Literature DB >> 26319311

Temporal and rate code analysis of responses to low-frequency components in the bird's own song by song system neurons.

Makoto Fukushima1, Peter L Rauske2, Daniel Margoliash3,2.   

Abstract

Auditory feedback (AF) plays a critical role in vocal learning. Previous studies in songbirds suggest that low-frequency (<~1 kHz) components may be salient cues in AF. We explored this with auditory stimuli including the bird's own song (BOS) and BOS variants with increased relative power at low frequencies (LBOS). We recorded single units from BOS-selective neurons in two forebrain nuclei (HVC and Area X) in anesthetized zebra finches. Song-evoked responses were analyzed based on both rate (spike counts) and temporal coding of spike trains. The BOS and LBOS tended to evoke similar spike-count responses in substantially overlapping populations of neurons in both HVC and Area X. Analysis of spike patterns demonstrated temporal coding information that discriminated among the BOS and LBOS stimuli significantly better than spike counts in the majority of HVC (94 %) and Area X (85 %) neurons. HVC neurons contained more and a broader range of temporal coding information to discriminate among the stimuli than Area X neurons. These results are consistent with a role of spike timing in coding differences in the spectral components of BOS in HVC and Area X neurons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory feedback; HVC; Temporal coding; Zebra finch

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26319311      PMCID: PMC4633354          DOI: 10.1007/s00359-015-1037-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  53 in total

1.  State and neuronal class-dependent reconfiguration in the avian song system.

Authors:  Peter L Rauske; Stephen D Shea; Daniel Margoliash
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Fast algorithm for the metric-space analysis of simultaneous responses of multiple single neurons.

Authors:  Dmitriy Aronov
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 3.  The role of auditory feedback in birdsong.

Authors:  Masakazu Konishi
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Evidence for "direct" and "indirect" pathways through the song system basal ganglia.

Authors:  Michael A Farries; Long Ding; David J Perkel
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2005-03-28       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Invariance and sensitivity to intensity in neural discrimination of natural sounds.

Authors:  Cyrus P Billimoria; Benjamin J Kraus; Rajiv Narayan; Ross K Maddox; Kamal Sen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Bengalese finches Lonchura Striata domestica depend upon auditory feedback for the maintenance of adult song.

Authors:  S M Woolley; E W Rubel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Anterior forebrain neurons develop selectivity by an intermediate stage of birdsong learning.

Authors:  M M Solis; A J Doupe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Acoustic parameters underlying the responses of song-specific neurons in the white-crowned sparrow.

Authors:  D Margoliash
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Novel motor gestures for phonation during inspiration enhance the acoustic complexity of birdsong.

Authors:  F Goller; M A Daley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Songbirds use pulse tone register in two voices to generate low-frequency sound.

Authors:  Kenneth K Jensen; Brenton G Cooper; Ole N Larsen; Franz Goller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  2 in total

1.  A Spike Train Distance Robust to Firing Rate Changes Based on the Earth Mover's Distance.

Authors:  Duho Sihn; Sung-Phil Kim
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 2.380

2.  Stimulus Driven Single Unit Activity From Micro-Electrocorticography.

Authors:  John Hermiz; Lorraine Hossain; Ezequiel M Arneodo; Mehran Ganji; Nicholas Rogers; Nasim Vahidi; Eric Halgren; Timothy Q Gentner; Shadi A Dayeh; Vikash Gilja
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 4.677

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.