Literature DB >> 3658153

Hand preference and performance effects on line bisection.

D J Scarisbrick1, J R Tweedy, G Kuslansky.   

Abstract

Right- and left-handed subjects performed a visual line bisection task with each hand. When bisecting horizontal lines, both groups bisected left of true center regardless of hand used. Regardless of hand preference, bisections were significantly left of center only when subjects performed with their left hand. Left-handed subjects using their left hand deviated significantly further left than right-handed subjects using their left hand. Regardless of hand used, right-handers bisected vertical lines significantly above veridical center. Left-handed subjects were not significantly above center with either hand. The results require both hemispheric advantage and lateralized activation effects for a complete explanation.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3658153     DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(87)90061-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  23 in total

1.  Line bisection by eye and by hand reveal opposite biases.

Authors:  Ute Leonards; Samantha Stone; Christine Mohr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Anticlockwise or clockwise? A dynamic Perception-Action-Laterality model for directionality bias in visuospatial functioning.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Michael J Proulx; Lora T Likova
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Effects of spatiotopic factors on bisection of radial lines.

Authors:  Sergio Chieffi; Alessandro Iavarone; Sergio Carlomagno
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The blindside: impact of monocular occlusion on spatial attention.

Authors:  D Brandon Burtis; John B Williamson; Monika Mishra; Kenneth M Heilman
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.475

5.  Age-related differences in distractor interference on line bisection.

Authors:  Sergio Chieffi; Alessandro Iavarone; Leonardo Iaccarino; Marco La Marra; Giovanni Messina; Vincenzo De Luca; Marcellino Monda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Flanker interference effects in a line bisection task.

Authors:  Sergio Chieffi; Tina Iachini; Alessandro Iavarone; Giovanni Messina; Andrea Viggiano; Marcellino Monda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Effects of cueing on visuospatial processing in unilateral spatial neglect.

Authors:  S Ishiai; K Seki; Y Koyama; R Okiyama
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Visual illusion and line bisection: a bias hypothesis revisited.

Authors:  Sergio Chieffi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Corpus Callosum Maturation and Line Bisection Performance in Healthy Children.

Authors:  Dalin T Pulsipher; Michael Seidenberg; Bruce P Hermann
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.978

10.  Shifting attentional priorities: control of spatial attention through hemispheric competition.

Authors:  Sara M Szczepanski; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.