Literature DB >> 18556921

Studying visual search using systems factorial methodology with target-distractor similarity as the factor.

Mario Fifić1, James T Townsend, Ami Eidels.   

Abstract

Systems factorial technology (SFT) is a theory-driven set of methodologies oriented toward identification of basic mechanisms, such as parallel versus serial processing, of perception and cognition. Studies employing SFT in visual search with small display sizes have repeatedly shown decisive evidence for parallel processing. The first strong evidence for serial processing was recently found in short-term memory search, using target-distractor (T-D) similarity as a key experimental variable (Townsend & Fifić, 2004). One of the major goals of the present study was to employ T-D similarity in visual search to learn whether this mode of manipulating processing speed would affect the parallel versus serial issue in that domain. The result was a surprising and regular departure from ordinary parallel or serial processing. The most plausible account at present relies on the notion of positively interacting parallel channels.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18556921      PMCID: PMC2630500          DOI: 10.3758/pp.70.4.583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  31 in total

1.  The psychophysics of visual search.

Authors:  J Palmer; P Verghese; M Pavel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The temporal dynamics of visual search: evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches.

Authors:  B McElree; M Carrasco
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Spontaneous allocation of visual attention: dominant role of uniqueness.

Authors:  H Pashler; C R Harris
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

4.  Truth and consequences of ordinal differences in statistical distributions: toward a theory of hierarchical inference.

Authors:  J T Townsend
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Termination of a visual search with large display size effects.

Authors:  Denis Cousineau; Richard M Shiffrin
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2004

6.  On the costs and benefits of faces and words: process characteristics of feature search in highly meaningful stimuli.

Authors:  Michael J Wenger; James T Townsend
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  An interactive race model of divided attention.

Authors:  J T Mordkoff; S Yantis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Eye movements during parallel-serial visual search.

Authors:  G J Zelinsky; D L Sheinberg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Varieties of perceptual independence.

Authors:  F G Ashby; J T Townsend
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Divided attention: evidence for coactivation with redundant signals.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  6 in total

1.  Response-time tests of logical-rule models of categorization.

Authors:  Daniel R Little; Robert M Nosofsky; Stephen E Denton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Perceptual learning produces perceptual objects.

Authors:  Michael J Wenger; Stephanie E Rhoten
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Information-processing alternatives to holistic perception: identifying the mechanisms of secondary-level holism within a categorization paradigm.

Authors:  Mario Fifić; James T Townsend
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Double jeopardy in inferring cognitive processes.

Authors:  Mario Fific
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-21

5.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and workload capacity.

Authors:  Ju-Chi Yu; Ting-Yun Chang; Cheng-Ta Yang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-12-18

6.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) facilitates overall visual search response times but does not interact with visual search task factors.

Authors:  Kyongje Sung; Barry Gordon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.