Literature DB >> 10491773

An analysis of criteria for biological limit values developed in Germany and in the United States.

M S Morgan1, K H Schaller.   

Abstract

The biological tolerance values established by the German Research Foundation and the biological exposure indices developed by the American Conference of Governmental Hygienists represent two extensive lists of occupational exposure guidelines for use in biological monitoring. Although there is substantial agreement between the two organizations on most points, there are several important differences in the approaches taken in setting of the guideline values. Analysis of these distinctions serves to focus attention on the current issues impeding international agreement over occupational exposure guidelines. Among these issues are (1) the specification of the biological monitoring guidelines as ceiling or average values; (2) whether carcinogenic substances should be treated differently from agents with other toxic outcomes; (3) the method of accounting for variability among individual workers; and (4) the extent to which these guidelines should be extended to include genetic markers, indicators of susceptibility, or indicators of early biological response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10491773     DOI: 10.1007/s004200050362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 0340-0131            Impact factor:   3.015


  4 in total

1.  Biological reference values for chemical compounds in the work area (BARs): an approach for evaluating biomonitoring data.

Authors:  Thomas Göen; Karl-Heinz Schaller; Hans Drexler
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Investigating the immunologic effects of CoCr nanoparticles.

Authors:  Bamikole Ogunwale; Andreas Schmidt-Ott; R M Dominic Meek; James M Brewer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Biological tolerance values: change in a paradigm concept from assessment of a single value to use of an average.

Authors:  Hans Drexler; Thomas Göen; Karl Heinz Schaller
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Metal ion levels and functional results after either resurfacing hip arthroplasty or conventional metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  José M H Smolders; Annemiek Hol; Willard J Rijnberg; Job L C van Susante
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.717

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.