Literature DB >> 27798189

A Decline in Response Variability Improves Neural Signal Detection during Auditory Task Performance.

Gardiner von Trapp1, Bradley N Buran2, Kamal Sen3, Malcolm N Semple2,4, Dan H Sanes2,4,5.   

Abstract

The detection of a sensory stimulus arises from a significant change in neural activity, but a sensory neuron's response is rarely identical to successive presentations of the same stimulus. Large trial-to-trial variability would limit the central nervous system's ability to reliably detect a stimulus, presumably affecting perceptual performance. However, if response variability were to decrease while firing rate remained constant, then neural sensitivity could improve. Here, we asked whether engagement in an auditory detection task can modulate response variability, thereby increasing neural sensitivity. We recorded telemetrically from the core auditory cortex of gerbils, both while they engaged in an amplitude-modulation detection task and while they sat quietly listening to the identical stimuli. Using a signal detection theory framework, we found that neural sensitivity was improved during task performance, and this improvement was closely associated with a decrease in response variability. Moreover, units with the greatest change in response variability had absolute neural thresholds most closely aligned with simultaneously measured perceptual thresholds. Our findings suggest that the limitations imposed by response variability diminish during task performance, thereby improving the sensitivity of neural encoding and potentially leading to better perceptual sensitivity. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The detection of a sensory stimulus arises from a significant change in neural activity. However, trial-to-trial variability of the neural response may limit perceptual performance. If the neural response to a stimulus is quite variable, then the response on a given trial could be confused with the pattern of neural activity generated when the stimulus is absent. Therefore, a neural mechanism that served to reduce response variability would allow for better stimulus detection. By recording from the cortex of freely moving animals engaged in an auditory detection task, we found that variability of the neural response becomes smaller during task performance, thereby improving neural detection thresholds.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/3611097-10$15.00/0.

Keywords:  amplitude modulation; attention; auditory cortex; neurometric; signal detection theory

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27798189      PMCID: PMC5098844          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1302-16.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  65 in total

1.  Effects of attention on the reliability of individual neurons in monkey visual cortex.

Authors:  C J McAdams; J H Maunsell
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance.

Authors:  K H Britten; M N Shadlen; W T Newsome; J A Movshon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Unsupervised spike detection and sorting with wavelets and superparamagnetic clustering.

Authors:  R Quian Quiroga; Z Nadasdy; Y Ben-Shaul
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.026

4.  Neural representations of temporally modulated signals in the auditory thalamus of awake primates.

Authors:  Edward L Bartlett; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Invariance and sensitivity to intensity in neural discrimination of natural sounds.

Authors:  Cyrus P Billimoria; Benjamin J Kraus; Rajiv Narayan; Ross K Maddox; Kamal Sen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Unraveling the attentional functions of cortical cholinergic inputs: interactions between signal-driven and cognitive modulation of signal detection.

Authors:  Martin Sarter; Michael E Hasselmo; John P Bruno; Ben Givens
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2005-02

Review 7.  Waking State: Rapid Variations Modulate Neural and Behavioral Responses.

Authors:  Matthew J McGinley; Martin Vinck; Jacob Reimer; Renata Batista-Brito; Edward Zagha; Cathryn R Cadwell; Andreas S Tolias; Jessica A Cardin; David A McCormick
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Cortical areas are revealed by distribution patterns of proteoglycan components and parvalbumin in the Mongolian gerbil and rat.

Authors:  G Brückner; G Seeger; K Brauer; W Härtig; J Kacza; V Bigl
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1994-09-26       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Basal forebrain activation enhances cortical coding of natural scenes.

Authors:  Michael Goard; Yang Dan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-04       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Engaging in an auditory task suppresses responses in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Gonzalo H Otazu; Lung-Hao Tai; Yang Yang; Anthony M Zador
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  19 in total

1.  A Hierarchy of Time Scales for Discriminating and Classifying the Temporal Shape of Sound in Three Auditory Cortical Fields.

Authors:  Ahmad F Osman; Christopher M Lee; Monty A Escabí; Heather L Read
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Neural coding and perception of auditory motion direction based on interaural time differences.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Zuk; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Neural Variability Limits Adolescent Skill Learning.

Authors:  Melissa L Caras; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Top-down modulation of sensory cortex gates perceptual learning.

Authors:  Melissa L Caras; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Effects of Gap Position on Perceptual Gap Detection Across Late Childhood and Adolescence.

Authors:  Jennifer D Gay; Merri J Rosen; Julia Jones Huyck
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-02

6.  Early Visual Motion Experience Improves Retinal Encoding of Motion Directions.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Qiwen Wu; Yifeng Zhang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  De novo sequencing and initial annotation of the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus) genome.

Authors:  Diego A R Zorio; Scott Monsma; Dan H Sanes; Nace L Golding; Edwin W Rubel; Yuan Wang
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 5.736

8.  Quantifying Neuronal Information Flow in Response to Frequency and Intensity Changes in the Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Ketan Mehta; Jörg Kliewer; Antje Ihlefeld
Journal:  Conf Rec Asilomar Conf Signals Syst Comput       Date:  2019-02-21

9.  Eye movements reflect adaptive predictions and predictive precision.

Authors:  Leah Bakst; Joseph T McGuire
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2020-10-12

10.  Choice-related activity and neural encoding in primary auditory cortex and lateral belt during feature-selective attention.

Authors:  Jennifer L Mohn; Joshua D Downer; Kevin N O'Connor; Jeffrey S Johnson; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.