Literature DB >> 18550813

Protein model refinement using an optimized physics-based all-atom force field.

Anna Jagielska1, Liliana Wroblewska, Jeffrey Skolnick.   

Abstract

One of the greatest challenges in protein structure prediction is the refinement of low-resolution predicted models to high-resolution structures that are close to the native state. Although contemporary structure prediction methods can assemble the correct topology for a large fraction of protein domains, such approximate models are often not of the resolution required for many important applications, including studies of reaction mechanisms and virtual ligand screening. Thus, the development of a method that could bring those structures closer to the native state is of great importance. We recently optimized the relative weights of the components of the Amber ff03 potential on a large set of decoy structures to create a funnel-shaped energy landscape with the native structure at the global minimum. Such an energy function might be able to drive proteins toward their native structure. In this work, for a test set of 47 proteins, with 100 decoy structures per protein that have a range of structural similarities to the native state, we demonstrate that our optimized potential can drive protein models closer to their native structure. Comparing the lowest-energy structure from each trajectory with the starting decoy, structural improvement is seen for 70% of the models on average. The ability to do such systematic structural refinements by using a physics-based all-atom potential represents a promising approach to high-resolution structure prediction.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18550813      PMCID: PMC2448826          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0800054105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  30 in total

1.  Ab initio protein structure prediction of CASP III targets using ROSETTA.

Authors:  K T Simons; R Bonneau; I Ruczinski; D Baker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999

2.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Protein structure prediction and structural genomics.

Authors:  D Baker; A Sali
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  TOUCHSTONE II: a new approach to ab initio protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Andrzej Kolinski; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Yong Duan; Chun Wu; Shibasish Chowdhury; Mathew C Lee; Guoming Xiong; Wei Zhang; Rong Yang; Piotr Cieplak; Ray Luo; Taisung Lee; James Caldwell; Junmei Wang; Peter Kollman
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  Automated structure prediction of weakly homologous proteins on a genomic scale.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-12-01

8.  TASSER: an automated method for the prediction of protein tertiary structures in CASP6.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Adrian K Arakaki; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005

9.  Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins.

Authors:  Philip Bradley; Kira M S Misura; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins.

Authors:  K W Plaxco; K T Simons; D Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1998-04-10       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  24 in total

1.  GOAP: a generalized orientation-dependent, all-atom statistical potential for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Assessment of protein structure refinement in CASP9.

Authors:  Justin L MacCallum; Alberto Pérez; Michael J Schnieders; Lan Hua; Matthew P Jacobson; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-08-30

3.  Force field bias in protein folding simulations.

Authors:  Peter L Freddolino; Sanghyun Park; Benoît Roux; Klaus Schulten
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Generalized ensemble methods for de novo structure prediction.

Authors:  Alena Shmygelska; Michael Levitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Ligand-Binding-Site Structure Refinement Using Molecular Dynamics with Restraints Derived from Predicted Binding Site Templates.

Authors:  Hugo Guterres; Hui Sun Lee; Wonpil Im
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  A coarse-grained potential for fold recognition and molecular dynamics simulations of proteins.

Authors:  Peter Májek; Ron Elber
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-09

7.  Symmetry-restrained molecular dynamics simulations improve homology models of potassium channels.

Authors:  Andriy Anishkin; Adina L Milac; H Robert Guy
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-03

8.  Protein Structure Refinement through Structure Selection and Averaging from Molecular Dynamics Ensembles.

Authors:  Vahid Mirjalili; Michael Feig
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Splitting statistical potentials into meaningful scoring functions: testing the prediction of near-native structures from decoy conformations.

Authors:  Patrick Aloy; Baldo Oliva
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2009-11-16

10.  Discriminating the native structure from decoys using scoring functions based on the residue packing in globular proteins.

Authors:  Ranjit Prasad Bahadur; Pinak Chakrabarti
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2009-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.