| Literature DB >> 25495641 |
Nadine Steckling1, Stephan Bose-O'Reilly, Paulo Pinheiro, Dietrich Plass, Dennis Shoko, Gustav Drasch, Ludovic Bernaudat, Uwe Siebert, Claudia Hornberg.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Artisanal small-scale gold mining (ASGM) is a poverty-driven activity practiced in over 70 countries worldwide. Zimbabwe is amongst the top ten countries using large quantities of mercury to extract gold from ore. This analysis was performed to check data availability and derive a preliminary estimate of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) due to mercury use in ASGM in Zimbabwe.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25495641 PMCID: PMC4290131 DOI: 10.1186/1476-069X-13-111
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health ISSN: 1476-069X Impact factor: 5.984
Formulas of the analysis
| Formula 1 - Disease point prevalence in the sample (%) | |
| P = Prevalence (in %) of the disease in the sample | |
| D = Number of diseased cases in the sample | |
| E = Number of individuals in the sample | |
| i = Age and sex group category i | |
| Formula 2 - Exposure point prevalence in the total population (%) |
|
| EPi = Prevalence (in %) of the exposure in the total population | |
| Xi = Number of exposed individuals in the total population | |
| Ti = Total population | |
| i = Age and sex group category i | |
| Formula 3 - Disease point prevalence in the total population (%) |
|
| P2 = Prevalence (in %) of the disease in the total population | |
| X = Number of exposed individuals in the total population | |
| P = Prevalence (in %) of the disease in the sample | |
| i = Age and sex group category i | |
| Formula 4 - Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) |
|
| DALY = Disability-adjusted life years | |
| YLD = Years lived with disability | |
| a = Number of incident cases | |
| b = Disability weight | |
| c = Average duration of disability | |
| YLL = Years of life lost due to premature mortality | |
| d = Number of deaths | |
| e = Standard life expectancy at the age of death | |
| i = Age and sex group category i | |
| Formula 5 - Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) per 1,000 population |
|
| DALYr = DALYs per 1,000 population | |
| DALY = Number of total DALYs | |
| T = Total population | |
| i = Age and sex group category i |
Underlying assumptions for the analysis
| a. | Artisanal small-scale gold miners are considered to have an ongoing occupational exposure to mercury. |
| b. | The diagnostic tool by Drasch et al. [ |
| c. | The health burden quantified only included the health endpoint “chronic mercury intoxication” (diagnosed according to Drasch et al. [ |
| d. | The numbers and distribution of the age and sex subgroups of actively involved miners are assumed to be representative of the ASGM sector in Zimbabwe in 2004. |
| e. | The prevalence of chronic mercury intoxication observed in the sample from Kadoma is representative of all of Zimbabwe in the year 2004. |
| f. | The proportion of panners and smelter workers in the sample from Kadoma district is representative of the entire population of Zimbabwe. |
| g. | The modeled data (incidence, duration of disease, etc.) are representative of the disease situation in Zimbabwe. |
| h. | The severity of chronic mercury intoxication is comparable to the severity of alcoholism, which justifies using the same disability weight. |
| i. | The severity of chronic mercury intoxication excludes mortality as a consequence. |
| j. | The severity of chronic mercury intoxication excludes remissions. |
| k. | The miners included in the study had not received medical treatment for their condition. |
| l. | The life expectancy of the miners is assumed to be 80 years for males and 82.5 years for females as given in the standard life expectancy table (Standard West Level 26 life table; [ |
The results of this analysis rest on these assumptions. Changing the assumptions will require changing the analysis.
