Literature DB >> 18566807

Effects of spatiotopic factors on bisection of radial lines.

Sergio Chieffi1, Alessandro Iavarone, Sergio Carlomagno.   

Abstract

Under visual guidance normal subjects usually misbisect radial lines farther than the true midpoint (distal bias). We investigated whether this distal bias is constant across the peripersonal space or it varies by varying the distance of the stimulus from the subject. Subjects were asked to bisect radial lines presented below eye level either in the near or far peripersonal space. The results showed an increase of distal bias in the far-space. This finding suggests that the influence of spatial factors on bisection of radial lines is not constant across the peripersonal space. Distal bias increases as a function of the distance of the stimulus from the subject, according to a spatiotopic processing scheme.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18566807     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1458-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  21 in total

1.  Influence of perceptual factors on line bisection.

Authors:  S Chieffi
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Individual variation in line bisection: a study of normal subjects with application to the interpretation of visual neglect.

Authors:  L Manning; P W Halligan; J C Marshall
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Attentional bias in normal subjects performing visual and tactile radial line bisections.

Authors:  J Chewning; J C Adair; E B Heilman; K M Heilman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Effects of stimulus asymmetry on line bisection.

Authors:  S Chieffi
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  The effect of attention on phenomenal length.

Authors:  W Prinzmetal; A Wilson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Altitudinal neglect following traumatic brain injury: a case report.

Authors:  C M Butter; J Evans; N Kirsch; D Kewman
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Why is there a left side underestimation in rod bisection?

Authors:  J L Bradshaw; G Nathan; N C Nettleton; L Wilson; J Pierson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Hand preference and performance effects on line bisection.

Authors:  D J Scarisbrick; J R Tweedy; G Kuslansky
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect.

Authors:  K M Heilman; E Valenstein
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  The effects of unilateral visuospatial neglect on perception of Müller-Lyer illusory figures.

Authors:  J B Mattingley; J L Bradshaw; J A Bradshaw
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  11 in total

1.  Tapping effects on numerical bisection.

Authors:  Zaira Cattaneo; Micaela Fantino; Juha Silvanto; Giuseppe Vallar; Tomaso Vecchi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Hemispheric asymmetries in perceived depth revealed through a radial line bisection task.

Authors:  Ancrêt Szpak; Nicole A Thomas; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Age-related differences in distractor interference on line bisection.

Authors:  Sergio Chieffi; Alessandro Iavarone; Leonardo Iaccarino; Marco La Marra; Giovanni Messina; Vincenzo De Luca; Marcellino Monda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Flanker interference effects in a line bisection task.

Authors:  Sergio Chieffi; Tina Iachini; Alessandro Iavarone; Giovanni Messina; Andrea Viggiano; Marcellino Monda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Visual illusion and line bisection: a bias hypothesis revisited.

Authors:  Sergio Chieffi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Effect of a visual distractor on line bisection.

Authors:  Sergio Chieffi; Alessandro Iavarone; Andrea Viggiano; Marcellino Monda; Sergio Carlomagno
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The thinker: opposing directionality of lighting bias within sculptural artwork.

Authors:  Jennifer R Sedgewick; Bradley Weiers; Aaron Stewart; Lorin J Elias
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 8.  Neuroprotective Effects of Physical Activity: Evidence from Human and Animal Studies.

Authors:  Sergio Chieffi; Giovanni Messina; Ines Villano; Antonietta Messina; Anna Valenzano; Fiorenzo Moscatelli; Monica Salerno; Alessio Sullo; Roberto Avola; Vincenzo Monda; Giuseppe Cibelli; Marcellino Monda
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Memory for Spatial Locations in a Patient with Near Space Neglect and Optic Ataxia: Involvement of the Occipitotemporal Stream.

Authors:  Sergio Chieffi; Giovanni Messina; Antonietta Messina; Ines Villano; Vincenzo Monda; Ferdinando Ivano Ambra; Elisabetta Garofalo; Felice Romano; Maria Pina Mollica; Marcellino Monda; Alessandro Iavarone
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 10.  Exercise Influence on Hippocampal Function: Possible Involvement of Orexin-A.

Authors:  Sergio Chieffi; Giovanni Messina; Ines Villano; Antonietta Messina; Maria Esposito; Vincenzo Monda; Anna Valenzano; Fiorenzo Moscatelli; Teresa Esposito; Marco Carotenuto; Andrea Viggiano; Giuseppe Cibelli; Marcellino Monda
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.