Literature DB >> 3658159

Why is there a left side underestimation in rod bisection?

J L Bradshaw1, G Nathan, N C Nettleton, L Wilson, J Pierson.   

Abstract

Subjects set the extremities of a horizontal rod to appear equidistant from a central reference point, with or without central fixation. On either side, the contrast (salience) of the rod against the background was high or low. Extents to the left were set smaller than those to the right, an effect (LSU) which was stronger with central fixation, indicating that both hemispatial and anatomical pathway factors contribute. Reduced salience on the left increased rather than decreased the LSU, indicating the importance of attentional factors.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3658159     DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(87)90067-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  17 in total

1.  The perceptual consequences of the attentional bias: evidence for distractor removal.

Authors:  Matthias Niemeier; Vaughan V W Singh; Matthew Keough; Nadine Akbar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of spatiotopic factors on bisection of radial lines.

Authors:  Sergio Chieffi; Alessandro Iavarone; Sergio Carlomagno
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Perceptual-attentional and motor-intentional bias in near and far space.

Authors:  John P Garza; Paul J Eslinger; Anna M Barrett
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Static versus dynamic judgments of spatial extent.

Authors:  Marc Hurwitz; Derick Valadao; James Danckert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Memory for locations within regions: spatial biases and visual hemifield differences.

Authors:  B Laeng; M Peters; B McCabe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-01

6.  Flanker interference effects in a line bisection task.

Authors:  Sergio Chieffi; Tina Iachini; Alessandro Iavarone; Giovanni Messina; Andrea Viggiano; Marcellino Monda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Does gravity influence the visual line bisection task?

Authors:  A Drakul; C J Bockisch; A A Tarnutzer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Hemifield asymmetry in the potency of exogenous auditory and visual cues.

Authors:  Yamaya Sosa; Aaron M Clarke; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Programmable visual display for diagnosing, assessing and rehabilitating unilateral neglect.

Authors:  R J Dick; R G Wood; J L Bradshaw; J A Bradshaw
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Time-on-task effect in pseudoneglect.

Authors:  André Dufour; Pascale Touzalin; Victor Candas
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.