Literature DB >> 18566177

Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog.

Fred A Mettler1, Walter Huda, Terry T Yoshizumi, Mahadevappa Mahesh.   

Abstract

Medical uses of radiation have grown very rapidly over the past decade, and, as of 2007, medical uses represent the largest source of exposure to the U.S. population. Most physicians have difficulty assessing the magnitude of exposure or potential risk. Effective dose provides an approximate indicator of potential detriment from ionizing radiation and should be used as one parameter in evaluating the appropriateness of examinations involving ionizing radiation. The purpose of this review is to provide a compilation of effective doses for radiologic and nuclear medicine procedures. Standard radiographic examinations have average effective doses that vary by over a factor of 1000 (0.01-10 mSv). Computed tomographic examinations tend to be in a more narrow range but have relatively high average effective doses (approximately 2-20 mSv), and average effective doses for interventional procedures usually range from 5-70 mSv. Average effective dose for most nuclear medicine procedures varies between 0.3 and 20 mSv. These doses can be compared with the average annual effective dose from background radiation of about 3 mSv. (c) RSNA, 2008.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18566177     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2481071451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  445 in total

1.  Exposing exposure: automated anatomy-specific CT radiation exposure extraction for quality assurance and radiation monitoring.

Authors:  Aaron Sodickson; Graham I Warden; Cameron E Farkas; Ichiro Ikuta; Luciano M Prevedello; Katherine P Andriole; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  CT colonography: perforation rates and potential radiation risks.

Authors:  A Berrington de Gonzalez; Kwang Pyo Kim; Judy Yee
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2010-04

Review 3.  Understanding the genetics of coronary artery disease through the lens of noninvasive imaging.

Authors:  Eunice Yang; Jose D Vargas; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2012-01

4.  Effective dose delivered by conventional radiology to Aosta Valley population between 2002 and 2009.

Authors:  F Zenone; S Aimonetto; P Catuzzo; A Peruzzo Cornetto; P Marchisio; M Natrella; A M Rosanò; T Meloni; M Pasquino; S Tofani
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Low-dose cardiovascular computed tomography: where are the limits?

Authors:  Paul Schoenhagen; Carla M Thompson; Sandra S Halliburton
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Non-invasive visualisation and volume estimation of maggot masses using computed tomography scanning.

Authors:  Aidan Johnson; Melanie Archer; Lyndie Leigh-Shaw; Matthew Brown; Chris O'Donnell; James Wallman
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.686

7.  Evaluation of coronary angiographic projections to balance the clinical yield with the radiation risk.

Authors:  I R Smith; J Cameron; K L Mengersen; J T Rivers
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  In vivo changes in plasma coenzyme Q10, carotenoid, tocopherol, and retinol levels in children after computer tomography.

Authors:  Brunhild M Halm; Jennifer F Lai; Cynthia M Morrison; Ian Pagano; Laurie J Custer; Robert V Cooney; Adrian A Franke
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 4.013

9.  Standardization and optimization of CT protocols to achieve low dose.

Authors:  Sigal Trattner; Gregory D N Pearson; Cynthia Chin; Dianna D Cody; Rajiv Gupta; Christopher P Hess; Mannudeep K Kalra; James M Kofler; Mayil S Krishnam; Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.532

10.  Trends in CT scan rates in children and pregnant women: teaching, private, public and nonprofit facilities.

Authors:  Sumi Hoshiko; Daniel Smith; Cathyn Fan; Carrie R Jones; Sandra V McNeel; Ronald A Cohen
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-02-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.