Literature DB >> 9628711

Influence of socioeconomic and cultural factors on racial differences in late-stage presentation of breast cancer.

D R Lannin1, H F Mathews, J Mitchell, M S Swanson, F H Swanson, M S Edwards.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Breast cancer mortality is higher among African American women than among white women in the United States, but the reasons for the racial difference are not known.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of socioeconomic and cultural factors on the racial difference in breast cancer stage at diagnosis.
DESIGN: Case-control study of patients diagnosed as having breast cancer at the University Medical Center of Eastern Carolina from 1985 through 1992.
SETTING: The major health care facility for 2 rural counties in eastern North Carolina.
SUBJECTS: Five hundred forty of 743 patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer and 414 control women from the community matched by age, race, and area of residence. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Breast cancer stage at diagnosis.
RESULTS: Of the 540 patients, 94 (17.4%) presented with TNM stage III or IV disease. The following demographic and socioeconomic factors were significant predictors of advanced stage: being African American (odds ratio [OR], 3.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-4.7); having low income (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 2.1-6.5); never having been married (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.4-5.9); having no private health insurance (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.6-4.0); delaying seeing a physician because of money (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.5); or lacking transportation (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-3.6). Univariate analysis also revealed a large number of cultural beliefs to be significant predictors. Examples include the following beliefs: air causes a cancer to spread (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.8-4.3); the devil can cause a person to get cancer (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.2-3.5); women who have breast surgery are no longer attractive to men (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.5); and chiropractic is an effective treatment for breast cancer (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.4-4.4). When the demographic and socioeconomic variables were included in a multivariate logistic regression model, the OR for late stage among African Americans decreased to 1.8 (95% CI, 1.1 -3.2) compared with 3.0 (95% CI, 1.9-4.7) for race alone. However, when the belief measures were included with the demographic and socioeconomic variables, the OR for late stage among African Americans decreased further to 1.2 (95% CI, 0.6-2.5).
CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic factors alone were not sufficient to explain the dramatic effect of race on breast cancer stage; however, socioeconomic variables in conjunction with cultural beliefs and attitudes could largely account for the observed effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9628711     DOI: 10.1001/jama.279.22.1801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  172 in total

Review 1.  Can cultural competency reduce racial and ethnic health disparities? A review and conceptual model.

Authors:  C Brach; I Fraser
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.929

2.  Geographic socioeconomic status, race, and advanced-stage breast cancer in New York City.

Authors:  Sharon Stein Merkin; Lori Stevenson; Neil Powe
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Does social selection explain the association between state-level racial animus and racial disparities in self-rated health in the United States?

Authors:  Sarah McKetta; Mark L Hatzenbuehler; Charissa Pratt; Lisa Bates; Bruce G Link; Katherine M Keyes
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  Cancer-related health disparities in women.

Authors:  Karen Glanz; Robert T Croyle; Veronica Y Chollette; Vivian W Pinn
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Teaching physicians-in-training to address racial disparities in health: a hospital-community partnership.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Jacobs; Claire Kohrman; Maurice Lemon; Dennis L Vickers
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Black and white patients fare equally well when treated with postlumpectomy radiotherapy.

Authors:  Stuart H Burri; Jerome C Landry; H James Norton; Lawrence W Davis
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 7.  Depression as a risk factor for underuse of mammography.

Authors:  Hillary R Bogner; Marsha N Wittink
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 8.  Disparities in screening mammography. Current status, interventions and implications.

Authors:  Monica E Peek; Jini H Han
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Cultural views, language ability, and mammography use in Chinese American women.

Authors:  Wenchi Liang; Judy Wang; Mei-Yuh Chen; Shibao Feng; Bin Yi; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2009-02-20

10.  Complementary and alternative medicine modality use and beliefs among African American prostate cancer survivors.

Authors:  Randy A Jones; Ann Gill Taylor; Cheryl Bourguignon; Richard Steeves; Gertrude Fraser; Marguerite Lippert; Dan Theodorescu; Holly Mathews; Kerry Laing Kilbridge
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.