Literature DB >> 426480

Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect.

K M Heilman, E Valenstein.   

Abstract

If patients with left-sided hemispatial neglect bisect lines incorrectly because hemianopia or sensory hemiinattention prevents them from seeing how far the line extends to the left, a strategy that ensures their seeing the left side of the line in their normal field should improve performance. If patients have hemispatial hypokinesia, moving the line toward the normal half of body space should improve performance. Six patients with left-sided neglect from right hemisphere infarctions were required to identify a letter at either the right or the left end of a line before bisecting that line. The task was given with the lines placed at either the right, the center, or the left of the body midline. Performance in trials when subjects were required to look to the left before bisecting a line did not differ from when they were required to look right. Performance was significantly better when the line was placed to the right side of the body than to the left. These observations support the hypothesis that patients with hemispatial neglect have hemispatial hypokinesia. An alternative hypothesis is that these subjects had a hemispatial memory defect. Although they saw the left side of the line in their normal field, they were incapable of forming a stable trace and performed as if they did not see the left side of the line.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 426480     DOI: 10.1002/ana.410050210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Neurol        ISSN: 0364-5134            Impact factor:   10.422


  105 in total

1.  Line versus representational bisections in unilateral spatial neglect.

Authors:  S Ishiai; Y Koyama; K Seki; M Izawa
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Evidence for a unimodal somatosensory attention system.

Authors:  Elizabeth Olson; Marianna Stark; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Ocular scanning and perceptual size distortion in hemispatial neglect: effects of prism adaptation and sequential stimulus presentation.

Authors:  H Chris Dijkerman; Robert D McIntosh; A David Milner; Yves Rossetti; Caroline Tilikete; Richard C Roberts
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The neural basis of the bilateral distribution advantage.

Authors:  Stefan Pollmann; Eran Zaidel; D Yves von Cramon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Leftward search in left unilateral spatial neglect.

Authors:  S Ishiai; M Sugishita; K Mitani; M Ishizawa
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Human consciousness and its relationship to social neuroscience: A novel hypothesis.

Authors:  Michael S A Graziano; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.065

7.  Motor role of parietal cortex in a monkey model of hemispatial neglect.

Authors:  Jan Kubanek; Jingfeng M Li; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Line copying: distinct "where" and "aiming" spatial bias in healthy adults.

Authors:  Priyanka P Shah; Keith O Gonzalez; A M Barrett
Journal:  Cogn Behav Neurol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.600

9.  Pure homonymous hemiachromatopsia. Findings with neuro-ophthalmologic examination and imaging procedures.

Authors:  H W Kölmel
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci       Date:  1988

10.  Contralateral and ipsilateral disorders of visual attention in patients with unilateral brain damage.

Authors:  G Gainotti; L Giustolisi; U Nocentini
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 10.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.