Diagnosis of chronic mercury intoxication (adapted from[32])
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Hg in all biomonitors <HBM I | no intoxication | no intoxication | no intoxication | ||
| Hg in at least one biomonitor >HBM I and <HMB II | no intoxication | no intoxication | intoxication | ||
| Hg in at least one biomonitor >HBM II and <BAT | no intoxication | intoxication | intoxication | ||
| Hg in at least one biomonitor >BAT | intoxication | intoxication | intoxication | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| <HBM I | 0-<5 | 0-<7 | 0-<5 | 0-<1 | |
| >HBM I and <HBM II | 5-<15 | 7-<25 | 5-<20 | 1-<5 | |
| >HBM II and < BAT | 15-<25 | 25-<30 | 20-<25 | ≥5 | |
| >BAT | ≥25 | ≥30 | ≥25 | ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
| (0/1): 0= negative; 1= positive; (0/1/2): 0= good, 1= restricted, 2= poor performance; maximum medical score sum: 21 points | Metallic taste (0/1) | Bluish coloring of the gingiva (0/1) | Frostig test1 (0/1/2) | ||
| Excessive salivation (0/1) | Ataxia of gait (0/1) | Matchboxtest2 (0/1/2) | |||
| Tremor at work (0/1) | Finger-to-nose tremor (0/1) | Memory test3 (0/1/2) | |||
| Sleeping problems at night (0/1) | Dysdiadochokinesia (0/1) | Pencil tapping test4 (0/1/2) | |||
| Health problems worsened since | Heel-to-knee ataxia (0/1) | ||||
| having been exposed to | Heel-to-knee tremor (0/1) | ||||
| mercury (0/1) | Mento-labialreflex (0/1) | ||||
| Proteinuria (0/1) | |||||
*HBM I and II for blood and urine [34–36]; BAT for blood and urine [37]. HBM I for hair derived by Drasch et al. [32] from the U.S. EPA [38] benchmark limit. HBM II for hair derived by Drasch et al. [32] from the HBM II value for blood [34–36] in combination with results from the Seychelles study [39].
1Frostig test for examining tremor and visual-motor capacity: The test person must draw a straight line from one symbol to another across a narrow gap without touching the surrounding areas or breaking the line. This is a subtest of a more detailed test by Lockowandt [40].
2Matchbox test for examining coordination, intentional tremor and concentration: The test person must collect matches and put them in the matchbox as quickly as possible while alternating hand. The matchbox test is part of the MOT (Motoriktest) test battery developed by Zimmer and Volkamer [41].
3Memory test for short-term memory: The test subject must repeat numbers shown in columns in the correct order. This test was developed by Masur [42].
4Pencil tapping test for examining intentional tremor and coordination: The test person must make as many dots as possible in 10 seconds by repeatedly tapping a pencil on a piece of paper. This test is also part of the MOT battery [41].
BAT: Biologischer Arbeitsplatztoleranzwert, the maximum acceptable concentration at the workplace; crea.: creatinine; HBM I and II: Human Biomonitoring values from the Human Biomonitoring Commission of the Federal Environmental Agency; Hg: mercury.
Sample prevalence and assumed distribution of exposed miners in Zimbabwe around 2004
| Column A | B | C | D | E | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subgroups of artisanal small-scale gold (ASG) miners | Sample prevalence of chronic mercury intoxication in ASG miners* | Main analysis: Numbers and percentages**of ASG miners assumed for Zimbabwe | Sources of numbers and percentages marked in bold in column C | Scenario analysis: numbers and percentage distribution assumed for Zimbabwe (scenario range) | |||||
| Min. | Source | Max. | Source | ||||||
|
| 72% | (131/181) |
| 100% | [ | No variation | 500,000 | [ | |
|
| 72% | (118/164) | 297,500 |
| GMP 2004 | No variation | 98% of T | [ | |
| Males (M) | 90% | (95/106) | 208,250 |
| Mid-value of reported data*** | 50% of A | [ | 89% of A | [ |
| 15-24 | 91% | (41/45) | 74,350 |
| GMP 2004 cross-checked against Mtetwa and Shava [ | No variation | |||
| 25-34 | 88% | (35/40) | 86,000 |
| |||||
| 35-41 | 90% | (19/21) | 21,450 |
| |||||
| 42+ | 26,450 |
| |||||||
| Females (F) | 40% | (23/58) | 89,250 |
| Mid-value of reported data*** | 11% of A | [ | 50% of A | [ |
| 15-24 | 26% | (7/27) | 31,860 |
| GMP 2004 cross-checked against Mtetwa and Shava [ | No variation | |||
| 25-34 | 52% | (16/31) | 36,860 |
| |||||
| 35-41 | 9,190 |
| |||||||
| 42+ | 11,340 |
| |||||||
|
| 76% | (13/17) | 52,500 |
| GMP 2004 | 2% of T | [ | No variation | |
| Male (M) | 38,500 |
| |||||||
| Female (F) | 14,000 |
| |||||||
*The data were taken from the Global Mercury Project (GMP), conducted by UNIDO in Zimbabwe in 2004 [5, 12], and from a health and biomonitoring project focusing on women of child-bearing age and their infants, conducted in Zimbabwe in 2006 by the University of Munich (LMU; Germany) [48]. The sample prevalence of the control group is 0%. The sample prevalence (in %) in every subgroup is determined using Formula 1, Table 1. The number of intoxicated and the subgroup size are shown between parentheses.
