due to compression after mixing introducing "comodulation" between the target and background talkers. Experiment 1 here showed a similar effect for multi-channel compression. In experiment 2, intelligibility was measured as a function of the speed of multi-channel compression applied after mixing. For both eight- and 12-channel vocoders with one compressor per channel, intelligibility decreased as compression speed increased. For the eight-channel vocoder, a compressor that only affected modulation depth for rates below 2 Hz still reduced intelligibility. Experiment 3 used 12- or 18-channel vocoders. There were between 1 and 12 compression channels, and four speeds of compression. Intelligibility decreased as the number and speed of compression channels increased. The results are interpreted using several measures of the effects of compression, especially "across-source modulation correlation."

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18247908     DOI: 10.1121/1.2821969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  21 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of the xDP output compression strategy for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Alexis Bozorg-Grayeli; Nicolas Guevara; Jean-Pierre Bebear; Marine Ardoint; Sonia Saaï; Michel Hoen; Dan Gnansia; Philippe Romanet; Jean-Pierre Lavieille
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  The choice of compression speed in hearing AIDS: theoretical and practical considerations and the role of individual differences.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06

3.  Filtering to match hearing aid insertion gain to individual ear acoustics.

Authors:  Steven L Bell
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-08-26

4.  The fluctuating masker benefit for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners with equal audibility at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  Kenneth Kragh Jensen; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Exploring the Relationship Between Working Memory, Compressor Speed, and Background Noise Characteristics.

Authors:  Barbara Ohlenforst; Pamela E Souza; Ewen N MacDonald
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Effects of Reverberation and Compression on Consonant Identification in Individuals with Hearing Impairment.

Authors:  Paul N Reinhart; Pamela E Souza; Nirmal K Srinivasan; Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Effects of WDRC release time and number of channels on output SNR and speech recognition.

Authors:  Joshua M Alexander; Katie Masterson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Amplification and consonant modulation spectra.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Frederick Gallun
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Masking Release in Children and Adults With Hearing Loss When Using Amplification.

Authors:  Marc Brennan; Ryan McCreery; Judy Kopun; Dawna Lewis; Joshua Alexander; Patricia Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  The Effects of Dynamic-range Automatic Gain Control on Sentence Intelligibility With a Speech Masker in Simulated Cochlear Implant Listening.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Spencer; Kate Helms Tillery; Christopher A Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.