Literature DB >> 18560876

Biological tolerance values: change in a paradigm concept from assessment of a single value to use of an average.

Hans Drexler1, Thomas Göen, Karl Heinz Schaller.   

Abstract

Since 1981 biological tolerance values for occupational exposure (BAT values) have been published in the List of MAK and BAT Values of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). In 2007 the list includes threshold limit values for more than 90 substances. The BAT value was defined as the maximum permissible quantity of a chemical substance or its metabolites or the maximum permissible deviation from the norm of biological parameters induced by these substances. The biological limit values derived by other commissions (ACGIH, SCOEL) are to be understood as averages, which may well be exceeded individually, in contrast to the BAT values that were defined as ceiling values and thus did not allow an excess of values in the individual employee. The DFG Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area has now revised the concept of biological limit values. The BAT value describes the concentration of a chemical substance, of its metabolites or of an effect indicator in appropriate biological material derived by occupational medical and toxicological criteria, at which the health of an employee is usually not affected, even after repeated or long-term exposure. In this case, derivation of the BAT value is based on the average internal exposures. With this redefinition of the German BAT value, it will be possible to better harmonize the values with those provided by other commissions, which are also based on an average concept.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18560876     DOI: 10.1007/s00420-008-0331-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 0340-0131            Impact factor:   3.015


  4 in total

1.  An analysis of criteria for biological limit values developed in Germany and in the United States.

Authors:  M S Morgan; K H Schaller
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Occupational exposure limits based on biological monitoring: the Japan Society for Occupational Health.

Authors:  K Omae; T Takebayashi; H Sakurai
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Biological monitoring values for occupational exposure: a United Kingdom perspective.

Authors:  H K Wilson
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Validity of biological tests in epidemiological toxicology.

Authors:  R L Zielhuis; M M Verberk
Journal:  Int Arch Arbeitsmed       Date:  1974-01-04
  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Biological reference values for chemical compounds in the work area (BARs): an approach for evaluating biomonitoring data.

Authors:  Thomas Göen; Karl-Heinz Schaller; Hans Drexler
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  The burden of chronic mercury intoxication in artisanal small-scale gold mining in Zimbabwe: data availability and preliminary estimates.

Authors:  Nadine Steckling; Stephan Bose-O'Reilly; Paulo Pinheiro; Dietrich Plass; Dennis Shoko; Gustav Drasch; Ludovic Bernaudat; Uwe Siebert; Claudia Hornberg
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 5.984

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.