UNLABELLED: Detectors with depth-encoding allow a PET scanner to simultaneously achieve high sensitivity and high spatial resolution. METHODS: A prototype PET scanner, consisting of depth-encoding detectors constructed by dual-ended readout of lutetium oxyorthosilicate (LSO) arrays with 2 position-sensitive avalanche photodiodes (PSAPDs), was developed. The scanner comprised 2 detector plates, each with 4 detector modules, and the LSO arrays consisted of 7 x 7 elements, with a crystal size of 0.9225 x 0.9225 x 20 mm and a pitch of 1.0 mm. The active area of the PSAPDs was 8 x 8 mm. The performance of individual detector modules was characterized. A line-source phantom and a hot-rod phantom were imaged on the prototype scanner in 2 different scanner configurations. The images were reconstructed using 20, 10, 5, 2, and 1 depth-of-interaction (DOI) bins to demonstrate the effects of DOI resolution on reconstructed image resolution and visual image quality. RESULTS: The flood histograms measured from the sum of both PSAPD signals were only weakly depth-dependent, and excellent crystal identification was obtained at all depths. The flood histograms improved as the detector temperature decreased. DOI resolution and energy resolution improved significantly as the temperature decreased from 20 degrees C to 10 degrees C but improved only slightly with a subsequent temperature decrease to 0 degrees C. A full width at half maximum (FWHM) DOI resolution of 2 mm and an FWHM energy resolution of 15% were obtained at a temperature of 10 degrees C. Phantom studies showed that DOI measurements significantly improved the reconstructed image resolution. In the first scanner configuration (parallel detector planes), the image resolution at the center of the field of view was 0.9-mm FWHM with 20 DOI bins and 1.6-mm FWHM with 1 DOI bin. In the second scanner configuration (detector planes at a 40 degrees angle), the image resolution at the center of the field of view was 1.0-mm FWHM with 20 DOI bins and was not measurable when using only 1 bin. CONCLUSION: PET scanners based on this detector design offer the prospect of high and uniform spatial resolution (crystal size, approximately 1 mm; DOI resolution, approximately 2 mm), high sensitivity (20-mm-thick detectors), and compact size (DOI encoding permits detectors to be tightly packed around the subject and minimizes number of detectors needed).
UNLABELLED: Detectors with depth-encoding allow a PET scanner to simultaneously achieve high sensitivity and high spatial resolution. METHODS: A prototype PET scanner, consisting of depth-encoding detectors constructed by dual-ended readout of lutetium oxyorthosilicate (LSO) arrays with 2 position-sensitive avalanche photodiodes (PSAPDs), was developed. The scanner comprised 2 detector plates, each with 4 detector modules, and the LSO arrays consisted of 7 x 7 elements, with a crystal size of 0.9225 x 0.9225 x 20 mm and a pitch of 1.0 mm. The active area of the PSAPDs was 8 x 8 mm. The performance of individual detector modules was characterized. A line-source phantom and a hot-rod phantom were imaged on the prototype scanner in 2 different scanner configurations. The images were reconstructed using 20, 10, 5, 2, and 1 depth-of-interaction (DOI) bins to demonstrate the effects of DOI resolution on reconstructed image resolution and visual image quality. RESULTS: The flood histograms measured from the sum of both PSAPD signals were only weakly depth-dependent, and excellent crystal identification was obtained at all depths. The flood histograms improved as the detector temperature decreased. DOI resolution and energy resolution improved significantly as the temperature decreased from 20 degrees C to 10 degrees C but improved only slightly with a subsequent temperature decrease to 0 degrees C. A full width at half maximum (FWHM) DOI resolution of 2 mm and an FWHM energy resolution of 15% were obtained at a temperature of 10 degrees C. Phantom studies showed that DOI measurements significantly improved the reconstructed image resolution. In the first scanner configuration (parallel detector planes), the image resolution at the center of the field of view was 0.9-mm FWHM with 20 DOI bins and 1.6-mm FWHM with 1 DOI bin. In the second scanner configuration (detector planes at a 40 degrees angle), the image resolution at the center of the field of view was 1.0-mm FWHM with 20 DOI bins and was not measurable when using only 1 bin. CONCLUSION: PET scanners based on this detector design offer the prospect of high and uniform spatial resolution (crystal size, approximately 1 mm; DOI resolution, approximately 2 mm), high sensitivity (20-mm-thick detectors), and compact size (DOI encoding permits detectors to be tightly packed around the subject and minimizes number of detectors needed).
Authors: A F Chatziioannou; S R Cherry; Y Shao; R W Silverman; K Meadors; T H Farquhar; M Pedarsani; M E Phelps Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: C Tai; A Chatziioannou; S Siegel; J Young; D Newport; R N Goble; R E Nutt; S R Cherry Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Yuan-Chuan Tai; Arion F Chatziioannou; Yongfeng Yang; Robert W Silverman; Ken Meadors; Stefan Siegel; Danny F Newport; Jennifer R Stickel; Simon R Cherry Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2003-06-07 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: P A Dokhale; R W Silverman; K S Shah; R Grazioso; R Farrell; J Glodo; M A McClish; G Entine; V H Tran; S R Cherry Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2004-09-21 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Ciprian Catana; Yibao Wu; Martin S Judenhofer; Jinyi Qi; Bernd J Pichler; Simon R Cherry Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Hugo W A M de Jong; Floris H P van Velden; Reina W Kloet; Fred L Buijs; Ronald Boellaard; Adriaan A Lammertsma Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2007-02-14 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Yongfeng Yang; Yuan-Chuan Tai; Stefan Siegel; Danny F Newport; Bing Bai; Quanzheng Li; Richard M Leahy; Simon R Cherry Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2004-06-21 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Paul D Reynolds; Peter D Olcott; Guillem Pratx; Frances W Y Lau; Craig S Levin Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2010-09-27 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Yongfeng Yang; Jinyi Qi; Yibao Wu; Sara St James; Richard Farrell; Purushottam A Dokhale; Kanai S Shah; Simon R Cherry Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2008-12-19 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Sara St James; Yongfeng Yang; Yibao Wu; Richard Farrell; Purushottam Dokhale; Kanai S Shah; Simon R Cherry Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2009-06-30 Impact factor: 3.609