**Numbers and percentages are rounded and include uncertainties because their distribution was derived using the estimates given in the sources in column D.
***References consulted with estimates for Zimbabwe [8, 9, 50, 52, 53] cross-checked against the GMP 2004.
‘Adults: individuals 15 years and older.
”Children: individuals aged 9–14; children aged 0–8 were not assumed to be occupationally exposed.
A: adults; F: females; GMP 2004: own analysis using data from the Global Mercury Project 2004 for Zimbabwe; M: males; Max.: maximum; Min.: minimum; T: total.
Extrapolated percentages of exposed and intoxicated miners in Zimbabwe
| Sex and age groups | Total population [[ | Main analysis* | Scenario analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum scenario** | Maximum scenario*** | |||||
| % exposed of the total population | % of the total population showing intoxication | |||||
| Male and female | Total | 12,492,000 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 0-8 | 3,069,000 | (−) | (−) | (−) | (−) | |
| 9-14 | 2,080,000 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| 15+ | 7,343,000 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Male | Total | 6,067,000 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| 0-8 | 1,540,000 | (−) | (−) | (−) | (−) | |
| 9-14 | 1,042,000 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | |
| 15+ | 3,485,000 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 11 | |
| 15-24 | 1,533,000 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 9 | |
| 25-34 | 871,000 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 18 | |
| 35-41 | 293,000 | 7 | 6 | 14 | ||
| 42+ | 788,000 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Female | Total | 6,425,000 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 0-8 | 1,529,000 | (−) | (−) | (−) | (−) | |
| 9-14 | 1,038,000 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 15+ | 3,858,000 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |
| 15-24 | 1,552,000 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 25-34 | 870,000 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 1 | |
| 35-41 | 353,000 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | |
| 42+ | 1,083,000 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
All numbers and percentages are rounded.
*The main analysis includes the numbers given in Table 4 (Column C).
**The minimum scenario means that the lowest total prevalence is reached. Included are the following numbers: 350,000 occupationally exposed; 50% of the adults are female; 2% of the total are children (see Table 4 for sources).
***The maximum scenario means that the highest total prevalence is reached. Included are the following numbers: 500,000 occupationally exposed; 11% of the adults are female; 2% of the total are children (see Table 4 for sources). In the maximum scenario, there is a low disease prevalence of women and children compared to the minimum scenario, because of the higher sample prevalence of adults compared to children and men vs. women (Table 4). Hence, the maximum scenario is reached when the lowest involvement of children and women is assumed.
(-) children aged 0–8 were not assumed to be occupationally exposed.
Modeled epidemiological data, YLL and YLD for sex and age groups (main analysis)
| Age*(years) | Chronic mercury intoxication | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Death cases** | YLL | Incident cases** | Duration of disease (years)** | YLD# | |
| Occupationally exposed males (n = 246,750; see Table | |||||
|
| <1 | <10 | 200 | 44 | 1200 |
|
| <1 | <10 | 4,900 | 40 | 28,900 |
|
| 1 | 20 | 7,000 | 35 | 38,200 |
|
| <1 | 10 | 2,300 | 26 | 10,100 |
|
| <1 | <10 | <100 | 21 | <100 |
|
| 1 | 20 | <100 | 15 | <100 |
|
| 2 | 50 | 14,400 | (average) 35 | 78,400 |
| Occupationally exposed females (n = 103,250; see Table | |||||
|
| <1 | <10 | <100 | 48 | 500 |
|
| <1 | <10 | 600 | 43 | 3,400 |
|
| <1 | <10 | 1,200 | 36 | 6,700 |
|
| <1 | <10 | 1,400 | 29 | 6,400 |
|
| <1 | <10 | <100 | 26 | <100 |
|
| 1 | 20 | <100 | 20 | <100 |
|
| 2 | 30 | 3,300 | (average) 35 | 17,000 |
All numbers are rounded.
*Age structure according to Table 4.
**Modeled using DisMod II.
YLD calculation includes a 3% discount rate and non-uniform age weights. The Standard West Level 26 life table was used according to the Global Burden of Disease Study [28, 29, 31, 33].
YLL: years of life lost due to premature mortality; YLD: years of life lost due to disability.
