Literature DB >> 1830090

An interactive race model of divided attention.

J T Mordkoff1, S Yantis.   

Abstract

Two classes of models have been proposed to explain how redundant information extracted from separate sources comes to activate a single response. Each provides a fundamentally different account of why responses to redundant signals are typically faster than those to either signal alone (the redundant-signals effect). Independent race models assume that a race occurs between perceptual codes on independent channels and that only the winner activates the response. Coactivation models assume that there is some form of energy or activation-strength summation, with information being pooled across channels prior to decision. An intermediate class of models is introduced and a specific exemplar, the interactive race model, is tested in a series of redundant-target detection experiments. In particular, we examine the effects on performance of two types of contingency that have previously been overlooked as sources of task-relevant information. The results reveal that response times are significantly influenced by both interstimulus and stimulus-response contingencies. The interactive race model provides a natural account of these findings as well as several otherwise puzzling results in the divided-attention literature.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1830090     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.17.2.520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  66 in total

1.  A comparison of two response time models applied to perceptual matching.

Authors:  T Van Zandt; H Colonius; R W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-06

2.  A unique role of endogenous visual-spatial attention in rapid processing of multiple targets.

Authors:  Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez; Marcia Grabowecky; German Palafox; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Testing models of the redundant-signals effect: a warning concerning the combination-rule regression analysis.

Authors:  J T Mordkoff
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-11

4.  The serial-parallel dilemma: a case study in a linkage of theory and method.

Authors:  James T Townsend; Michael J Wenger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

5.  Variations on variability: effects of display composition on same-different discrimination in pigeons.

Authors:  Leyre Castro; Edward A Wasserman; Michael E Young
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Observation: Three reasons to avoid having half of the trials be congruent in a four-alternative forced-choice experiment on sequential modulation.

Authors:  J Toby Mordkoff
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

7.  The spotlight of attention illuminates failed feature-based expectancies.

Authors:  Jesse J Bengson; Javier Lopez-Calderon; George R Mangun
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Cross-modal perceptual load: the impact of modality and individual differences.

Authors:  Rajwant Sandhu; Benjamin James Dyson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Age-related differences in the processing of redundant visual dimensions.

Authors:  Barbara Bucur; David J Madden; Philip A Allen
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2005-09

10.  Assessing the effect of visual and tactile distractors on the perception of auditory apparent motion.

Authors:  Daniel Sanabria; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.