B E Weber1, B M Reilly. 1. University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, St Mary's Hospital, Rochester, NY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Breast cancer screening with mammography is an effective intervention for women aged 50 to 75 years but it is underused, especially by the urban poor. OBJECTIVE: To improve mammography completion rates for urban women aged 52 to 77 years who had not had a mammogram in at least 2 years. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial of a case management intervention by culturally sensitive community health educators vs usual care in 6 primary care practices supported by a computerized clinical information system. RESULTS: Women in the intervention group were nearly 3 times as likely to receive a mammogram (relative risk, 2.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.75-4.73). The benefit persisted when analyzed by age; race, and prior screening behavior. This intervention was practice based, not dependent on visits, and enhanced the efficacy of an already successful computerized preventive care information system. CONCLUSIONS: Personalized education and case management are successful in enhancing compliance with breast cancer screening among historically noncompliant vulnerable urban women. This intervention, when combined with a preventive care information system, has the potential to achieve Healthy People 2000 objectives for breast cancer screening.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Breast cancer screening with mammography is an effective intervention for women aged 50 to 75 years but it is underused, especially by the urban poor. OBJECTIVE: To improve mammography completion rates for urban women aged 52 to 77 years who had not had a mammogram in at least 2 years. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial of a case management intervention by culturally sensitive community health educators vs usual care in 6 primary care practices supported by a computerized clinical information system. RESULTS:Women in the intervention group were nearly 3 times as likely to receive a mammogram (relative risk, 2.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.75-4.73). The benefit persisted when analyzed by age; race, and prior screening behavior. This intervention was practice based, not dependent on visits, and enhanced the efficacy of an already successful computerized preventive care information system. CONCLUSIONS: Personalized education and case management are successful in enhancing compliance with breast cancer screening among historically noncompliant vulnerable urban women. This intervention, when combined with a preventive care information system, has the potential to achieve Healthy People 2000 objectives for breast cancer screening.
Authors: Jacqueline Martinez; Marguerite Ro; Normandy William Villa; Wayne Powell; James R Knickman Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-10-20 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Kathleen Ell; Betsy Vourlekis; Jan Nissly; Deborah Padgett; Diana Pineda; Olga Sarabia; Virginia Walther; Susan Blumenfield; Pey-jiuan Lee Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2002-08
Authors: Richard G Roetzheim; Lisa K Christman; Paul B Jacobsen; Alan B Cantor; Jennifer Schroeder; Rania Abdulla; Seft Hunter; Thomas N Chirikos; Jeffrey P Krischer Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2004 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.166