DALYs attributable to occupational mercury exposure from gold mining in Zimbabwe in 2004 by subgroup
| Age*(years) | Males | Females | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population** | DALYs | DALYs per 1,000 | Population** | DALYs | DALYs per 1,000 | Population** | DALYs | DALYs per 1,000 | |
|
| 1,540,000 | 1,200 | <1 | 1,529,000 | 500 | <1 | 3,069,000 | 1,700 | <1 |
|
| 1,042,000 | 28,900 | 28 | 1,038,000 | 3,400 | 3 | 2,080,000 | 32,300 | 16 |
|
| 1,533,000 | 38,200 | 25 | 1,552,000 | 6,700 | 4 | 3,085,000 | 44,900 | 15 |
|
| 871,000 | 10,100 | 12 | 870,000 | 6,400 | 7 | 1,741,000 | 16,500 | 9 |
|
| 293,000 | <100 | <1 | 353,000 | <100 | <1 | 646,000 | <100 | <1 |
|
| 788,000 | <100 | <1 | 1,083,000 | <100 | <1 | 1,870,000 | <100 | <1 |
|
| 6,067,000 | 78,400 | 13 | 6,425,000 | 17,000 | 3 | 12,492,000 | 95,400 | 8 |
All numbers are rounded.
The results of this analysis rest on the assumptions given in Table 2. Changing the assumptions will require changing the analysis.
*Age structure according to Table 4.
**Zimbabwe’s population in 2004; source: World population prospects by the United Nations [49].
DALYs: disability-adjusted life years.
Summary of the scope of the analysis: The most important limitations and research needs
| Scope of the analysis | Limitations | Research needs |
|---|---|---|
| Data from earlier research projects are used while no special data survey was done to achieve the research aim. | Conduct surveys to improve the data basis for DALY estimates. | |
| Use the advanced methods to determine DALYs. | ||
| Applying the methods of the GBD 2004 update because of the consistent reference year (2004) to enable comparisons while more advanced methods are available (GBD 2010 study [ | ||
| Conduct research to develop the DALY method (already started within the GBD 2010 study [ | ||
| Specific limitations of the summary measure DALY (e.g., ethical concerns about using disability weights) are included in the analysis. | ||
| Miners with acute, temporary or ending involvement in mining were not considered. | Conduct surveys to differentiate between subgroups of miners (duration of involvement, type of work, etc.) and to determine the burden of other exposed subgroups not or no longer actively involved in mining. | |
| No differentiation of burden between panners and smelter workers. | ||
| Other exposed subgroups (retired miners, residents at mining sites like the families of miners, etc.) were not considered. | ||
| Small sample size. | Conduct comprehensive surveys at several mining sites in Zimbabwe using samples of adequate size. | |
| The sample included data from two projects conducted during two different survey periods. | ||
| All the information came from just one mining site in Zimbabwe (Kadoma). | ||
| Contradictory information on number, age, and sex distribution of ASG miners in Zimbabwe. | Verify the estimates of the number, age, and sex distribution of ASG miners in Zimbabwe. | |
| No information about the burden in other years (e.g., the current burden) and other countries (e.g., Colombia). | ||
| Quantify DALYs from other years and mining sites for comparison. | ||
| No information about the burden when using mining methods and tools different from those in Kadoma. | ||
| Determine the health burden resulting from different mining methods and tools. | ||
| Specific limitations of the diagnostic tool are included in the analysis (e.g., no correcting factor for health effects unrelated to mercury; all items of the medical score sum are weighted equally). | Conduct research to develop an improved diagnostic tool. | |
| There is no established and internationally accepted diagnosis for chronic mercury intoxication. | ||
| Establish an internationally accepted algorithm diagnosis for chronic mercury intoxication. | ||
| There is no DW for chronic mercury intoxication; a provisional DW was used. | ||
| Derive a DW for chronic mercury intoxication. | ||
| Remission and mortality data are scarce. | ||
| Conduct cohort studies to verify the assumptions of no remission and no mortality. | ||
| It was necessary to model missing data. | Improve the data basis to allow analyses without modeled data. | |
| Specific limitations of DisMod II are included in the analysis. |
ASG: artisanal small-scale gold; ASGM: artisanal small-scale gold miners; DALYs: disability-adjusted life years; DisMod II: Disease Model, second version, a software tool developed by the World Health Organization; DW: Disability Weight; GBD: Global Burden of Disease and Injury.