Literature DB >> 21960027

Biological reference values for chemical compounds in the work area (BARs): an approach for evaluating biomonitoring data.

Thomas Göen1, Karl-Heinz Schaller, Hans Drexler.   

Abstract

Biological monitoring is a routine method that has been applied in occupational medical practice for many years. A requirement for its application is the availability of criteria suitable for evaluating biomonitoring data. Health-based threshold values are particularly useful as a criterion, yet only for substances for which effect thresholds can reliably be determined. For substances for which the concept of health-based threshold values is not applicable, the Working Group Setting of Threshold Limit Values in Biological Materials of the DFG Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area has recently established "Biologische Arbeitsstoff-Referenzwerte" (BARs, Biological Reference Values for Chemical Compounds in the Work Area) as an approach for evaluating biomonitoring data. The BAR represents the upper reference concentration of a biomarker in the general adult population without occupational exposure to the agent. It is derived from biomonitoring data of a sample of a defined population group. In general, a BAR corresponds to the 95th percentile of the sample distribution. Ideally, national environmental surveys including human biomonitoring results are used as basis for deriving BARs. The influence of age, sex, social status, residential area and life style factors on background exposure is considered in the evaluation of these values. Because tobacco smoking is the most frequent influencing factor, several BARs have been determined for non-smokers only. To date, BARs for 17 substances or substance groups are listed in the List of MAK and BAT Values 2011. BARs for another five substances have been discussed, but have not been established because of the insufficient scientific database. Establishing the BARs aims to facilitate the evaluation of human exposure to chemical compounds for which no health-based threshold values can be derived but an adequate assessment of exposure is required due to their toxicity. The application of BARs does not permit a toxicological evaluation, but does allow the occurrence and the extent of occupational exposure to hazardous substances to be proved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21960027     DOI: 10.1007/s00420-011-0699-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 0340-0131            Impact factor:   3.015


  23 in total

1.  Biomonitoring action levels in Finland.

Authors:  M Kiilunen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  An analysis of criteria for biological limit values developed in Germany and in the United States.

Authors:  M S Morgan; K H Schaller
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Sub-working group "air analysis" of the Senate Commission on the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG).

Authors:  Majlinda R Lahaniatis; Rudolf H Schwabe; Wolfgang H Riepe; Dietmar Breuer; Heidrun J Greim; Antonius Kettrup; Harun A Parlar; Thomas H Brock
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 4.  Biological monitoring and Biological Limit Values (BLV): the strategy of the European Union.

Authors:  Hermann M Bolt; Ricarda Thier
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 4.372

Review 5.  Strategy of biological monitoring and setting of biological threshold limits (BAT values) in Germany.

Authors:  G Lehnert; K H Schaller
Journal:  Isr J Med Sci       Date:  1995-09

6.  The Environmental Specimen Bank for Human Tissues as part of the German Environmental Specimen Bank.

Authors:  Gerhard A Wiesmüller; Rolf Eckard; Lorenz Dobler; Andreas Günsel; Marek Oganowski; Christa Schröter-Kermani; Christoph Schlüter; Andreas Gies; Fritz H Kemper
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 5.840

7.  Kashin-Beck osteoarthropathy in rural Tibet in relation to selenium and iodine status.

Authors:  R Moreno-Reyes; C Suetens; F Mathieu; F Begaux; D Zhu; M T Rivera; M Boelaert; J Nève; N Perlmutter; J Vanderpas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Association between serum selenium and the risk of cancer.

Authors:  J T Salonen; G Alfthan; J K Huttunen; P Puska
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  German Environmental Survey 1998 (GerES III): environmental pollutants in blood of the German population.

Authors:  Kerstin Becker; Susanne Kaus; Christian Krause; Peter Lepom; Christine Schulz; Margarete Seiwert; Bernd Seifert
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.840

10.  Twenty years of the German Environmental Survey (GerES): human biomonitoring--temporal and spatial (West Germany/East Germany) differences in population exposure.

Authors:  C Schulz; A Conrad; K Becker; M Kolossa-Gehring; M Seiwert; B Seifert
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 5.840

View more
  4 in total

1.  Concept for the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Substances in Population-Based Human Biomonitoring.

Authors:  Klaus-Michael Wollin; Petra Apel; Yvonni Chovolou; Ulrike Pabel; Thomas Schettgen; Marike Kolossa-Gehring; Claudia Röhl; On Behalf Of The Human Biomonitoring Commission Of The German Environment Agency
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 2.  Biomonitoring as an Underused Exposure Assessment Tool in Occupational Safety and Health Context-Challenges and Way Forward.

Authors:  Susana Viegas; Maryam Zare Jeddi; Nancy B Hopf; Jos Bessems; Nicole Palmen; Karen S Galea; Kate Jones; Peter Kujath; Radu-Corneliu Duca; Hans Verhagen; Tiina Santonen; Robert Pasanen-Kase
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Nickel contamination after minimally-invasive repair of pectus excavatum persists after bar removal.

Authors:  Caroline Fortmann; Thomas Goeen; Norman Zinne; Soeren Wiesner; Benno M Ure; Claus Petersen; Joachim F Kuebler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Trace metal release after minimally-invasive repair of pectus excavatum.

Authors:  Caroline Fortmann; Thomas Göen; Marcus Krüger; Benno M Ure; Claus Petersen; Joachim F Kübler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.